April 19, 2024 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

City Council’s Successes Chronicled:

Michael Feinstein, Santa Monica City Council Member

Last week, the Mirror misreported my position on a critical March 7th housing policy vote, incorrectly implying that I was out of step with neighborhood concerns on development. In fact, I did not vote in favor of increased development standards as the Mirror suggested, and I have been an ally of residents against overdevelopment for many years.

At issue last week was inclusion of affordable housing units on-site within multi-family housing projects. State law already provides for a ‘density bonus’ of extra units, if a developer includes an affordable unit on-site. City staff had analyzed the city’s applicable development standards, and suggested that to provide still further incentives to developers, buildings could be wider, higher, contain more floors and provide less guest parking.

I voted ‘no’ on these proposed changes, arguing that we should not negatively impact neighborhoods with such increased densities. I pointed out that there were other ways to achieve affordable units on-site that do not threaten neighborhood character. Inexplicably, this was reported as ‘defending the density measure’.

It’s always important to correct the record on significant votes. In this light, I also want to respond to recent Mirror editorials suggesting the entire current City Council is being unresponsive to, and is uninterested in, resident concerns.

Last Tuesday’s vote demonstrated the Council’s awareness of issues of scale and character in the multi-family neighborhoods. A year ago, the Council successfully addressed the same issues in the single-family neighborhood North of Montana Ave., regarding the so-called ‘Monster Mansions’. In both cases, the council listened closely to community concerns about overdevelopment and quality of life.

These kind of City Council responses have led one prominent neighborhood organization board member to email Council members after last week’s vote, saying “if you folks keep being this responsive, pretty soon we community activists types won’t have anything to complain about.”

Contrast that ‘pro-neighborhood attitude’ with that of the previous City Council from 1996-1998. It was only a couple of years ago, that then-Councilmembers Ebner, Rosenstein, Holbrook and Greenberg voted to defund Santa Monica’s neighborhood organizations, and end the city’s proud 15+ year history of directly supporting resident involvement through their neighborhood organizations.

In 1999, the current City Council reinstated funding for the neighborhood groups, and the City Manager dedicated part of a key staff member’s time to liasoning with the neighborhood groups. The city also developed the Leadership Series, which is dedicated to bringing residents into the process through seminars devoted to explaining in depth how city government works. After this clear and renewed city support, there are now neighborhood organizations in every neighborhood for the first time ever.

Just a few weeks ago, these organizations came together to the Council with a set of recommendations on how residents could be better informed about city process. The Council’s response? Without hesitation, it immediately directed the City Manager’s office to work with various City departments to see how to address these goals.

Even before this request came, Councilmember McKeown and myself have been closely working with our Information Systems Department to develop a Web Information Network (WIN), to provide residents better and easier access to their government. Among its features, WIN will contain an ‘email noticing system’, where any community member can choose from a menu of topics and then automatically receive email notices with information on city events and meetings, as well as staff reports on topics of their choice.

In addition to addressing development concerns, the new Council has also conducted successful neighborhood processes in the Pico neighborhood. The first brought to a conclusion, the long-awaited final plan for the Virginia Avenue Park expansion, incorporating a great number of ideas that came from community advisory members.

A second process involved a high-level inter-departmental city staff team assigned to the Pico neighborhood as a whole, working with a 30-member Pico Neighborhood Advisory Council on quality of life issues there. Many viable ideas came out of this process. Some have already been included in the current year’s budget and others are contemplated for next year and beyond. This effort was so successful, that a similar effort is being considered by the City Council for the South Beach neighborhood next year.

No City Council is perfect and there is always room to be even better. But I do believe it not accurate to suggest, as the Mirror has, that this Council is not responsive to neighborhood concerns, especially at this critical juncture in our city’s evolution.

In particular, unlike its immediate predecessor City Council (that had a very different political majority), this City Council has undertaken bold measures to respond to the immense development pressures the city is undergoing. The Council has moved to preserve affordable housing and economic diversity in our residential areas, to respect the scale of our neighborhoods, and to preserve the best of our architectural heritage there, while ensuring that new development complements what we already have.

In our commercial areas, while the new Council has not approved any major new developments, the city is unfortunately feeling the impacts of unnecessarily large developments like the Water Gardens and Arboretum, which were approved by a pro-overdevelopment City Council more than ten years ago, but are only now being built. We are saddled with that legacy, along with being surrounded by poor planning choices in neighboring Los Angeles. Our efforts to expand local bus service by 20%, and improve pedestrian safety by adding and enhancing crosswalks citywide are significant responses. But they can’t make excessively large developments already built go away.

