Email List

To join our e-mail list, please enter your e-mail address. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Shows

Sections

Classifieds

Directories

Contact

A rendering of Metropolitan Pacific Capital’s proposed mixed-use development for the southeast corner of 4th and Arizona.
Courtesy Of The City Of Santa Monica
A rendering of Metropolitan Pacific Capital’s proposed mixed-use development for the southeast corner of 4th and Arizona.

News, City Council, Development, Santa Monica

The Plaza At Santa Monica On Hold At 4th/Arizona

A rendering of Related California's proposed project for the 4th/Arizona site. While Related was not selected to enter into exclusive negotiations with the City, it may still be in with a chance if MPC's project does not get approval from council members.
Courtesy Of The City Of Santa Monica
A rendering of Related California's proposed project for the 4th/Arizona site. While Related was not selected to enter into exclusive negotiations with the City, it may still be in with a chance if MPC's project does not get approval from council members.

Posted Sep. 6, 2013, 8:57 am

Parimal M. Rohit / Staff Writer

A project proposing to build almost 500,000 square feet of hotel, office, retail, and residential space in the heart of Santa Monica’s urban core at 4th and Arizona will have to wait a little while longer before seeing the light of day.

Council members last week voted down a proposal by Metropolitan Pacific Capital (MPC), believing the project as currently designed still had some lingering issues that needed to be addressed.

MPC pitched a 12-story development – labeled as “The Plaza at Santa Monica” – on a 2.5-acre lot owned by City Hall.

Rem Koolhaas is the lead architect for the design of this public/private project.

About 300,000 square feet of building would be dedicated to hotel and office space, according to plans. Another 85,000-plus square feet were set aside for flexible office or residential use. Retail space would take up another 40,000-plus square feet. More than 22,000 square feet were to be allocated to cultural use (12,000-plus square feet) and service (10,000-plus square feet).

The project proposal also included more than 56,000 square feet of public open space, including a ground level plaza, paseo and bike lane, and a second floor terrace.

A “special purpose entity” would be designated to manage the open space, according to City staff. The entity, City staff stated, would “ensure active year-round programming, including a seasonal ice skating rink.”

In terms of parking, 1,220 spaces (580 of them public) were proposed.

“As proposed, the project would provide several public gathering spaces, pedestrian passages through the site, neighborhood serving retail, cultural facilities, a bicycle station and related facilities, public parking, iconic architecture, and possibly affordable housing or a financial contribution,” City staff stated.

According to City staff, MPC’s proposal carried a price tag of $331.3 million with annual ground lease payments of $1.3 million. The estimated budget for open space management would reach $860,000 annually within four years of the project’s opening, City staff estimated.

In a 5 to 1 vote last week, council members decided to postpone a final decision on the proposed project, giving MPC and its partners a chance to address a handful of concerns raised during the Aug. 27 meeting.

Also given a chance to rehash its proposal was Related California, another developer who submitted a bid but was not selected by City staff to enter into exclusive negotiations.

Forest City Development was the third company in the running, however they no longer appear to be included in the running.

All three developers – Forest City Development, MPC, and Related California – submitted proposals earlier this year to build on the City-owned property at Fourth and Arizona. City staff proposed to council members that they should enter into exclusive negotiations with MPC.

The lack of housing in MPC’s proposal was a primary concern for council members, as, under the plans presented Aug. 27, the developer had no more than an option to develop 85,511 square feet – less than 20 percent of the 448,182 square feet of proposed building space – for residential purposes. That same space could also be built as office space at the developer’s discretion.

Beyond the yearning for more housing, council members also pondered how the public would access the proposed open space.

Also up for discussion was the level of control City Hall would have in selecting the retailers who would fill in the estimated 40,000 square feet of retail space.

Council member Bob Holbrook cast the sole nay vote. Similar to his position in the Village Trailer Park vote, Holbrook stated he felt MPC had already gone through an arduous and competitive process to get to this point and therefore should be allowed to move forward.

Other council members – specifically Mayor Pro Tem Terry O’Day and council member Gleam Davis – said allowing MPC and Related California to continue competing for a little while longer could yield a better proposal.

MPC’s team included Clarett West Development and DLJ Real Estate Capital Partners.

According to information made available on the City’s website, Related California proposed 846 public parking spaces, 20 percent of residential units available for very low income households, “iconic architecture,” a public gallery space and a rooftop bar, and a financial benefit of $102.3 million for City Hall. The total proposed project size was 484,039 square feet in building space and 39,735 square feet for public open space.

Council member Tony Vazquez was not present at last week’s meeting.

Post a comment

Comments

Sep. 6, 2013, 1:03:48 pm

D'Lynn Waldron said...

That land is NOT owned by "City Hall"; the Council majority just acts as if it is. That land is owned by the citizens of Santa Monica and OUR majority does not want any more of this over-development that is destroying Santa Monica.

Sep. 7, 2013, 2:15:48 pm

R Templeton said...

Cut it down to 4 storeys with an ice rink, and 1,200 parking spaces and you've got a deal. (Our Council seems hell-bent on turning Santa Monica into Universal CityWalk with a Century City overlay.)

Sep. 9, 2013, 3:33:17 pm

Peter Altschuler said...

Developers' promises of financial advantages always overlook one crucial aspect -- the added cost of city services required, year over year, to accommodate each new project. Trash collection, police and fire expenses, roadway maintenance, traffic management, pedestrian congestion, and the increasing inability among Santa Monica's actual residents to access the stores, restaurants, movie theaters, and other services in the downtown district. We're not in danger of becoming Universal CityWalk; we're devolving into Manhattan-by-the-Sea.

SM Mirror TV