Email List

To join our e-mail list, please enter your e-mail address. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Shows

Sections

Classifieds

Directories

Contact

The Santa Monica City Council will begin fleshing out the City’s options of Santa Monica Airport’s future this week.
Courtesy Of The City Of Santa Monica
The Santa Monica City Council will begin fleshing out the City’s options of Santa Monica Airport’s future this week.

News, Santa Monica, Santa Monica Airport

Santa Monica Airport Future To Headline City Council Meeting This Tuesday

Posted Mar. 24, 2014, 8:55 am

Parimal M. Rohit / Staff Writer

The year 2015 is around the corner, meaning it is almost high time for the City of Santa Monica to decide how to proceed with Santa Monica Airport (SMO). This Tuesday, the City Council will discuss the airport’s future at its meeting.

With about 15 months left on the clock until a 1984 agreement between City Hall and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) expires, the council could be putting the wheels in motion to take definitive action of whether SMO will continue to operate as is or be shut down in some capacity.

Yet with a recent federal decision disputing Santa Monica’s claim to ownership of airport property, neither City Hall nor the FAA appears to be any closer to an affirmative decision of how to move forward.

“For years, community members assumed that the City could close the Airport in 2015 when the 1984 agreement with the federal government will expire,” City staff stated in a report to council members. “However, it is now clear that legal disputes about the City’s authority to close the Airport will inevitably extend well beyond 2015, and their outcome is uncertain. Beyond the legal controversies, some level of environmental assessment would likely be required to close all or part of the Airport and that would take time.”

Though definitive action on the future of SMO may not come about by July 1, 2015 as previously advertised, City Hall hopes to use the potential extra time in coming to a resolution to its advantage.

“This time can be used to begin preparing potential work plans clarifying the scope of work that would be necessary,” City staff stated, adding it hopes the council will take advantage of the extra time to “begin formulating work plans related to possible closure.”

Accordingly, City staff and council members will discuss several SMO-themed topics this Tuesday, including the possible preparation of conceptual renderings of a smaller airport, determining whether to eliminate or place conditions on flight schools, exploring the limitation or elimination of fuel sales, and looking into how to either close SMO or reduce its adverse impacts.

“The FAA contends that the City cannot close the Airport when the 1984 Agreement expires because the City will remain obligated to operate the Airport by both the last grant that the City accepted for Airport improvements in 1994 and by the Instrument of Transfer,” City staff stated. “As to the grant, the FAA contends that it obligates the City until 2023, while the City contends that the last grant was made on June 6, 1994 and expires on June 5th of this year.”

City staff continued even if it were not obligated to keep SMO open until 2023, the federal government maintains the 1948 Instrument of Transfer requires Santa Monica “to operate the Airport in perpetuity.”

Should a federal judge determine the FAA grant agreements do not expire until 2023, SMO would remain open for at least nine more years – longer if issues pertaining to the Instrument of Transfer are not resolved within that time.

“If the FAA ultimately prevails in its argument that the Instrument of Transfer requires the City to operate the Airport in perpetuity, the City will not be able to unilaterally close the Airport,” City staff stated.

As to where the Santa Monica stands with SMO, City staff states the airport definitely must remain open for now since the 1994 grant conditions still have yet to expire and the 1984 Settlement Agreement continues through June 30, 2015.

“Definitive City action to close all or part of the Airport will very likely result in the FAA and likely also the aviation community instituting legal proceedings,” City staff stated. “The exact nature of their actions cannot be predicted with certainty and would likely depend on exactly what action the City took.”

The council will begin fleshing out the City’s options of SMO’s future next week. However, the discussion is just the tip of a massive iceberg as City staff predicts the legal fight over the airport’s future will take several years.

Post a comment

Comments

Mar. 24, 2014, 11:58:04 am

0riz said...

The Santa Monica Airport can not be closed because of Bombardier and Buffett who are using it commercially in a way to make themselves little bit more money onto our expense with a lot of help from their agents within FAA.

Mar. 24, 2014, 1:54:05 pm

Truth said...

Yep, you're absolutely right. This is about money. Homeowners who want to improve the value of their houses, developers who want the land, council members who want campaign contributions and corporations who want to park their jets close to home. Whoever has the deepest pockets will "win". Welcome to America.

Mar. 24, 2014, 3:42:14 pm

michael said...

Just was wondering if any thought was given to the emergency use the airport would provide in the case of a major earthquake. With all major roads impassable for days the airport could become a major life line to the city of Santa Monica and its residents. With a 5000 ft runway it could accommodate C-17 heavy lift aircraft or C -131 which could provide medical evacuations and emergency supplies to the city. It doesn't take much imagination to think of a worst case scenario where the airport could take a major role in saving the lives of many people in such a disaster.

Mar. 24, 2014, 7:34:00 pm

Santa Monicans please read said...

http://smdp.com/letter-santa-monica-airport-an-asset/133284

Mar. 24, 2014, 10:52:22 pm

But the truth is said...

Butlegging is what is going on here. It is the corruption not the corporations in need of the ilegit chartering.

Mar. 25, 2014, 4:12:51 pm

Liz Forsman said...

We often fly into Santa Monica for family visits, but besides that, the airport should stay open for emergency uses, life Flight, etc. ZI support the airport community! I can not attend the meeting tonight, hope many others do.

Mar. 25, 2014, 9:35:11 pm

Jerry Knuth said...

When people talk about parks in SM they leave out the beach. If the beach is counted SM has some of the highest parks/resident or SQ Mi of any city. When El Toro airbase was closed it was promised to be a park. Now condos and commercial development are there. If SMO is closed a small token amount probably will be converted to a park, but most of it will be sold off for development. Development will be necessary to pay for the park. If the entire airport was converted to a park the size of Golden Gate Park in SF where would the City come up with the money for on going operations and maintenance, security etc. As far as airport pollution, what about the pollution from the freeways and streets around the airport and the flights overhead going to LAX. Should'nt we be closing the freeway and major streets comming into santa monica. Should those whose real estate values go up from closing the airport be assessed a tax to help cover the costs of closing the airport and operating a park?

Mar. 26, 2014, 3:53:02 pm

Harry Grace said...

Wondering how many concerned about their property values owned their property before the airport was there? Did you buy and all of a sudden realize there was an airport? This facility is historic (see The Douglas World Cruiser) and an asset to the community and part of the 'commons' we all own. Keep the Airport safe for all

SM Mirror TV