March 30, 2023 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Santa Monica to Explain Denied Parking Appeals:

The City of Santa Monica has announced plans to shift policy and provide appellants contesting parking tickets with written explanations for denied appeals. This comes on the heels of reports that no explanations were given from the City despite a 2008 state law requiring an explanation for denied parking appeals.

The law was supposed to have taken effect in January 2009, however the City continued to not include an explanation in their notification letters. This prompted a resident, Stan Epstein, to file a complaint, which was reported on in a previous Mirror story.

On May 27, the City’s finance department issued a release indicating that notifications sent to individuals appealing citations will now receive additional details in their decision letter.

The release states that even though the letters the City had been using “provide the minimum information required by law, the City believes that providing additional details with these letters would improve customer service.”

The current process includes an initial review of the correspondence from the person who received the ticket by the City’s parking violations office. This correspondence includes the reasons why the individual believes they were inappropriately ticketed, and it must be submitted within 21 days after the ticket was issued. However, the parking fine does not have to be submitted.

The person then receives a letter, which includes a decision on the initial review. If the individual’s reasons are found to be valid the letter states the ticket has been dismissed. If the reasons are found to be invalid, the law requires that an explanation be given as to why the ticket is not being dismissed. The City had been stating, “The review has confirmed that the citation was properly issued and is valid. The reason given does not invalidate the citation.”

The ticket holder then has the option to appeal a second time, paying the citation fine and requesting an administrative hearing within 21 days of the date the initial review letter was issued. The individual then receives a letter stating whether the ticket was dismissed. Once again, if the ticket is not dismissed, an explanation must be given as to the reasons it was not dismissed (which the City also was not doing.) If the ticket is not dismissed, the ticket holder can appeal this decision in superior court by paying a $25 fee.

Don Patterson, the City’s finance manager, spoke to the Mirror about the changes. He explained the police department completes the initial review and if they decide not to dismiss an appealed citation they will now include additional information about their denial. However, this information will not be as extensive as the information a person would receive if they appeal a second time and their citation is still not dismissed. This is because an administrative hearing officer hears the second appeal. According to Patterson, this hearing officer writes out their thought process that brings them to their decision. He/she then enters information on this process into the City’s computer system. Now notification letters of appeal denials will contain information from the hearing officer’s computer system entry.

The release also stated that anyone who has appealed a parking citation can request additional details on why their citation was not dismissed by e-mailing parking.office@smgov.net. They will receive a response within 10 business days. Patterson emphasized this offer is “open to anyone who wants additional information beyond what was originally provided to them.” However, “the offer to provide more information will have no impact on the process” if the timelines for the appeals which were stated earlier in this article have expired. These changes also do not impact the process of appealing a citation to the superior court.

Patterson also mentioned that the City has been working on a number of customer service improvements in terms of parking and that the complaint on appeal notification letters and the Mirror’s story on the issue moved up the City’s review of the letters. The changes are “consistent with what we’ve been doing – trying to make things more customer friendly, transparent and predictable.”

in News
Related Posts

Eight Santa Monica Police Activities League Youth Complete The Los Angeles Marathon

March 29, 2023

March 29, 2023

Setting a new PAL record for the Los Angeles Marathon, Jade Furukawa came in at 4 hours and 50 minutes...

Bystander Injured After Man Jumps from Third Floor of Santa Monica Place in Potential Suicide Attempt

March 29, 2023

March 29, 2023

Monday afternoon incident results in injuries to a woman in her 70s and a man in his 50s. By Sam...

Clippers Center Ivica Zubac Joins Students for Medical Simulation Training

March 29, 2023

March 29, 2023

Students gain hands-on experience with virtual reality tools, CPR training, and surgical equipment at Cedars-Sinai’s Women’s Guild Simulation Center For...

Santa Monica Hosts Active Aging Group Bike Ride for Older Adults

March 28, 2023

March 28, 2023

Event set for Thursday, March 30, to practice safe biking skills and the rules of the road Older adults in...

City Council Approves Land Use Amendments to Implement Housing Element

March 28, 2023

March 28, 2023

Amendments to zoning codes to support affordable housing production and streamline approval process The Santa Monica City Council has taken...

Changes Coming to Chautauqua and PCH to Address Traffic Congestion

March 28, 2023

March 28, 2023

Two changes coming to intersection of Chautauqua and PCH in late April Residents of Pacific Palisades can expect changes to...

“Hunger Cliff” Looms as CalFresh Benefits Come to an End in Southern California

March 27, 2023

March 27, 2023

Local food banks urge community support as Southern Californians face heightened food insecurity Local food banks in Southern California are...

Historic Santa Monica House with Rock ‘n’ Roll Past Hits the Market for $22.5M

March 27, 2023

March 27, 2023

The Witbeck House, a charming and beautifully preserved 1917 property with a recording studio used by musician Jackson Browne, is...

Community Corporation of Santa Monica Unveils New Affordable Housing Project in Pico Neighborhood

March 26, 2023

March 26, 2023

Brunson Terrace apartments will offer affordable housing and retail space for local businesses Community Corporation of Santa Monica has unveiled...

Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Rejects Extension of Tenant Protections

March 26, 2023

March 26, 2023

County Board of Supervisors votes down measure affecting landlords in unincorporated areas. The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors voted...

Santa Monica Pet Hotel Hosts Puppy-Friendly St. Patty’s Day Party

March 24, 2023

March 24, 2023

A new pet hotel in Santa Monica recently hosted a St. Patrick’s Day party for local dogs. Check out all...

Santa Monica Mountains Largest Ever Restoration Project Nears Completion After 7,000 Hours of Volunteer Work

March 24, 2023

March 24, 2023

Final planting event will be held Saturday, March 25 at 9 a.m. for the park’s largest ever restoration project After...

California Appeals Court Rules Uber and Lyft Can Classify Drivers as Independent Contractors

March 24, 2023

March 24, 2023

Proposition 22 exempted ride-share companies from certain labor laws, court rules in favor of the companies By Sam Catanzaro ​​A...

Film Review – Operation Fortune: Ruse de Guerre

March 24, 2023

March 24, 2023

FILM REVIEWOPERATION FORTUNE: Ruse de GuerreRated R114 MinutesReleased March 3rd Now that the season of weighty Oscar contender films is...

Santa Monica Uses Innovative Water Recycling Facility to Capture and Store Rainwater

March 23, 2023

March 23, 2023

City’s Sustainable Water Infrastructure Project reducing reliance on imported water and sets a model for future projects Santa Monica has...