However, one large development that was approved several years ago won’t happen — the giant commercial office park along Ocean Ave. that RAND was going to build. The Council’s historic acquisition last year of 11.4 acres of RAND property – of which I was a driving force (and which was approved by all Council members except Rosenstein) – means we can now substitute public open space and parks, in place of unneeded development that would have clogged our streets with additional traffic and parking problems. I also successfully brought a motion to the Council (approved by all except Rosenstein and Holbrook) for the City to explore ways of opposing the immense Playa Vista project in nearby Los Angeles, which, if built, would negatively impact Sunset Park and Ocean Park with its pass-through traffic, as well as worsen the traffic and parking situation on Lincoln Bl.

These are the kind of gutsy moves that are not just responsive to neighborhood concerns, but are proactive in support of them. In the last three elections, residents have responded to overdevelopment approved by past City Councils, by electing three new members – myself and Council members McKeown and Bloom – who all came from leadership positions in their respective neighborhood organizations, and who all ran on controlling overdevelopment. Ten years from now, no one wants tolook back and say ‘what if?’, while we lament the loss of our quality of life. The majority on this City Council understands this, and is trying to do everything it can. If there is more we can do, we want to know about it. We live here too.

in Opinion
Related Posts

SM.a.r.t. Column: Santa Monica Needs Responsible Urban and Architectural Design

April 14, 2024

April 14, 2024

[SMa.r.t. note: Eight years ago, our highly esteemed and recently-passed colleague Ron Goldman documented his thoughts on the need for...

SM.a.r.t. Column: BLINK NOW!

April 7, 2024

April 7, 2024

Nine years ago, I wrote a column for SMa.r.t. titled SANTA MONICA: BEACH TOWN OR ‘DINGBAT’ CITY? (https://smdp.com/2015/05/09/santa-monica-beach-town-dingbat-city/)Here is the...

SM.a.r.t Column: ARB Courage (Part 2 of 2)

March 31, 2024

March 31, 2024

Last week we discussed the numerous flaws of the Gelson’s project as a perfect example of what not to do...

ARB Courage (Part 1 of 2)

March 24, 2024

March 24, 2024

On March 4, 2024, your ARB (Architectural Review Board) ruled in favor of the 521-unit Gelson’s Project at Ocean Park...

SM.a.r.t Column: Can California ARBs Balance Affordable Housing with Community Character in the Face of New Housing Laws?

March 17, 2024

March 17, 2024

By suggestion, I attended the March 4th ARB (Architectural Review Board) meeting that addressed the Gelson Lincoln Boulevard Project.  After...

S.M.a.r.t Column: On the Need for Safety

March 10, 2024

March 10, 2024

Earlier this week, in the dark pre-dawn hours, a pair of thugs covered in masks and hoodies burst into the...

Film Review: The Oscar Landscape 2024

March 7, 2024

March 7, 2024

FILM REVIEWTHE OSCAR LANDSCAPE 2024A Look at the Choices – Academy Awards – March 10, 2024, at 5:00 p.m. on...

S.M.a.r.t Column: Five Saving Historic Santa Monica

March 3, 2024

March 3, 2024

Our beloved City is surrounded by many threats, from sea level rise to homelessness, to housing affordability, to cancerous overdevelopment,...

S.M.a.r.t Column: Gelson’s Looms Large

February 22, 2024

February 22, 2024

Our guest column this week is by SMCLC (the Santa Monica Coalition for a Livable City). SMCLC is a well-established...

S.M.a.r.t Column: Top Toady Town

February 18, 2024

February 18, 2024

Throughout history, from the ancient Romans and Assyrians to Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine, siege warfare has served as an...

S.M.a.r.t Column: The Sunset of Home Ownership

February 11, 2024

February 11, 2024

We are watching the sunset of our historical and cultural American dream of home ownership as we now are crossing...

SMa.r.t. Column: B(U)Y RIGHT

February 4, 2024

February 4, 2024

“By Right” state housing laws that give developers, in certain projects, the ability to ignore codes ‘by right.’ Well, that...

S.M.a.r.t  Column: Serf City

January 28, 2024

January 28, 2024

Homelessness is a problem in California, and nowhere is this more evident than in our fair city, where the unhoused...

S.M.a.r.t  Column: Bond Fatigue

January 22, 2024

January 22, 2024

Last week’s SMart article,  described two critical problems faced by our Santa Monica Malibu Unified School District (SMMUSD): the declining...

S.M.a.r.t Column: Peace on Earth

December 27, 2023

December 27, 2023

We are all, by now, saturated with jingles, holiday cards, “ho ho ho’s,” countless commercial advertisements, and exhortations to feel...