May 20, 2022 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Letter to the Editor:

Dear Editor,

I am greatly concerned that our city has replaced its historic sound fiscal management with reckless spending on excessive salaries for City employees. The new City Manager (CEO of a city of 85,000), who is paid 20 percent more than the Mayor of Los Angeles (CEO of a city of 3.5 Million), has called for a new $12,000,000 sales tax, in the middle of the worst recession in 70 years. This sales tax is apparently needed because it is projected that in future years the city will be unable to sustain its growth in spending.

Going through the City’s budget, I found that approximately 3/4ths of all City expenditures go to the salary and benefits for City employees. On the City’s website is 116 pages of job classifications with the average job exceeding $70,000/year, with many jobs paying over $100,000/year, and top employees making between $250,000 and $300,000/year. These salaries are way in excess of the salaries of the vast majority of the people who live in Santa Monica. Is it fair to charge a special tax, on all residents of Santa Monica, to subsidize the income of wealthier people?

Another consideration is that we are in the most severe recession in two generations. Our state is experiencing unemployment between 12 and 13 percent, and when you count recent college graduates who have never worked, people who have given up looking for work, and people who a working part-time because they cannot find full time work, we are at a number that is close to 20 percent.

In contrast, the unemployment rate of Santa Monica city workers is 0 percent; not only has there been no layoffs, but the City has been adding jobs during the middle of this recession. In addition, virtually all of us, who have been lucky enough to keep our jobs, have experienced a significant decline in our incomes. In contrast, the City’s website shows that the minimum salaries, of Santa Monica employees, have increased by 6.1 percent to 6.6 percent, depending on the job.

Doing a little math, the salary increases have been approximately 6.3 percent. Three-fourth of the City’s $554,000,000 budget, equals $26,000,000/year. If that $26 million/year overcharge was reversed, the City fiscal problem would be immediately solved, with plenty of extra money to help out the school district. Is it fair for City employees to be able to enjoy full employment, and big pay increases, while everyone else is suffering from the worst recession in two generations? Is it not throwing salt on the wounds of all the residents of Santa Monica who have less, to be asked to pay a special tax, to allow City staff to ignore the reality of today’s economy?

Jeff Segal, Santa Monica

in Opinion
Related Posts

Column From Santa Monica Mayor Himmelrich: We Walk the Talk

May 12, 2022

May 12, 2022

By Sue Himmelrich, Santa Moncia Mayor  I like the SMa.r.t. architects. I often agree with them. But in allowing Mark...

Is Gelson’s Our Future? Bigger Is Not Better!

May 12, 2022

May 12, 2022

It’s appalling to see what’s happening in our city – projects recently built or about to be approved – in...

Renting Your Second Home

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

If you are among the many Americans who own a second home that you occasionally use as a vacation getaway,...

Column: Cities Fight to Maintain Distinctive Characters

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist Anyone who knows California well will realize that Palo Alto does not look much like nearby...

SMa.r.t. Column: Gelson’s, Boxed-In

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

This week we are re-visiting an article from 2018 regarding the Miramar project, by simply replacing the word “Miramar” with...

Column: Are You Talking Yourself Out of Saving for Retirement? Here’s How to Break the Habit

May 5, 2022

May 5, 2022

Saving for retirement can be an abstract concept. It’s something we all know we should do, but the farther away...

SMa.r.t. Column: Failure to Plan…

April 30, 2022

April 30, 2022

Over the last approximately two years your City has been busy trying to respond to new California laws that are...

Letter to Editor: Your “Standing Firm With Santa Monica” Initiative

April 25, 2022

April 25, 2022

The following is an open letter to Councilmember Sue Himmelrich from Santa Monica resident Arthur Jeon regarding a proposed transfer...

SMa.r.t. Column: Planning The Real Future

April 24, 2022

April 24, 2022

In the 1970s, renowned USC architecture professor Ralph Knowles developed a method for planning and designing cities that would dramatically...

SMa.r.t. Column: New City Financial Plan: The Resident Homeowner Bank

April 15, 2022

April 15, 2022

Part II: Who pays the proposed transfer tax and where does the money go? Last week, we introduced the proposed...

Column: NIMBYs Getting a Bad Rap

April 8, 2022

April 8, 2022

By Tom Elias Rarely has a major group of Californians suffered a less deserved rash of insults and attacks than...

SMa.r.t. Column: New City Financial Plan – The Resident Homeowner Bank

April 8, 2022

April 8, 2022

Part 1 of 2 In this two-part article, we will discuss both the proposed transfer tax ballot initiative and the...

Column: Tackling Childcare Costs

April 7, 2022

April 7, 2022

Finding affordable, quality childcare is essential for many working parents. The current shortage of care options is helping drive up...

SMa.r.t. Column: Tunneling for Mobility

April 1, 2022

April 1, 2022

Editor’s note: this is an April Fools Day column and is intended to be satire.  Starting this year permits from...

SMa.r.t. Column: The Value of Our Boulevards

March 28, 2022

March 28, 2022

Following is a composite of past articles dealing with the accelerated demise of our beachfront environment together with the increasing...