March 24, 2023 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Article Prompts Santa Monica City Council to End Liaison Program:

All it took was one magazine article for the Santa Monica City Council to reconsider how its individual members interact with the City’s other various boards and commissions.

Council members approved ending its liaison program at its annual retreat on Feb. 13, meaning the City’s elected officials will no longer serve as a point-of-contact between the council and the smorgasbord of Boards and Commissions active in Santa Monica.

Staff was also directed “to return with guidelines and norms for communication between Council members and Boards and Commissions.”

The Council’s decision, which aimed to eliminate potential lawsuits against its members, was based upon an ethics column authored by Sacramento-based attorney Michael Dean in “Western City,” the monthly magazine of The League of California Cities. (Click HERE to read that article)

“As innocent as a council member’s motives may be, when he or she personally attends a planning commission meeting or another subordinate committee meeting, he or she may be crossing an ethical boundary,” Dean stated in his column.

Dean’s column, which was published in the December 2010 issue of “Western City,” prompted City Attorney Marsha Jones Moutrie to submit a staff report for council discussion about whether the council’s current practice of serving as liaisons on boards and commissions violated any laws or ethical norms.

“We concur with the writer’s conclusions that there are, from legal and ethical perspectives, certain problems with our current system, and we agree about the concerns that he raised,” Jones stated at the retreat, adding, however, the City has never received a complaint of any form against a council member for his or her actions while serving as a liaison to a board or commission. “An issue of process was raised. We felt we couldn’t dismiss the concerns that were raised.”

Accordingly, the council weighed between altering its current practice of specific members serving as a board’s or commission’s first-point-of-contact or whether the directive should be eliminated altogether. After an extensive discussion at last week’s retreat, the Council decided, in a 5-2 vote, to eliminate its liaison program.

At heart of the issue is whether a council member’s attendance at a board or commission meeting may interfere “with the role of the commission as an independent advisory body,” run the risk of violating due process or revealing a bias, or allow for a situation where an elected official would not act “in accordance with the views of the city council as a whole.”

Under Dean’s rationale, a key conflict of interest or bias could potentially arise in certain critical boards and commissions where legal determinations are made that affect property modifications. Boards and commissions possessing such quasi-judicial functions include the Planning Commission, Landmarks Commission, Personnel Board, and Architectural Review Board.

“Because the right to due process is attached to many of these types of commission decisions, the participants in such proceedings have the right to an unbiased decision-maker at the city council level,” Dean stated in his column. “A council member who comments at the commission meeting and indicates a firm position on a particular matter may be subjected to a challenge for bias when the same issue reaches the city council.”

Specifically, Dean indicated there could be serious legal or ethical issues attached to a council member if he or she sat on the dais or otherwise actively participated in the discussion of any given board or commission; generally, boards and commissions are independent advisory committees.

“I truly believe our boards and commissions are hugely important,” said Council member Kevin McKeown, who believed that the presence on the dais of council liaisons meant commissioners knew their work was heard and appreciated. “These are volunteers giving their time to help us understand better the issues that come before the Council. Understanding those issues, to my mind, is part of my job as a city council member.”

Adding a practical perspective was Council member Bobby Shriver, who observed current and future council members may not have the time to attend board or commission meetings.

“While the commissions are human institutions, so is the council, and the council has a lot of meetings. Some people on the council are able to go to a lot of other meetings, others, because of their work or travel schedule, are not,” Shriver said. “To create a uniform expectation for all members of the council I think is a mistake and unnecessary.”

Beyond scheduling issues, the volume of boards and commissions operating within Santa Monica itself is so high even the most proactive of council members may find it difficult to attend meetings on a regular basis, it was discussed.

With the council’s decision last week, whether a council member has time or not to attend board or commission meetings will not be an issue.

The Council’s vote was 5-2 in favor of eliminating its liaison program; McKeown and Mayor Pro Tem Gleam Davis were the two dissenting votes.

McKeown went on the record characterizing his “No” vote as an indication the system in place prior to the council decision was not broken.

“My ‘No’ vote reflects a belief that the existing practice of liaisons to boards and commissions has historically provided a significant community benefit by furthering communication and understanding of local government,” he stated.”

