Email List

To join our e-mail list, please enter your e-mail address. You can unsubscribe at any time.






A rendering of LTD / Worthe’s proposal for Bergamot Station Arts Center at 2525 Michigan Avenue. It is one of three development teams vying for the rights to the development site.
Courtesy Of The City Of Santa Monica
A rendering of LTD / Worthe’s proposal for Bergamot Station Arts Center at 2525 Michigan Avenue. It is one of three development teams vying for the rights to the development site.

News, Development, Santa Monica

Bergamot Station Arts Center Development Vote Delayed

Posted Feb. 28, 2014, 8:50 am

Parimal M. Rohit / Staff Writer

The beginning of February witnessed the Santa Monica City Council approving a large multi-use development to be built in the Bergamot Station area. As February comes to a close three weeks later, council members put off making a decision on moving forward with a development team to develop an arts-themed project in the same part of town.

At Tuesday’s council meeting, the City’s elected panel unanimously voted to delay selecting from one of three development teams to enter into exclusive negotiations to develop the Bergamot Station Arts Center until more information could be made available to them from City staff.

Yet, those three teams will have to wait a little bit longer to find out whom the council will select to enter into an exclusive negotiation agreement, as City staff will return to the council with updated information in 30 to 60 days.

The project proposed bringing a hotel, restaurant, open space, and creative office space to complement art galleries, non-profit cultural organizations, and the Santa Monica Museum of Art.

Council member Kevin McKeown acknowledged a lot more could happen once negotiations with the development team take place, but he was uncomfortable selecting any of the three finalists based upon the information currently available to the council.

“I thought tonight was going to be about art,” McKeown said. “Right now, I feel as if I have been served with undercooked eggs. I don’t feel the council has all the information we need.”

With the delayed vote, McKeown hoped City staff would engage in more conversation with the current art galleries at Bergamot Station, incorporate the Arts Commission into the process, and include any other parties who want to have a conversation with City staff or the developers.

Council member Gleam Davis warned against the proposed project becoming too “cool” for its own good, hence having an extra month or two to vet the three development team finalists would help make for a better project.

“We don’t want to turn it into The Grove dressed up in art,” Davis said. “I really want to hear from the people who are at Bergamot now. There seems to be overwhelming support for the idea of, ‘if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.’ My concern is we’re trying to fix it up a little too much here.”

Council member Bob Holbrook echoed the sentiment shared by his colleagues that preservation was a vital issue and more time was need to ensure such preservation.

“We need a little more time to look through this thoroughly,” Holbrook said. “It’s really important we get this right.”

The proposed Bergamot Station Arts Center would be located at 2525 Michigan Avenue and within walking distance of the recently approved Hines project at the old Papermate building near Olympic Boulevard and 26th Street.

Santa Monica used transit funds to purchase the 5.6-acre lot, which currently consists of five buildings, in 1989 with the intent, according to City staff, “of serving future transit needs in Santa Monica and providing a source of revenue for the Big Blue Bus.”

There are currently 30 creative small businesses operating at Bergamot Station Arts Center including art galleries, product designers, a café, and a non-profit theatre company. Collectively, the tenant subleases bring in $528,000 annually to the City.

The current lease expires Dec. 31, 2017, according to City staff.

According to the City staff report, Santa Monica’s goals for the site include supporting the arts, delivering a transit-oriented development, and maximizing revenue for BBB operations.

City staff had recommended to council members prior to the Feb. 25 meeting to consider a proposal by 26Street TOD Partners LLC, who proposed a development 221,264 square feet in size, with 75,000 square feet to be dedicated to subsidized arts space, 68,777 square feet for a hotel, 40,000 square feet in creative office space, 20,000 square feet allocated to art-related retail space, and 17,877 square feet set aside for restaurant.

Also proposed was 64,900 square feet of open space, 442 at-grade and subterranean parking spaces, a six-story hotel with 93 rooms, preservation of at least 54 percent of existing buildings, night and weekend site-activations uses, bike facilities, and subsidized spaces for non-profit arts organizations and for-profit galleries.

Other proposed community benefits included LEED gold-level certification, rooftop solar units, a rainwater collection and irrigation system, natural lighting and ventilation for tenant spaces, and an estimated $150,00 annual contribution to arts programming re-directed from parking revenues.

Two other groups submitted proposals: Bergamot Station LTD/Worthe Real Estate Group, and REthink Development/Kor Group. However, City staff balked at both proposals, suggesting the 26Street TOD Partners bid instead.

The 26Street TOD Partners proposal carried the highest price tag at a little more than $92 million. REthink Development/Kor Group’s proposal was priced in at about $81.7 million, while Bergamot Station LTD/Worthe Real Estate Group estimated its project would cost about $80.4 million.

Post a comment


Mar. 5, 2014, 5:03:32 pm

Marilyn Judson said...

As a Santa Monica resident since 1976, I have watched City Hall approve numerous large developments over the past two decades with minimal regard for their cumulative impact on a limited infrastructure. I have watched our seaside city becomes a “Mini-Manhattan,” with a dismaying erosion of the lifestyle that brought my husband and I here shortly after college. Two recent examples of this disregard are the traffic impacts expected from the two proposed Bergamot projects. The EIR for the Hines’ Transit Village states that its ~400,000 square footage will generate 7000 new daily vehicle trips (Kevin McKeown, SM Daily Press, 3/3/14). Presumably, the nearby Bergamot Arts Center will significantly add to that load with its size of ~200,000 square feet. The scale and density of both developments is at odds with the livable city vision and spirit of the 2010 “Land Use and Circulation Element” (LUCE) of the City’s General Plan. The LUCE describes a people-friendly cityscape with lots of green space, a buffer between new commercial and existing residential areas, and “no net new PM trips” (McKeown). It is the result of a 6-year process that included residents' input on the shape and character of limited growth over the next 20 years. I was part of that process. Now I wonder if the Council is taking it seriously. In Santa Monica we have only so much street space for cars, buses and bicycles (I ride my bicycle 2-3 times weekly to do errands). We have only so much water, parking and other resources for the tenants of new developments with tightly packed offices and lofts. Finally, homes adjacent to large new commercial buildings have only so much ability to absorb the increased traffic, noise, fumes, and safety issues that usually result. Please, City Council, follow both the spirit and letter of the City Plan’s LUCE. If you do that, in 20 years’ time we will all still enjoy living here in lovely Santa Monica, and you will have helped to make that happen!

SM Mirror TV