April 19, 2024 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Letter to the Editor:

Dear Editor,

I am greatly concerned that our city has replaced its historic sound fiscal management with reckless spending on excessive salaries for City employees. The new City Manager (CEO of a city of 85,000), who is paid 20 percent more than the Mayor of Los Angeles (CEO of a city of 3.5 Million), has called for a new $12,000,000 sales tax, in the middle of the worst recession in 70 years. This sales tax is apparently needed because it is projected that in future years the city will be unable to sustain its growth in spending.

Going through the City’s budget, I found that approximately 3/4ths of all City expenditures go to the salary and benefits for City employees. On the City’s website is 116 pages of job classifications with the average job exceeding $70,000/year, with many jobs paying over $100,000/year, and top employees making between $250,000 and $300,000/year. These salaries are way in excess of the salaries of the vast majority of the people who live in Santa Monica. Is it fair to charge a special tax, on all residents of Santa Monica, to subsidize the income of wealthier people?

Another consideration is that we are in the most severe recession in two generations. Our state is experiencing unemployment between 12 and 13 percent, and when you count recent college graduates who have never worked, people who have given up looking for work, and people who a working part-time because they cannot find full time work, we are at a number that is close to 20 percent.

In contrast, the unemployment rate of Santa Monica city workers is 0 percent; not only has there been no layoffs, but the City has been adding jobs during the middle of this recession. In addition, virtually all of us, who have been lucky enough to keep our jobs, have experienced a significant decline in our incomes. In contrast, the City’s website shows that the minimum salaries, of Santa Monica employees, have increased by 6.1 percent to 6.6 percent, depending on the job.

Doing a little math, the salary increases have been approximately 6.3 percent. Three-fourth of the City’s $554,000,000 budget, equals $26,000,000/year. If that $26 million/year overcharge was reversed, the City fiscal problem would be immediately solved, with plenty of extra money to help out the school district. Is it fair for City employees to be able to enjoy full employment, and big pay increases, while everyone else is suffering from the worst recession in two generations? Is it not throwing salt on the wounds of all the residents of Santa Monica who have less, to be asked to pay a special tax, to allow City staff to ignore the reality of today’s economy?

Jeff Segal, Santa Monica

in Opinion
Related Posts

SM.a.r.t. Column: Santa Monica Needs Responsible Urban and Architectural Design

April 14, 2024

April 14, 2024

[SMa.r.t. note: Eight years ago, our highly esteemed and recently-passed colleague Ron Goldman documented his thoughts on the need for...

SM.a.r.t. Column: BLINK NOW!

April 7, 2024

April 7, 2024

Nine years ago, I wrote a column for SMa.r.t. titled SANTA MONICA: BEACH TOWN OR ‘DINGBAT’ CITY? (https://smdp.com/2015/05/09/santa-monica-beach-town-dingbat-city/)Here is the...

SM.a.r.t Column: ARB Courage (Part 2 of 2)

March 31, 2024

March 31, 2024

Last week we discussed the numerous flaws of the Gelson’s project as a perfect example of what not to do...

ARB Courage (Part 1 of 2)

March 24, 2024

March 24, 2024

On March 4, 2024, your ARB (Architectural Review Board) ruled in favor of the 521-unit Gelson’s Project at Ocean Park...

SM.a.r.t Column: Can California ARBs Balance Affordable Housing with Community Character in the Face of New Housing Laws?

March 17, 2024

March 17, 2024

By suggestion, I attended the March 4th ARB (Architectural Review Board) meeting that addressed the Gelson Lincoln Boulevard Project.  After...

S.M.a.r.t Column: On the Need for Safety

March 10, 2024

March 10, 2024

Earlier this week, in the dark pre-dawn hours, a pair of thugs covered in masks and hoodies burst into the...

Film Review: The Oscar Landscape 2024

March 7, 2024

March 7, 2024

FILM REVIEWTHE OSCAR LANDSCAPE 2024A Look at the Choices – Academy Awards – March 10, 2024, at 5:00 p.m. on...

S.M.a.r.t Column: Five Saving Historic Santa Monica

March 3, 2024

March 3, 2024

Our beloved City is surrounded by many threats, from sea level rise to homelessness, to housing affordability, to cancerous overdevelopment,...

S.M.a.r.t Column: Gelson’s Looms Large

February 22, 2024

February 22, 2024

Our guest column this week is by SMCLC (the Santa Monica Coalition for a Livable City). SMCLC is a well-established...

S.M.a.r.t Column: Top Toady Town

February 18, 2024

February 18, 2024

Throughout history, from the ancient Romans and Assyrians to Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine, siege warfare has served as an...

S.M.a.r.t Column: The Sunset of Home Ownership

February 11, 2024

February 11, 2024

We are watching the sunset of our historical and cultural American dream of home ownership as we now are crossing...

SMa.r.t. Column: B(U)Y RIGHT

February 4, 2024

February 4, 2024

“By Right” state housing laws that give developers, in certain projects, the ability to ignore codes ‘by right.’ Well, that...

S.M.a.r.t  Column: Serf City

January 28, 2024

January 28, 2024

Homelessness is a problem in California, and nowhere is this more evident than in our fair city, where the unhoused...

S.M.a.r.t  Column: Bond Fatigue

January 22, 2024

January 22, 2024

Last week’s SMart article,  described two critical problems faced by our Santa Monica Malibu Unified School District (SMMUSD): the declining...

S.M.a.r.t Column: Peace on Earth

December 27, 2023

December 27, 2023

We are all, by now, saturated with jingles, holiday cards, “ho ho ho’s,” countless commercial advertisements, and exhortations to feel...