November 21, 2024 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Opinion: Ocean Glimpses All That’s Left From Our Cityscape

By Steve Stajich

There can be a lot of disagreement about what to use as a measuring stick for over-development. Some might say you can only know it when you see it. I would argue that you know it when you can’t see something. Like the ocean or the sky when high-rise buildings begin to block the sun.

About two weeks before Christmas, I was cruising down Ocean Drive in the area between Colorado and Pico. I was suddenly taken with the fact that development in that area now causes you to have no idea where the ocean is, because that strip has become a canyon of tall buildings. On both sides of the street tall buildings dominate to the point that you could be anywhere at all, especially Miami. It chills one to think that Santa Monica’s long-time efforts to stop buildings that would have created a wall blocking views of the ocean for all except those who are in hotels on the beach has simply switched the battlefield to the east side of Ocean Boulevard.

This feeling of our city closing in on us, of artificial canyons being created in what we might call our ‘skyscape’, is unfortunately available at other locations in our city. Main Street closes in on you as you drive north toward the “Dogtown” area. All of the construction in the hospital and medical area around St. John’s is now looming over Santa Monica Boulevard. Waiting for a light on 4th Street before crossing the bridge traveling north into downtown, there’s the new train station and then you are consumed by downtown building height.

None of this is to say that a city shouldn’t look like a city but if in fact being near the Pacific Ocean is a valuable lasting resource to our city, especially as it pertains to tourism, we need to wonder aloud if we are shutting down the views that confirm that there is in fact an ocean out there.

When the park across from City Hall opened, one of its features was a kind of open air observation deck where one can walk up and look out over the ocean. But I’m citing the simple fact that a raised observation deck was needed to remind people where they were less than one block from the beach.

Consciousness about over-development rises up on an almost proposed project-to-project basis. Yet I’m guessing that the city fathers of Big Sur rarely argue at length over whether a five or ten story hotel or office complex should rise up on its breathtaking shores. We should have the same kind of awareness that if Santa Monica becomes more and more developed with taller and taller buildings, our essential charm and any quintessence we might have as an ocean side community will slowly drain away. And in its place these monuments to prosperity will continue to rise, denigrating one of our singular quality of life features here: That an ocean lays before us.

During the holiday season, I drove down 4th Street going south and must admit to enjoying the holiday decorations and lights. But it also felt as though that scene could have been anywhere. We’re never going to lose the solid build-up downtown between 4th and the beach, just as Marina del Rey will never tear down the beach construction it sought and obtained by making room for more waterfront property by creating more waterfront. Still, it can be more than a little disheartening to wait for a red light at Lincoln near Mindanao and turn your head to take in the high rise condos that give only the ocean-side tenants any view of the water.

In New York City the problem is similar but vertical rather than horizontal. The wealthy want a “view” and obtain it by living higher off the ground. Of course they don’t worry about earthquakes the same way we do here. And New York is now almost by definition a city about making money, especially since we’ve elevated one of its developers to the office of President. That’s not us.

A city is just that. It’s not a wooded area or farm country. The long protected wetland area in Playa Vista was greatly reduced to make room for condos and apartments that are variously ornamented on their exteriors to look like classic building facades. Grass covered spaces between the buildings and foot paths through the remaining wetland appealed to potential buyers as “lifestyle” accoutrements. But we’re never getting that area back to its natural and first position, at least not in our lifetimes. Santa Monica must remain vigilant if encroaching, sun-blocking and sky-filling canyons of development are going to prevent us from remembering that we are a bay city.

in Opinion
<>Related Posts

S.M.a.r.t Column: Your City is Broke

November 18, 2024

November 18, 2024

On December 10, the new City council will be seated fresh from their dominant win in the recent elections. There...

SM.a.r.t Column: Moving Ahead to the Future

November 10, 2024

November 10, 2024

As we write this, the election results are still trickling in. We’ll leave the deep analysis to others, but the...

Opinion: Fact Check: Why Vote Yes on Measure QS

November 1, 2024

November 1, 2024

Despite living in a famously progressive region, Santa Monicans are not immune from the same political misinformation and disinformation that...

SM.a.r.t Column: Lack of Oversight and No Accountability

October 31, 2024

October 31, 2024

S.M.a.r.t. periodically invites guest columnists to write opinion articles on topics of particular interests to our readers. Below is an...

SM.a.r.t Column: “Help! I’ve Fallen, and I …!!”, Cries Santa Monica!

October 25, 2024

October 25, 2024

Maybe fallen, but slipping for sure from being a desirable beachfront community that served all equally, the local residents who...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Vote

October 13, 2024

October 13, 2024

In a polarized country or City every vote counts. Regardless of which side of any issue or candidate you support,...

SM.a.r.t Column: Fact-Checking Election-Season Windbaggery

October 6, 2024

October 6, 2024

Claim: The state is requiring Santa Monica to build 9,000 apartments.Answer: Partially true, partially false. Santa Monica has a pretty...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Public Safety and Traffic Enforcement Can Help Save Lives and Revitalize Santa Monica’s Economy

September 29, 2024

September 29, 2024

We wholeheartedly endorse the candidates below for Santa Monica City Council. Their leading campaign platform is for increased safety in...

SM.a.r.t Column: Crime in Santa Monica: A Growing Concern and the Need for Prioritizing Public Safety

September 22, 2024

September 22, 2024

By Michael Jolly Over the past six months, Santa Monica has experienced a concerning rise in crime, sparking heated discussions...

SM.a.r.t Column: Ten New Commandments

September 15, 2024

September 15, 2024

Starting last week,  the elementary school students of Louisiana will all face mandatory postings of the biblical Ten Commandments in...

SM.a.r.t Column: Santa Monica’s Next City Council

September 8, 2024

September 8, 2024

In the next general election, this November 5th, Santa Monica residents will be asked to vote their choices among an...

SM.a.r.t Column: Part II: The Affordability Crisis: Unmasking California’s RHNA Process and Its Role in Gentrification

September 2, 2024

September 2, 2024

Affordability: An Income and Available Asset Gap Issue, Not a Supply Issue (Last week’s article revealed how state mandates became...

SM.a.r.t Column: Part 1: The Affordability Crisis: Unmasking California’s RHNA Process and Its Role in Gentrification

August 26, 2024

August 26, 2024

In the world of economic policy, good intentions often pave the way to unintended consequences. Nowhere is this more evident...

SM.a.r.t Column: They Want to Build a Wall

August 18, 2024

August 18, 2024

Every once in a while, a topic arises that we had previously written about but doesn’t seem to go away....

SM.a.r.t Column: Sharks vs. Batteries – Part 5 of 5

August 11, 2024

August 11, 2024

This is the last SMart article in an expanding  5 part series about our City’s power, water, and food prospects....