|
[side_bar.asp]
|
It’s A Small WorldThe Greens:
In Santa Monica and Freiburg, Germany
Naomi Kresge
Special to the Mirror
I: BERLIN
Three thousand German Greens bellowed and stamped their feet when
Joschka Fischer stepped on stage Sunday night. The polls had been
closed for hours and the general results were far from certain, but
the Berliners crowded into the Green election night party knew that,
at the very least, they had won over eight percent of the vote, which
meant they were the only clear winners at that moment.
They toasted their beloved foreign minister when he said, “Our
election goal was to be the third biggest party, and it’s clear that
we’ve reached that.” They cheered when he proclaimed that pragmatism
and principles aren’t mutually exclusive, and, as the night lengthened
and the result remained uncertain, they overflowed into the galleries
outside, where they bought beer and cocktails, wieners, ice cream and
cupcakes, and cheered and groaned as the two biggest parties – their
liberal Social Democrat allies and the conservative Christian Union –
traded a hairline lead back and forth.
But one thing was clear as the neck-and-neck race played out between
Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder’s coalition and the challengers: If he
won, the chancellor would owe his position to the Green vote.
That proved true when the complete results were announced at 3:45
a.m. – the Social Democrats and the Christian Union parties had each
polled about 38.5 percent. The Greens’ 8.6 percent had pushed their
coalition government into the majority and had also far exceeded the
minimum seven or eight percent that observers had called necessary for
them to claim victory and political stability. In one Berlin district,
they even took a parliamentary seat by majority appointment for the
first time.
The evening also proved Santa Monica Mayor – and U.S. Green Party
member – Michael Feinstein correct. “The German Greens are ahead of
the whole rest of the planet,” he had said before the election.
“Nobody is where they are.”
In stark contrast to American Greens, the German Greens have helped
set the majority agenda since 1998, when they won 6.7 percent of the
parliamentary vote and forged their ruling coalition with the Social
Democrats.
Feinstein calls them proof that political change is possible.
“One of the things Greens gain from looking around the world is the
realization that the Green Party appeals to many people and is
successful around the world where the voting system is fair,” he wrote
in a recent e-mail. “In this country, the left is decidedly
self-impotent electorally, not ever expecting to win. That’s why there
haven’t been any viable left-of-center third parties until the Greens,
because of the type of attitude people bring in. (They are happy to
fail‚ fighting the good fight.) So we Greens know we are onto
something much bigger and better, and the successes around the planet
give us the patience to tackle the highly undemocratic U.S. system.”
II. FREIBURG
In the German “enviro-capital“ Freiburg – a city of 200,000 located
in the country’s southwest corner – a longtime Green by the name of
Dieter Salomon occupies the top office in the centuries-old town hall.
As mayor of the largest city in which a Green is mayor, he could be
considered Feinstein’s direct counterpart. He pulled off a surprise
upset to win his office this summer, and he’s already been in his
share of fights with this university town’s radical left.
“I don’t have any contacts of my own [in America],” he said a few
weeks ago during an interview in Freiburg. Of the political activity
of the U.S. Green Party, he says, “There are Greens [here] who would
have no idea. You’d have to go to Berlin, and there would be three
people sitting in an international office who would have a clue. The
rest would not.“
Salomon has been Green his entire political life; at 42, he’s just
young enough to have entered politics when the party did, in the early
80s. He dresses to fit a new party stereotype: a suit-clad activist
grown older, mindful of the political establishment but still ready to
go jogging with Joschka on a stump trip.
“There’s a time for everything,” he said, discussing the party’s
occasionally tumultuous path from a loose coalition of sometimes
militant activists to a “normal party,” a party with political goals
and increasing appeal to older voters. “The Greens that exist today
would never have existed then.”
German Greens owe their success to two things, according to
Freiburg University political scientist Ulrich Eith, the first of
which was the inability of the established left to address
environmental issues when they became part of the national
consciousness in the late 1970s and early 1980s.
The Social Democrats couldn’t bend left because they were running
the government, he suggested, so the way was clear for the Greens to
step in.
A quirk of the German electoral system also works in their favor.
Proportional representation in the Bundestag is achieved by allowing
each district to elect one candidate directly and by a majority vote,
while a second vote determines the proportional allocation of
parliamentary seats. Parties which win at least five percent of the
second vote nationwide or three direct mandates are awarded a
proportionate number of parliamentary seats.
