May 27, 2022 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Letters to the Editor:

Dear Editor,

My husband and I totally agree with Carol E. Siegle regarding the traffic situation in Santa Monica. We could not have said it any better. I read her letter this morning after surviving another disastorous traffic situation last night.

Santa Monica Place open[ed] officially [Friday, Aug. 6], but I had received an invitation from Bloomingdale’s for a special sneak preview a day earlier. To avoid the opening day madness and masses of people, we decided to go last night. The traffic moved fine until we got to Lincoln and Colorado, where it became to a stand still. We had also forgotten that there was a musical event on the Pier. We endured the traffic jam for half of an hour, which it took to reach 6th Street. We gave up and headed north on 6th until Wilshire Boulevard, turned west on Wilshire and discovered the public parking structure north of Wilshire on 4th Street was full. We ended parking at the 2nd Street structure between Wilshire and Arizona Avenue. We walked to Bloomingdale’s and saw that the structure between Arizona and Santa Monica Boulevard as well between Santa Monica Boulevard and Broadway were full.

I feel strongly that [this] disaster sealed my decision to stay away from downtown Santa Monica. And just wait when the [Exposition Light Rail] arrives to Santa Monica. I am very much in favor of public transportation… [but it] is going to bring to Santa Monica these huge and monsterous briges and construction which you can already see on La Cienega Boulevard and along Jefferson Boulevard. There goes the charm of Santa Monica.

I will continue shopping at Bloomingdale at Century City and for some time already I have been doing my banking by Westside Pavilion. Both City Bank and Chase are close by and the post office inside the pavilion. And as a bonus I often purchase movie tickets for the night, since Landmark has numbered reserved seats. And now, that’s what I call civilized.

Mirja Covarrubias, Santa Monica

Dear Editor,

Those who recently joined Santa Monicans for Renter’s Rights (SMRR) solely to pursue endorsement of one particular candidate while blocking endorsement of other candidates have been dismayed to learn that SMRR is bigger than any one faction and beyond their ability to manipulate or control.

SMRR is at its core a tenant protection and advocacy organization. Thousands of Santa Monica residents belong to SMRR and rely on the organization to protect their homes and their quality of life. On non-tenant protection issues, SMRR will only take a stand when there is strong consensus within the organization, as there is regarding SMRR’s support for the schools. When a consensus fails to emerge on a non-tenant issue, such as the development issues surrounding Prop T, SMRR leaders and members will generally agree not to take an official position. We recognize that people of good will can hold different views on one or more secondary issues, and that SMRR as an organization is more important than any faction within SMRR. As long as we continue to agree on our core goals and principles, we can all move forward together.

This brings us to the 2010 election campaign and the Steering Committee’s decision to support previously SMRR endorsed candidates in addition to those endorsed at the convention. By adding candidates who have consistently supported rent control and worked hard to protect tenants, the Steering Committee fulfilled one of its most important responsibilities to the broader SMRR membership. It is a responsibility that the Steering Committee does not take lightly, but also one that we will not shy away from because of complaints from outsiders or from newly minted SMRR members who may not share our deep commitment to SMRR’s platform and core values. It is part of a democratic system of checks and balances has helped SMRR remain vibrant for more than 30 years.

SMRR is a diverse and welcoming organization. We are renters and homeowners of all ages and backgrounds. We suggest that those who are less familiar with SMRR visit our website www.smrr.org to read our platform and learn more about SMRR’s role in the community. We are pleased to welcome new members from every neighborhood who want to roll up their sleeves and work with us on behalf of tenants and all residents of Santa Monica.

Sonya Fox Sultan,

SMRR Steering Committee

in Opinion
Related Posts

​​Doubt Removed: Oil Refiners Gouging Us

May 23, 2022

May 23, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist There was some room for doubt back in February, when gasoline prices rose precipitously: Until the...

Is the Big Housing Crunch Mostly Fiction?

May 20, 2022

May 20, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist In some parts of California, there is definitely a housing crunch: small supplies of homes for...

Is Gelson’s Our Future? Bigger Is Not Better & Not Necessary! – Part 2

May 20, 2022

May 20, 2022

The dream of our beachfront city is about to become a nightmare! Just imagine a tsunami of these projects washing...

Column From Santa Monica Mayor Himmelrich: We Walk the Talk

May 12, 2022

May 12, 2022

By Sue Himmelrich, Santa Moncia Mayor  I like the SMa.r.t. architects. I often agree with them. But in allowing Mark...

Is Gelson’s Our Future? Bigger Is Not Better!

May 12, 2022

May 12, 2022

It’s appalling to see what’s happening in our city – projects recently built or about to be approved – in...

Renting Your Second Home

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

If you are among the many Americans who own a second home that you occasionally use as a vacation getaway,...

Column: Cities Fight to Maintain Distinctive Characters

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist Anyone who knows California well will realize that Palo Alto does not look much like nearby...

SMa.r.t. Column: Gelson’s, Boxed-In

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

This week we are re-visiting an article from 2018 regarding the Miramar project, by simply replacing the word “Miramar” with...

Column: Are You Talking Yourself Out of Saving for Retirement? Here’s How to Break the Habit

May 5, 2022

May 5, 2022

Saving for retirement can be an abstract concept. It’s something we all know we should do, but the farther away...

SMa.r.t. Column: Failure to Plan…

April 30, 2022

April 30, 2022

Over the last approximately two years your City has been busy trying to respond to new California laws that are...

Letter to Editor: Your “Standing Firm With Santa Monica” Initiative

April 25, 2022

April 25, 2022

The following is an open letter to Councilmember Sue Himmelrich from Santa Monica resident Arthur Jeon regarding a proposed transfer...

SMa.r.t. Column: Planning The Real Future

April 24, 2022

April 24, 2022

In the 1970s, renowned USC architecture professor Ralph Knowles developed a method for planning and designing cities that would dramatically...

SMa.r.t. Column: New City Financial Plan: The Resident Homeowner Bank

April 15, 2022

April 15, 2022

Part II: Who pays the proposed transfer tax and where does the money go? Last week, we introduced the proposed...

Column: NIMBYs Getting a Bad Rap

April 8, 2022

April 8, 2022

By Tom Elias Rarely has a major group of Californians suffered a less deserved rash of insults and attacks than...

SMa.r.t. Column: New City Financial Plan – The Resident Homeowner Bank

April 8, 2022

April 8, 2022

Part 1 of 2 In this two-part article, we will discuss both the proposed transfer tax ballot initiative and the...