May 26, 2022 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Letter to the Editor: Palisades Park:

Dear Editor,

Change doesn’t always come easily to a landmark: witness the lively and sometimes contentious discussion about the current design for Town Square, presented to the City Council last week, reported (and commented upon) in these pages [Santa Monica Mirror June 17-23, 2011 edition, “$46.1 Mil Park Moves Forward” on page A1].

However, I’d like to take this opportunity to clarify some of the underlying issues to this conversation – in the hope of suggesting that a design solution is close at hand.

First of all, the Civic Center Specific Plan is quite clear about the purpose of Town Square, calling out for an open, civic space, a “democratic space” in the tradition of a forum. Palisades Garden Walk, by contrast, is identified as a park, distinct in character and purpose. 

And unlike the six-acre site of Palisades Garden Walk – physically a blank slate (with the exception of several stands of mature trees) – the one-acre City Hall site is a cultural landscape richly layered in history and meaning. Its many designed features, from the configuration of the open space, the pattern of walkways, the central garden and historic planting beds — all combine to create a classical, symmetrical setting for Santa Monica’s most important civic building. An understanding of these features, and of the essential nature of this civic space, are therefore critical prerequisites for the next iteration Town Square’s design.

Some in our community might regard these conditions as constraints. But I would like to offer another perspective: where constraints offer opportunities for creative, progressive solutions. All great design involves a response to existing conditions — and I would contend that the ball is now in the court of the design team: to offer a creative, sustainable and informed design that respects the historic landscape, fulfills the civic purpose of the space, and inspires our community. I am confident that James Corner Field Operations can deliver. The new Town Square can at once be compatible with our landmark City Hall, meet community needs and aspirations, and integrate appropriate gestures to its new neighbor across Main Street.

-Margaret Bach (Landmarks Commissioner), Santa Monica

in Opinion
Related Posts

​​Doubt Removed: Oil Refiners Gouging Us

May 23, 2022

May 23, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist There was some room for doubt back in February, when gasoline prices rose precipitously: Until the...

Is the Big Housing Crunch Mostly Fiction?

May 20, 2022

May 20, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist In some parts of California, there is definitely a housing crunch: small supplies of homes for...

Is Gelson’s Our Future? Bigger Is Not Better & Not Necessary! – Part 2

May 20, 2022

May 20, 2022

The dream of our beachfront city is about to become a nightmare! Just imagine a tsunami of these projects washing...

Column From Santa Monica Mayor Himmelrich: We Walk the Talk

May 12, 2022

May 12, 2022

By Sue Himmelrich, Santa Moncia Mayor  I like the SMa.r.t. architects. I often agree with them. But in allowing Mark...

Is Gelson’s Our Future? Bigger Is Not Better!

May 12, 2022

May 12, 2022

It’s appalling to see what’s happening in our city – projects recently built or about to be approved – in...

Renting Your Second Home

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

If you are among the many Americans who own a second home that you occasionally use as a vacation getaway,...

Column: Cities Fight to Maintain Distinctive Characters

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist Anyone who knows California well will realize that Palo Alto does not look much like nearby...

SMa.r.t. Column: Gelson’s, Boxed-In

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

This week we are re-visiting an article from 2018 regarding the Miramar project, by simply replacing the word “Miramar” with...

Column: Are You Talking Yourself Out of Saving for Retirement? Here’s How to Break the Habit

May 5, 2022

May 5, 2022

Saving for retirement can be an abstract concept. It’s something we all know we should do, but the farther away...

SMa.r.t. Column: Failure to Plan…

April 30, 2022

April 30, 2022

Over the last approximately two years your City has been busy trying to respond to new California laws that are...

Letter to Editor: Your “Standing Firm With Santa Monica” Initiative

April 25, 2022

April 25, 2022

The following is an open letter to Councilmember Sue Himmelrich from Santa Monica resident Arthur Jeon regarding a proposed transfer...

SMa.r.t. Column: Planning The Real Future

April 24, 2022

April 24, 2022

In the 1970s, renowned USC architecture professor Ralph Knowles developed a method for planning and designing cities that would dramatically...

SMa.r.t. Column: New City Financial Plan: The Resident Homeowner Bank

April 15, 2022

April 15, 2022

Part II: Who pays the proposed transfer tax and where does the money go? Last week, we introduced the proposed...

Column: NIMBYs Getting a Bad Rap

April 8, 2022

April 8, 2022

By Tom Elias Rarely has a major group of Californians suffered a less deserved rash of insults and attacks than...

SMa.r.t. Column: New City Financial Plan – The Resident Homeowner Bank

April 8, 2022

April 8, 2022

Part 1 of 2 In this two-part article, we will discuss both the proposed transfer tax ballot initiative and the...