June 22, 2024 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Letter to the Editor:

Dear Editor,

I am greatly concerned that our city has replaced its historic sound fiscal management with reckless spending on excessive salaries for City employees. The new City Manager (CEO of a city of 85,000), who is paid 20 percent more than the Mayor of Los Angeles (CEO of a city of 3.5 Million), has called for a new $12,000,000 sales tax, in the middle of the worst recession in 70 years. This sales tax is apparently needed because it is projected that in future years the city will be unable to sustain its growth in spending.

Going through the City’s budget, I found that approximately 3/4ths of all City expenditures go to the salary and benefits for City employees. On the City’s website is 116 pages of job classifications with the average job exceeding $70,000/year, with many jobs paying over $100,000/year, and top employees making between $250,000 and $300,000/year. These salaries are way in excess of the salaries of the vast majority of the people who live in Santa Monica. Is it fair to charge a special tax, on all residents of Santa Monica, to subsidize the income of wealthier people?

Another consideration is that we are in the most severe recession in two generations. Our state is experiencing unemployment between 12 and 13 percent, and when you count recent college graduates who have never worked, people who have given up looking for work, and people who a working part-time because they cannot find full time work, we are at a number that is close to 20 percent.

In contrast, the unemployment rate of Santa Monica city workers is 0 percent; not only has there been no layoffs, but the City has been adding jobs during the middle of this recession. In addition, virtually all of us, who have been lucky enough to keep our jobs, have experienced a significant decline in our incomes. In contrast, the City’s website shows that the minimum salaries, of Santa Monica employees, have increased by 6.1 percent to 6.6 percent, depending on the job.

Doing a little math, the salary increases have been approximately 6.3 percent. Three-fourth of the City’s $554,000,000 budget, equals $26,000,000/year. If that $26 million/year overcharge was reversed, the City fiscal problem would be immediately solved, with plenty of extra money to help out the school district. Is it fair for City employees to be able to enjoy full employment, and big pay increases, while everyone else is suffering from the worst recession in two generations? Is it not throwing salt on the wounds of all the residents of Santa Monica who have less, to be asked to pay a special tax, to allow City staff to ignore the reality of today’s economy?

Jeff Segal, Santa Monica

in Opinion
Related Posts

SM.a.r.t Column: The Up Zoning Scam (Part 1)

June 16, 2024

June 16, 2024

Over the last few years, the State of California has mandated a massive upzoning of cities to create capacity for...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Shape Up – On Steroids

June 9, 2024

June 9, 2024

Nine years ago, SMa.r.t wrote a series of articles addressing the adaptive re-use of existing structures. We titled one “Shape...

SM.a.r.t Column: The Challenge of Running a City When City Staff Have Different Priorities

June 2, 2024

June 2, 2024

Living in a city has its perks, but it can be a real headache when the folks running the show...

SM.a.r.t. Column: A Path to Affordable Ownership in Santa Monica

May 27, 2024

May 27, 2024

[Note: our guest author today is Andres Drobny, a former Professor of Economics at the University of London, the former...

SM.a.r.t. Column: A Path Forward for Santa Monica: Part II

May 19, 2024

May 19, 2024

As referenced in Part I of this article, the state’s use of faulty statistics and forceful legislation has left a...

SM.a.r.t. Column: A Path Forward for Santa Monica: Part I

May 12, 2024

May 12, 2024

To quickly summarize, California grapples with an ongoing housing crisis spurred by state implementation of over 100 policies and mandates...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Where Will Our Huddled Masses Sleep? Navigating California’s Affordable Housing Mandates

May 5, 2024

May 5, 2024

Just as Lady Liberty beckons the “huddled masses” of immigrants to America, cities like Santa Monica have an ethical obligation...

SM.a.r.t Column: SMCLC SPEAKS

April 28, 2024

April 28, 2024

SMart (Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow) periodically invites guest columnists who have made a significant contribution to the...

SM.a.r.t Column: Building Modern Boxes Lacks Identity

April 21, 2024

April 21, 2024

In the relentless pursuit of modernity, cities worldwide have witnessed the rise of so-called architectural marvels in the form of...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Santa Monica Needs Responsible Urban and Architectural Design

April 14, 2024

April 14, 2024

[SMa.r.t. note: Eight years ago, our highly esteemed and recently-passed colleague Ron Goldman documented his thoughts on the need for...

SM.a.r.t. Column: BLINK NOW!

April 7, 2024

April 7, 2024

Nine years ago, I wrote a column for SMa.r.t. titled SANTA MONICA: BEACH TOWN OR ‘DINGBAT’ CITY? (https://smdp.com/2015/05/09/santa-monica-beach-town-dingbat-city/)Here is the...

SM.a.r.t Column: ARB Courage (Part 2 of 2)

March 31, 2024

March 31, 2024

Last week we discussed the numerous flaws of the Gelson’s project as a perfect example of what not to do...

ARB Courage (Part 1 of 2)

March 24, 2024

March 24, 2024

On March 4, 2024, your ARB (Architectural Review Board) ruled in favor of the 521-unit Gelson’s Project at Ocean Park...

SM.a.r.t Column: Can California ARBs Balance Affordable Housing with Community Character in the Face of New Housing Laws?

March 17, 2024

March 17, 2024

By suggestion, I attended the March 4th ARB (Architectural Review Board) meeting that addressed the Gelson Lincoln Boulevard Project.  After...

S.M.a.r.t Column: On the Need for Safety

March 10, 2024

March 10, 2024

Earlier this week, in the dark pre-dawn hours, a pair of thugs covered in masks and hoodies burst into the...