July 2, 2025 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Santa Monica to Explain Denied Parking Appeals:

The City of Santa Monica has announced plans to shift policy and provide appellants contesting parking tickets with written explanations for denied appeals. This comes on the heels of reports that no explanations were given from the City despite a 2008 state law requiring an explanation for denied parking appeals.

The law was supposed to have taken effect in January 2009, however the City continued to not include an explanation in their notification letters. This prompted a resident, Stan Epstein, to file a complaint, which was reported on in a previous Mirror story.

On May 27, the City’s finance department issued a release indicating that notifications sent to individuals appealing citations will now receive additional details in their decision letter.

The release states that even though the letters the City had been using “provide the minimum information required by law, the City believes that providing additional details with these letters would improve customer service.”

The current process includes an initial review of the correspondence from the person who received the ticket by the City’s parking violations office. This correspondence includes the reasons why the individual believes they were inappropriately ticketed, and it must be submitted within 21 days after the ticket was issued. However, the parking fine does not have to be submitted.

The person then receives a letter, which includes a decision on the initial review. If the individual’s reasons are found to be valid the letter states the ticket has been dismissed. If the reasons are found to be invalid, the law requires that an explanation be given as to why the ticket is not being dismissed. The City had been stating, “The review has confirmed that the citation was properly issued and is valid. The reason given does not invalidate the citation.”

The ticket holder then has the option to appeal a second time, paying the citation fine and requesting an administrative hearing within 21 days of the date the initial review letter was issued. The individual then receives a letter stating whether the ticket was dismissed. Once again, if the ticket is not dismissed, an explanation must be given as to the reasons it was not dismissed (which the City also was not doing.) If the ticket is not dismissed, the ticket holder can appeal this decision in superior court by paying a $25 fee.

Don Patterson, the City’s finance manager, spoke to the Mirror about the changes. He explained the police department completes the initial review and if they decide not to dismiss an appealed citation they will now include additional information about their denial. However, this information will not be as extensive as the information a person would receive if they appeal a second time and their citation is still not dismissed. This is because an administrative hearing officer hears the second appeal. According to Patterson, this hearing officer writes out their thought process that brings them to their decision. He/she then enters information on this process into the City’s computer system. Now notification letters of appeal denials will contain information from the hearing officer’s computer system entry.

The release also stated that anyone who has appealed a parking citation can request additional details on why their citation was not dismissed by e-mailing parking.office@smgov.net. They will receive a response within 10 business days. Patterson emphasized this offer is “open to anyone who wants additional information beyond what was originally provided to them.” However, “the offer to provide more information will have no impact on the process” if the timelines for the appeals which were stated earlier in this article have expired. These changes also do not impact the process of appealing a citation to the superior court.

Patterson also mentioned that the City has been working on a number of customer service improvements in terms of parking and that the complaint on appeal notification letters and the Mirror’s story on the issue moved up the City’s review of the letters. The changes are “consistent with what we’ve been doing – trying to make things more customer friendly, transparent and predictable.”

in News
<>Related Posts

(Video) ‘World’s Strongest Man’ Champion Pulls Big Blue Bus for 30 feet

July 1, 2025

July 1, 2025

World-class strongman Martins Licis pulled a 34,680‑pound, 35-feet long, battery electric bus through the Pier to set off Pier 360...

California Highway Patrol Deploys for Independence Day Enforcement Surge

July 1, 2025

July 1, 2025

All Available Officers to Hit California Highways for Holiday Weekend As Californians gear up for Fourth of July festivities, the...

Court Postpones Arraignment for Driver in Malibu Crash That Killed Four Students

July 1, 2025

July 1, 2025

Fraser Michael Bohm Faces Murder Charges in Fatal PCH Wreck  The arraignment for Fraser Michael Bohm, the 23-year-old man accused...

More Commercial Uses Could Be Coming to RAND Building

July 1, 2025

July 1, 2025

Amendment Unlocks New Opportunities, Secures $5.5 Million in Community Benefits The Santa Monica Planning Commission unanimously approved an amendment to...

People are Using Palisades for “Disaster Tours.” Local Officials Are Trying to Stop Them

July 1, 2025

July 1, 2025

A new motion introduced to City Council requests a coordinated strategy from LADOT, the Los Angeles Police Department, and the...

Santa Monica Favorite Esters Rebrands as Esters Wine Shop & Oyster Bar

June 30, 2025

June 30, 2025

New Concept Launches With French-Spanish Flair and Free Bubbles Esters Wine Shop, the fave Parisian-style wine bar in downtown Santa...

Letter to the Editor: Santa Monica’s Great Park: It’s Time to Deliver on 100 Years of Promise

June 30, 2025

June 30, 2025

Santa Monica stands at the edge of history. For nearly a century, residents have consistently supported turning the airport land...

Why Nordstrom Says It’s Closing Its Santa Monica Place Location

June 30, 2025

June 30, 2025

A Nordstrom spokesperson explained the closure as a strategic realignment Nordstrom confirmed its decision to close its Santa Monica store...

Three-Bed Palisades Highlands Townhouse Hits Market for $1.7M

June 30, 2025

June 30, 2025

The Mediterranean-style property, located at 1529 Michael Lane, is part of a 71-unit community A remodeled 1,919-square-foot townhouse in the...

Six-Bed Mar Vista Hilltop Home Under Construction Lists for $5.3M

June 30, 2025

June 30, 2025

The private backyard is complete with a pool, spa, fire pit, built-in BBQ, and areas for outdoor dining A stunning...

(Video) Getty Villa Reopens Six Months After Dodging Destruction of Palisades Wildfires

June 29, 2025

June 29, 2025

With the reopening also comes a new exhibit, “The Kingdom of Pylos” Getty Villa Reopens Six Months After Dodging Destruction...

Free Virtual Planetarium Shows Coming to SMC in July

June 29, 2025

June 29, 2025

The virtual format is in place as construction of the new SMC Planetarium and Observatory nears completion The Santa Monica...

Santa Monica Adopts $793.3M Budget for FY25-27, Prioritizing Housing and Safety

June 29, 2025

June 29, 2025

The budget preserves core services and invests in major projects, including over $1 billion in hotel investments The Santa Monica...

Iranian Pastor in West L.A. Speaks as Church Rocked by Immigration Raids 

June 28, 2025

June 28, 2025

Five Detained as Fear Spreads Through Persian Christian Faith Community  Fear has spread through a West Los Angeles congregation after...

California Doubles Down on Hollywood: $750M in Tax Credits Approved for Film and TV Industry

June 28, 2025

June 28, 2025

State Lawmakers Back Major Expansion of Production Incentives, Raising Job Projections Los Angeles’ film and television industry is poised to...