October 7, 2024 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

SM Parking Tickets: Could We Please Have an Argument?:

There’s a difference between just being contentious and having an argument. True, we’ve lost a lot of ground with the concept of arguments thanks to such things as talk radio, 24-hour “news” channels, and TV sensation pimps like Maury Povich. But taken one way, America itself was an argument that was won by the founding fathers. “Excuse me, England, but we’d like our liberty. And here’s our argument for that…”

Webster acknowledges that the definition of an argument starts out with “verbal opposition or contention,” or what some might call “parenting.” But deeper in we get “debate or dispute” followed by “a process of reasoning,” and then my favorite, “a statement for or against a point.”

Mirror contributor Hannah Heineman has reported that there’s a definite level of contention about the way citizens are dealt with by the city of Santa Monica regarding appeals for parking citations [See “City Accused of Not Explaining Denied Parking Appeals” on page A1]. It appears that during the appeals process, the city can review an appealed citation and then send a letter to the citizen involved that has this language in it: “The review has confirmed that the citation was properly issued and is valid. The reason given does not invalidate the citation.” There’s no reason given (by or from the City) for why the (appealed) citation was not dismissed. Put another way, the City is refusing to give up enough information for the appellant to continue their argument.

Heineman’s reporting pressed the city for comment. As she wrote: “Don Patterson, the City’s business and revenues operations manager, issued a statement on May 4. Patterson said that the City attorney’s office looked over the City’s citation administrative review process and concluded the following: “Our current administrative processes and notices meet the minimum requirements of applicable state law. The City continuously reviews all of our processes in an ongoing effort to improve customer service and we have been in the process of reviewing and updating various parking related notices over the past several months.”

So we see some daylight in a possible review of the process. But there may be an observation to be made which is that there can sometimes be a dimension to government process whereby citizens are, shall we say, nudged to give up the fight. Borrowing from the Museum of Things Grandad Used to Say, you can’t fight city hall. Except that you can, and there are times when citizens do and they’re right. I’m reminded of the dust-up a few years back about high hedges and fines for high hedges. At one point, letters from the City informed Santa Monica residents of ridiculously high potential fines for not cutting their hedges lower. Cooler heads and accommodation prevailed.

It’s fair and reasonable to put some of this off on human nature. We will often come to realize what’s involved in a process, and give up by making the decision that the pursuit of an issue or point or a citation appeal is bigger than the thing itself. Take the scenario of realizing a product you’ve purchased has failed while still under warranty. Suddenly a seemingly simple conversation on the phone about a blown-out hair dryer becomes the Scopes trial from “Inherit the Wind” with you arguing that, if this were a moral universe, somebody would simply put a new hair dryer in the mail and stop beating you up about a store receipt. And let’s not even start on talking to the cable people …

But the day-to-day interactions of government with its citizens should never incorporate some expectation of citizen fatigue as means of reducing additional steps in full and fair process. Could not providing the complete information a citizen needs to continue their appeal reflect a small level of hope that, in frustration, the appellant will throw in their cards? Or more specifically, throw a check into an envelope and quit fighting? I hope not.

About a year ago I was cited by LAPD for crossing a double yellow line. I was guilty, but I considered arguing to a judge that there are so many 24/7 violations of that nature that picking me out for a fine was ludicrous and thus somehow unfair. (I concede the weakness of that argument.) I reflected on the time all that would take, and decided to pay my fine. I went to the building where you pay fines, and my ticket was not in the system yet. I was advised not to mail the payment until their processing had caught up. I was concerned about not having a receipt, so I would have to come back again in two weeks to pay. For a good citizen, it seemed like a lot of bother. And the parking at the building involved was five bucks a pop. Just sayin’…

If I was administrating parking ticket appeals, I wonder exactly how liberal I would be in giving everybody their day and time to argue it out. I can see myself at some point suggesting “I’ll flip you for it.” The frustration template of “Well, you can keep pressing on this but it’s hard…” appears everywhere in modern life but we shouldn’t always throw up our hands and quit, especially in instances where it’s our government. Ours. And that’s not an argument.

in Opinion
Related Posts

SM.a.r.t Column: Fact-Checking Election-Season Windbaggery

October 6, 2024

October 6, 2024

Claim: The state is requiring Santa Monica to build 9,000 apartments.Answer: Partially true, partially false. Santa Monica has a pretty...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Public Safety and Traffic Enforcement Can Help Save Lives and Revitalize Santa Monica’s Economy

September 29, 2024

September 29, 2024

We wholeheartedly endorse the candidates below for Santa Monica City Council. Their leading campaign platform is for increased safety in...

SM.a.r.t Column: Crime in Santa Monica: A Growing Concern and the Need for Prioritizing Public Safety

September 22, 2024

September 22, 2024

By Michael Jolly Over the past six months, Santa Monica has experienced a concerning rise in crime, sparking heated discussions...

SM.a.r.t Column: Ten New Commandments

September 15, 2024

September 15, 2024

Starting last week,  the elementary school students of Louisiana will all face mandatory postings of the biblical Ten Commandments in...

SM.a.r.t Column: Santa Monica’s Next City Council

September 8, 2024

September 8, 2024

In the next general election, this November 5th, Santa Monica residents will be asked to vote their choices among an...

SM.a.r.t Column: Part II: The Affordability Crisis: Unmasking California’s RHNA Process and Its Role in Gentrification

September 2, 2024

September 2, 2024

Affordability: An Income and Available Asset Gap Issue, Not a Supply Issue (Last week’s article revealed how state mandates became...

SM.a.r.t Column: Part 1: The Affordability Crisis: Unmasking California’s RHNA Process and Its Role in Gentrification

August 26, 2024

August 26, 2024

In the world of economic policy, good intentions often pave the way to unintended consequences. Nowhere is this more evident...

SM.a.r.t Column: They Want to Build a Wall

August 18, 2024

August 18, 2024

Every once in a while, a topic arises that we had previously written about but doesn’t seem to go away....

SM.a.r.t Column: Sharks vs. Batteries – Part 5 of 5

August 11, 2024

August 11, 2024

This is the last SMart article in an expanding  5 part series about our City’s power, water, and food prospects....

SM.a.r.t Column: Your Home’s First Battery Is in Your Car

August 4, 2024

August 4, 2024

This is the fourth in a series of SM.a.r.t articles about food, water, and energy issues in Santa Monica. You...

SM.a.r.t Column: Food Water and Energy Part 3 of 4

July 28, 2024

July 28, 2024

Our previous two S.M.a,r,t, articles talked about the seismic risks to the City from getting its three survival essentials: food,...

Food, Water, and Energy Part 2 of 4

July 21, 2024

July 21, 2024

Last week’s S.M.a,r,t, article (https://smmirror.com/2024/07/sm-a-r-t-column-food-water-and-energy-part-1-of-3/) talked about the seismic risks to the City from getting its three survival essentials, food,...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Food Water and Energy Part 1 of 3

July 14, 2024

July 14, 2024

Civilization, as we know it, requires many things, but the most critical and fundamental is an uninterrupted supply of three...

Letter to the Editor: Criticizing Israeli Policy Is Not Antisemitic

July 10, 2024

July 10, 2024

In the past several months, we’ve seen increasing protests against Israel’s actions in Gaza. We have also seen these protests...

SMA.R.T. WISHES ALL A VERY HAPPY 4TH OF JULY WEEK

July 7, 2024

July 7, 2024

We trust you are enjoying this holiday in celebration of Independence. Independence to be embraced, personally and civically, thru active...