Council members are not required by law to serve as a liaison on any given board or commission, nor has any precedent been set by “informal council action” or “uniform custom.” According to Jones’ staff report, “the only reference to council liaisons in local law appears in Charter Section 1007, and it is very general.”

That section cites: “[t]he City Council may select one of its members to provide active liaison with the [Planning] Commission, but the council member chosen shall neither have a vote in the commission nor be eligible to be its chairperson.”

in News
Related Posts

Santa Monica Pet Hotel Hosts Puppy-Friendly St. Patty’s Day Party

March 24, 2023

March 24, 2023

A new pet hotel in Santa Monica recently hosted a St. Patrick’s Day party for local dogs. Check out all...

Santa Monica Mountains Largest Ever Restoration Project Nears Completion After 7,000 Hours of Volunteer Work

March 24, 2023

March 24, 2023

Final planting event will be held Saturday, March 25 at 9 a.m. for the park’s largest ever restoration project After...

California Appeals Court Rules Uber and Lyft Can Classify Drivers as Independent Contractors

March 24, 2023

March 24, 2023

Proposition 22 exempted ride-share companies from certain labor laws, court rules in favor of the companies By Sam Catanzaro ​​A...

Film Review – Operation Fortune: Ruse de Guerre

March 24, 2023

March 24, 2023

FILM REVIEWOPERATION FORTUNE: Ruse de GuerreRated R114 MinutesReleased March 3rd Now that the season of weighty Oscar contender films is...

Santa Monica Uses Innovative Water Recycling Facility to Capture and Store Rainwater

March 23, 2023

March 23, 2023

City’s Sustainable Water Infrastructure Project reducing reliance on imported water and sets a model for future projects Santa Monica has...

Shuttered Santa Monica Loews Hotel to Rebrand and Reopen as a Regent Hotel

March 23, 2023

March 23, 2023

Hotel’s new operator announces plans for $4 million renovation, including rebranding and upgrading accessibility for guests with disabilities By Dolores...

Three Arrested for Identity Theft, Possession of Stolen Property, and Grand Theft in Santa Monica

March 23, 2023

March 23, 2023

Suspects found with over 20 stolen cellphones, credit cards, and identification Three individuals were arrested in Santa Monica for identity...

Proposal for Improved Communication With Street Vendors Sparks Contentious Debate in City Council Meeting

March 23, 2023

March 23, 2023

Councilmembers divided over proposal calling for City Manager to engage in meaningful consultation with authorized vendors regarding sidewalk vending policies...

Former Bank Building in Santa Monica Becomes a Food Destination with Addition of Katsu Bar

March 23, 2023

March 23, 2023

Katsu Bar joins Paderia and Oakberry in the transformation of the 3032 Wilshire building By Dolores Quintana Katsu Bar has...

Survey: Should Officials Remove Barriers to Outdoor Dining?

March 23, 2023

March 23, 2023

The COVID-19 pandemic drastically changed the way we live our lives, and one of the most significant impacts has been...

Gasolina Cafe Owner, Sandra Cordero, to Open New Tapas Bar in Santa Monica

March 23, 2023

March 23, 2023

Tapas bar expected to open late spring in former Heroic Italian space at 516 Santa Monica Boulevard  Sandra Cordero, the...

California’s AB 1217 Could Supersede Costly Outdoor Dining Permits Proposed by Municipalities

March 22, 2023

March 22, 2023

Legislation would preempt local ordinances and preserve regulatory flexibility for struggling neighborhood restaurants By Sam Catanzaro A new bill proposed...

Emerging Artist Jesse Liu Opens First-Ever Exhibition in Venice Gallery

March 22, 2023

March 22, 2023

“Spring Fever” currently on display at Yiwei Gallery By Keemia Zhang Local artist Jesse Liu has opened her first solo...

Santa Monica Place Invites LGBTQIA+ Artisans to Apply for Made With PRIDE Marketplace

March 21, 2023

March 21, 2023

Partnering with Streetlet, the marketplace will take place each weekend in June and showcase local goods made in Southern California....

Santa Monica Councilmember Phil Brock Appointed to National League of Cities Council on Youth, Education, and Families

March 21, 2023

March 21, 2023

Brock to collaborate with group of local leaders to develop and guide programs for communities across the country Santa Monica...