June 2, 2023 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

I’m Sorry, Did You Say… “Invasive?”:

I know who you talked to on your cell phone last week. I know which websites you’ve visited on your computer. I know that you purchased health care items at your drug store two days ago indicating that someone in your household is incontinent. I know that you buy vegetables, and with a fifth of that budget vodka every time you’re at the grocery store. I read all about your family vacation and the flu you contracted because I visited your social site. I have video of you entering and leaving a dozen buildings over a two-day period. I am… just about anybody. Now, what was that new problem you were having with the body searches at the airport?

Quickly, which would you prefer: That a trained professional at the airport brushes his hand alongside your ‘junk’ as one means of saving human lives,or that while you are standing at the airport security post, a screen projects the following list of websites that you visited in the 48 hours prior to your flight: “Gym Coaches in Bondage,” “Granny Likes ‘Em Big and Dumb,” “Pulled Over by the Leather Police,” and of course Facebook.

Let’s look at what might be a primary corollary in all of this, which is some question of freedom. I‘ve been cautious with the word “freedom” since it became synonymous with invading countries and killing civilians to seize control of their oil. But let’s use an old school definition of freedom, especially Webster’s number four definition: “Ease or facility of movement or action.” Do the new TSA search procedures violate freedom? And following that, do they violate it in some way that exceeds the freedom we are all willingly sacrificing each day by means of yielding our privacy to the digital info-sphere?

There’s a reasonable presumption that a citizen should not have to submit to having their body touched by an agent of any authority unless that touching can be proved to be absolutely necessary. What proves that necessity? It could certainly be the precedent of someone having attempted to blow up an airliner with materials concealed in their underpants. Does a woman’s brassiere legitimately qualify as a hiding place? Hundreds of old movies demonstrate that diamonds, money, and treasure maps can be found there.

A search, in effect, evidences some level of suspicion. If one of your kid’s was pulled over on a Saturday night for weaving across a lane of traffic, police might insist on a breathalyzer or blood sample for alcohol toxicity. If that action saved your child’s life and the lives of others, you’d be grateful for the level of suspicion involved. At the moment of having your ‘junk’ brushed up against at the airport you might experience a violation of your freedom, specifically the freedom of your junk to travel in your pants without incident. When explosives were later found on the guy six people behind you who was ticketed for your flight, you’d feel less violated.

This column has defended the TSA previously, shortly after 9/11 travelers took out their frustration with airport procedures by openly denigrating the personnel involved. Since then the TSA has made strides in professionalizing on its side of things, yet here we are on our side still grousing about efficiently processed searches at airports that are meant to save our whining selves. Why not direct that energy toward the airlines who are currently gouging you for your luggage, your refreshments, your pillow and blanket, and possibly soon your in-flight bathroom use.

We might feel that contact during airport searches violates our freedom by way of denying privacy. We might, except that most of us are panting and breathless from freely surrendering our privacy on a daily basis. Every retail chain store offers a discount card that allows the big machine out there to track your purchases and sell you more goods based on information you seem happy to yield to them. Since cell phones produce call records as a part of their function, ditto anyone wanting to find out who you are talking to. A web history is exactly that, although “history” in the Abe Lincoln sense rarely utilized the words “hot” and “Mommy” with regularity. Reality TV shows are populated with previously normal citizens who have decided that turning their private lives into video mulch is a small price to pay for fame and adoration. These are people that crave the invasive stalking that people like Charlie Sheen would love to shed. Their husbands, their children, their friends… no privacy is too great to sacrifice for “The Real Wives” of Anytown, USA.

As individuals, our reactions to airport security procedures will continue to be our own. But as a society let’s not pretend that we’re sick to death of things that are “invasive,” then rush to a social site to publish how our ‘junk’ was violated. Had last year’s Christmas Day bomber succeeded in his mission, would we be having this bubble of protest regarding searches? The fear of loss of freedom has often been expressed as soldiers kicking down our doors and marching into our homes to see what we’re up to. Now they don’t have to ever leave the barracks; they can just go online and find out exactly what we’re up to. They’ll even have a record of that blog where we wrote our passionate and angry essay on being violated at the airport. Because they can put their hands on that ‘junk’ any time they want.

in Opinion
Related Posts

SMa.r.t. Column: Improving Santa Monica’s Future: A Resident-Oriented Master Plan

May 28, 2023

May 28, 2023

Improving Santa Monica’s Future: A Resident-Oriented Master Plan Santa Monica, like many cities, requires a well-defined master plan to guide...

Pretext Stops Are a Vital Crime Prevention Tool

May 22, 2023

May 22, 2023

By Cody Green, Santa Monica Police Officers Association (SMPOA) Chairman and Lieutenant, SMPD  Recently the Santa Monica Public Safety Oversight...

Is City Government Listening to You?

May 21, 2023

May 21, 2023

Sometimes, it might feel like City Council members or local government staff aren’t paying attention to the concerns of residents....

New Program Can Help Protect Southern California Homes in the Event of an Earthquake

May 13, 2023

May 13, 2023

Residents Have Until May 31 To Apply For Seismic Retrofit Grants By Janiele Maffei, Chief Mitigation Officer for the California...

SMO (So Many Options) Part 1

April 20, 2023

April 20, 2023

SMart (Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow)  The volume of discussion around the options for Santa Monica Airport (SMO)...

SMa.r.t. Column: Reusing Buildings for the Benefit of All

April 2, 2023

April 2, 2023

[Almost two years ago our colleague Michael Jolly prepared this analysis of the benefits and risks of repurposing existing buildings,...

SMa.r.t. Column: I Told You So

March 28, 2023

March 28, 2023

On January17, 2015  SMa.r.t. posted a prophetic article in the Daily Press written by Ron Goldman FAIA advocating maintaining a...

Column: SB 9 Ended R-1 Zoning, but It’s Not Meeting Goals

March 11, 2023

March 11, 2023

By Tom Elias More than a year after it took effect, the landmark housing density law known as SB 9...

SMa.r.t. Column: The Urgency to Retrofit Earthquake-Deficient Buildings

March 6, 2023

March 6, 2023

Recent early-morning tremors off the Malibu coast, and the huge and terrible earthquake in Turkey and Syria have made us...

SMa.r.t. Column: ​​Reinforcing the Future – A Revisit

February 27, 2023

February 27, 2023

Six years go we discussed, in these pages, the city’s then-renewed earthquake-retrofit rules. At the time we argued that the...

Column: The Inevitable Conversions Begin Multiplying

February 25, 2023

February 25, 2023

By Tom Elias It’s a phenomenon from New York to Dallas to Fresno and Los Angeles, one that seemed inevitable...

Column: The Fantasy World of California Housing Policy

February 20, 2023

February 20, 2023

By Tom Elias If you’re looking for sure things among bills under consideration in the state Legislature, think of one...

SMa.r.t. Column: Santa Monica City Council – Planners, Politicians, or Developers?

February 19, 2023

February 19, 2023

Santa Monica – a progressive city 20 years ago, a chaotic city today! A city that is struggling for its...

SMa.r.t. Column: What’s Wrong With This Picture?

February 16, 2023

February 16, 2023

The picture shown above is the future of Santa Monica. Large tall buildings along the Boulevards and Avenues plus Downtown...

SMa.r.t. Column: To a Better Housing Element

February 3, 2023

February 3, 2023

Your City is busy rewriting much of its zoning code to implement our new Housing Element as demanded by the...