June 14, 2024 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Late GOP Primary Hurting California: Elias:

Consider for a moment what this winter season of Republican presidential candidates lambasting each other while they traversed the countryside of early primary states might have been had California been involved.

Instead of watching the likes of Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Ron Paul, Rick Santorum, and the rest (plus the Super-PACs that buy many of their TV commercials) spend all their time and considerable fortune trying to get 12 New Hampshire delegate votes at next summer’s Republican National Convention, Californians could have seen them in person in Fresno and Anaheim. Instead of traveling the wintry cornfields of Iowa in quest of 28 convention votes, they could have been in Eureka and San Gabriel and Mountain View vying for California’s 172.

That’s about 20 percent of what it will take to win the nomination, and the top Republicans would not have been able to ignore any part of California, as they are now ignoring this entire state. Under California Republicans’ winner-take-all-by-congressional-district system, every part of the state could have been vital. Such a vote could have come in early February, as it did four years ago, when their performances here cinched the Republican nomination for John McCain and guaranteed that Hillary Clinton’s campaign would stay alive into late spring.

But California legislators – mostly Democrats – opted to make the state irrelevant this year, after experiencing several early presidential primaries that didn’t turn out quite as influential as some hoped they would be.

So they decided last summer to return this state’s primary to its traditional early June date, where it will likely decide very little on the national level. It has been 40 years since the last time any June presidential primary mattered to anyone.

As a result, Californians have not seen chartered buses with the names of Romney and Newt Gingrich painted large on their sides, as voters did in the early primary states. They will never get to see the likes of Michele Bachmann, Rick Perry, Jon Huntsman, and Herman Cain.

Catering companies and charter bus lines, newspapers and hotels, plus television stations and radio outlets lost the many millions of dollars those candidates would have had to spend here. Voters missed seeing the TV commercials that swung votes in the early states. Candidates did not have to address California issues from offshore oil drilling to high-speed rail to smog and home foreclosures. Although they have talked plenty about California-related issues like immigration and unemployment, none has promised California any help, as several did four years ago.

It wasn’t just vindictiveness that caused Democrats in Sacramento to make this state’s many GOP voters completely irrelevant in their party’s nomination process. There was also self-interest.

For no one knew at the time this decision was made in early summer what California’s new legislative and congressional districts would look like. An early primary could have forced politicians into decisions about whether and where to run for their next sinecure that they might later have come to regret. Even now, it’s not completely certain the new district lines drawn by the Citizens Redistricting Commission won’t be altered.

So politicians shied away from imposing early filing deadlines on themselves, dismissing the possibility of staging a presidential primary separate from other races as too expensive. Never mind that candidate spending could have pumped far more into the state economy that the approximate $40 million cost of a separate vote.

As a result, nothing much has happened here in presidential politics in this cycle. It’s still “way too early” for anything but fund-raising, say Republican Party officials.

But it didn’t have to be, and four years from now, when there will definitely be a contested Democratic presidential primary – and maybe contests in both parties – a late primary should not even be considered.

For California to be left completely out of the presidential nominating process while the likes of South Carolina and Nevada have influence is a classic example of the tail wagging the dog.

No early primary state save Florida has a fraction the diversity of California. None is nearly as representative of America’s panoply of ethnicities and interests.

So for California to have no voice simply makes no sense and a repeat of this year’s situation should never again be tolerated.

in Opinion
Related Posts

SM.a.r.t. Column: Shape Up – On Steroids

June 9, 2024

June 9, 2024

Nine years ago, SMa.r.t wrote a series of articles addressing the adaptive re-use of existing structures. We titled one “Shape...

SM.a.r.t Column: The Challenge of Running a City When City Staff Have Different Priorities

June 2, 2024

June 2, 2024

Living in a city has its perks, but it can be a real headache when the folks running the show...

SM.a.r.t. Column: A Path to Affordable Ownership in Santa Monica

May 27, 2024

May 27, 2024

[Note: our guest author today is Andres Drobny, a former Professor of Economics at the University of London, the former...

SM.a.r.t. Column: A Path Forward for Santa Monica: Part II

May 19, 2024

May 19, 2024

As referenced in Part I of this article, the state’s use of faulty statistics and forceful legislation has left a...

SM.a.r.t. Column: A Path Forward for Santa Monica: Part I

May 12, 2024

May 12, 2024

To quickly summarize, California grapples with an ongoing housing crisis spurred by state implementation of over 100 policies and mandates...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Where Will Our Huddled Masses Sleep? Navigating California’s Affordable Housing Mandates

May 5, 2024

May 5, 2024

Just as Lady Liberty beckons the “huddled masses” of immigrants to America, cities like Santa Monica have an ethical obligation...

SM.a.r.t Column: SMCLC SPEAKS

April 28, 2024

April 28, 2024

SMart (Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow) periodically invites guest columnists who have made a significant contribution to the...

SM.a.r.t Column: Building Modern Boxes Lacks Identity

April 21, 2024

April 21, 2024

In the relentless pursuit of modernity, cities worldwide have witnessed the rise of so-called architectural marvels in the form of...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Santa Monica Needs Responsible Urban and Architectural Design

April 14, 2024

April 14, 2024

[SMa.r.t. note: Eight years ago, our highly esteemed and recently-passed colleague Ron Goldman documented his thoughts on the need for...

SM.a.r.t. Column: BLINK NOW!

April 7, 2024

April 7, 2024

Nine years ago, I wrote a column for SMa.r.t. titled SANTA MONICA: BEACH TOWN OR ‘DINGBAT’ CITY? (https://smdp.com/2015/05/09/santa-monica-beach-town-dingbat-city/)Here is the...

SM.a.r.t Column: ARB Courage (Part 2 of 2)

March 31, 2024

March 31, 2024

Last week we discussed the numerous flaws of the Gelson’s project as a perfect example of what not to do...

ARB Courage (Part 1 of 2)

March 24, 2024

March 24, 2024

On March 4, 2024, your ARB (Architectural Review Board) ruled in favor of the 521-unit Gelson’s Project at Ocean Park...

SM.a.r.t Column: Can California ARBs Balance Affordable Housing with Community Character in the Face of New Housing Laws?

March 17, 2024

March 17, 2024

By suggestion, I attended the March 4th ARB (Architectural Review Board) meeting that addressed the Gelson Lincoln Boulevard Project.  After...

S.M.a.r.t Column: On the Need for Safety

March 10, 2024

March 10, 2024

Earlier this week, in the dark pre-dawn hours, a pair of thugs covered in masks and hoodies burst into the...

Film Review: The Oscar Landscape 2024

March 7, 2024

March 7, 2024

FILM REVIEWTHE OSCAR LANDSCAPE 2024A Look at the Choices – Academy Awards – March 10, 2024, at 5:00 p.m. on...