But during their four years as junior partner in the governing
coalition, outnumbered more than six-to-one by the Social Democrats in
the Bundestag, the Greens have had to deal with the same phenomenon
they had exploited a decade-and-a-half earlier: the difficulty of
governing and maintaining progressive principles at the same time.
Most divisive has been the issue of military action. Pacifism is a
basic Green principle, and committing German troops to action in
Kosovo and then Afghanistan – the first active duty for the Bundeswehr
since World War II – drew bitter criticism from the left. When Fischer
visited Freiburg three weeks before the vote, for example, it was not
the right-wing opposition but left-wing pacifists who protested during
his speech.
Voting for parties instead of individuals can also lead to some
campaign choices that might seem a little odd to American eyes, such
as when Freiburg Green candidate Kerstin Andreae, in a last-minute
strategic move, began urging her Green sympathizers to vote for Social
Democrat Gernot Erler instead. The reason? She feared the conservative
Christian Democrat candidate could win the district if liberal voters
split between Erler and herself, and she knew she’d get a seat in the
Bundestag anyway if the Greens could win enough party votes.
In a meeting a week-and-a-half before the vote, she and her staff
tried to figure out how to package the change without making it look
like she’d given up on her own race.
“The second vote is Kerstin’s vote,” one person suggested,
mimicking Fischer’s national campaign of “Second vote: Joschka’s
vote.” Too long, the campaign manager said, and they eventually
settled on the minimalist “second vote: Green.”
The strategy worked: Erler won Freiburg’s direct vote handily on
Sunday with 41.5 percent, while the Greens won 28.7 percent of the
second vote, the party vote. Thanks to the strong second-vote showing,
Andreae will get her own place in parliament as well.
III: SANTA MONICA
“I can say that I think the U.S. Greens have a lot to learn from
the German Greens who obviously have been involved in German politics
for a lot longer,” Santa Monica Green City Council candidate Josefina
Aranda said last week. “I believe that the Green Party in the U.S.
needs to learn how to maintain our ideological views and yet still
know how to do the fundraising, do the precinct-walking effectively,
so that we have more victories.”
Aranda is trying to break the Santa Monica political mold by
becoming the first Green to win a City Council seat without the
endorsement of Santa Monicans for Renters’ Rights. If she and current
Mayor Pro-Tempore Kevin McKeown – who is endorsed by SMRR – both win
their races, the Greens will hold three seats on the Santa Monica
Council. Aranda would also be the first representative of the Pico
neighborhood to sit on the Council in many years.
As a young Latina, she would add diversity to the Green slate,
something Feinstein calls representative of a new, broader appeal for
his party.
“The Green Party platform rang with what I believe in,“ Aranda
said. “I was disappointed with the two other parties, especially with
respect to issues pertaining to the Latino community, NAFTA being one
of them.”
But Aranda says she’s running an individual campaign, not a Green
one. “Santa Monica is a non-partisan race,” she maintained, “and
although people make it a big issue, the general public of Santa
Monica may not be interested in what party I’m from .... It takes more
than Green votes to win an election in Santa Monica. If you’re going
to run only on Green Party membership then you won’t get elected in
Santa Monica.”
IV: AMERICA
Some American Greens argue that their party will never break
through in American politics until the political system changes.
While the current national Green umbrella organization dates only
to 1996 and the National Committee was first recognized just over a
year ago, a loose American confederation of state and local Green
parties is much older – almost as old as the German movement. By their
own count, American Greens currently hold 152 offices nationwide (51
in California), almost all of which are at the local level. US Greens
sit on city councils, water boards, school boards and supervisory
seats, not in Beltway offices and statehouses.
“The problem is that the Democrats and the Republicans write the
rules,” Feinstein said. Like many other American Greens, he supports a
move toward proportional representation in the legislature, instant
runoff voting for the executive branch, public financing of elections
and inclusive television debates.
But ask him whether he operates as a Green in local politics, and
he hedges. “This is a green community, despite people’s party
affiliations,” he said.
“You have to find a place that embodies the philosophy and find
common ground,“ he added later. “When you look at the SMRR platform,
the platform is a Green platform.”
V: FREIBURG REDUX
Back in Freiburg, political expert Eith was no more familiar with
the specifics of local American Green party politics than were any of
the German Greens, and he expressed a mild bemusement at the idea of a
group of renters’ rights activists holding onto political power in a
town for two decades.
But he did have something to say when asked about the importance of
identity for a developing party.
“Of course it’s important,” he said. “You can build coalitions ...
but if you want to be successful in the long term you have to have
your own identity, and it has to be clear that the party will
represent its interests.” |
|