July 27, 2021 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Santa Monica College District Wastes Taxpayer Dollars On Meritless Appeal: OpEd:

By Mitra Moassessi / SMC Faculty Association president

In March of 2011, the Office of Academic Affairs sent a letter to three of our part-time Associate Faculty members informing them that their Associate Faculty status would be terminated at the end of the Spring 2011 semester. They were also informed that they would not receive additional assignments from Santa Monica College.

The letter referenced article 6.6.8 of the collective bargaining agreement between the District and the Santa Monica College Faculty Association, which lists the conditions under which the Associate Faculty status can be terminated.

Condition (b) provides associate faculty status can be terminated if “The associate faculty member fails to perform the normal and reasonable duties of his/her assignment or is otherwise guilty of misconduct as defined by Education Code 87732.”

In all three cases the faculty member’s termination was triggered by a complaint against the faculty member by a student, which resulted in investigations by the Office of Human Resources. The investigations consisted of interviews with the faculty member and students, none of which were under oath. In all three cases, the Office of Human Resources found the faculty members guilty of misconduct.

The Faculty Association didn’t agree with the decision of the court of Human Resources, a court in which the prosecutor and the judge were the same person. Furthermore, the Association believed that the investigation contained significant inaccuracies and the District offered no direct evidence to establish guilt. Consequently, the association filed grievances on the three cases, maintaining that the terminations of the faculty members were in violation of the contract.

The District denied that its decisions were in violation of the contract and claimed that Associate Faculty can be terminated “at-will” and the district is not obligated to prove guilt.

After going through the informal and formal process of the grievance procedure, as has been defined in article 12 of the collective bargaining agreement, all three cases resulted in arbitration, which is the final level of the grievance process.

Three different impartial arbitrators each reviewed one of the three cases and considered both sides of the arguments. The arbitrators issued their reports on January 9, 2012, February 10, 2012, and March 12, 2012. The three different and impartial arbitrators came to the same conclusion: the Association’s grievance was granted and the district must reinstate the faculty member.

Article 12.3.9 of the collective bargaining agreement between the District and the Santa Monica College Faculty Association states: “the decision of the impartial arbitrator shall be binding on the parties”.

In the history of the Faculty Association, every time a grievance has resulted in arbitration, the parties have agreed that binding arbitration means the decision of the arbitrator is binding and the parties must comply with it. Under the guidance of the district’s legal counsel, who is an hourly paid consultant, the word binding apparently does not actually mean binding. On April 17, 2012, the district filed a petition with the Superior Court of California to vacate the contractual binding arbitration awards, claiming that the arbitrators had exceeded their authority and the District had the right to terminate any part-time faculty, including Associate Faculty, at-will.

The petition to vacate the arbitrators’ decision was heard at the Superior Court of California, Santa Monica Courthouse, on June 26, 2012. Two months later the Association received the court’s ruling. The court denied the district’s petition to vacate the arbitration award and granted the Association’s request to confirm the arbitration award.

On October 2, 2012, the Board of Trustees discussed the ruling of the Superior Court of California at their closed session. On October 3, the district filed an appeal of the Superior Court’s decision with the California Court of Appeals. That appeal remains pending.

According to a document provided by the District’s Fiscal Services, the total cost of these three cases, not including the staff time, for the period of July 2011 to October 1, 2012 has been $74,648.38. That is more than the annual salary of a full-time faculty member with a PhD and six years of experience. Obviously the District believes that spending tax payer money to keep part-time faculty unemployed is a sensible way to be fiscally responsible and fulfills the Board of Trustees’ fiduciary responsibility.

The decision of three impartial arbitrators and the Superior Court of California has apparently not satisfied the District’s desire to completely ignore its binding, contractual obligations. Instead, the District is wasting taxpayer dollars on a completely meritless appeal.

The Faculty Association anxiously awaits the California Court of Appeal’s denial of the District’s appeal.

in News
Related Posts

Two Arrested for Main Street Bike Shop Burglary

July 23, 2021

July 23, 2021

Two suspects were arrested for the burglary of a Main Street bike store after the owner witnessed the crime via...

Council Selects Berkeley Deputy City Manager to Helm Santa Monica

July 23, 2021

July 23, 2021

David White to be Santa Monica’s next City Manager starting in October  By Sam Catanzaro Santa Monica City Council has...

Ocean Park Library Set to Reopen

July 20, 2021

July 20, 2021

New self-service hours begin July 28 By Sam Catanzaro The Santa Monica Public Library’s Ocean Park Branch is set to...

Police Tase Suspect Following Santa Monica Beach Stabbing

July 19, 2021

July 19, 2021

32-year-old man arrested Sunday evening on Santa Monica Beach, suffers head injuries in arrest By Sam Catanzaro As part of...

Santa Monica Beat: Santa Monica Beat – July 19, 2021

July 19, 2021

July 19, 2021

Local news and culture in under 5 minutes. * Serial Killer Arrested by SMPD Sentenced to Death * New Grants...

Santa Monica May Ban Lobbyists From Serving on Boards and Commissions

July 19, 2021

July 19, 2021

City Council instructs staff to draft ordinance to bar paid policy advocates from serving on board, commissions, task forces   By...

Water Near Santa Monica Pier Remains Questionable as Beach Closures Lifted Following Sewage Discharge

July 15, 2021

July 15, 2021

17 million gallons of raw sewage discharged from Hyperion Water Reclamation Plant Sunday Night By Sam Catanzaro Beach closures have...

Edify TV: Local Cafe Supporting Foster Youths

July 14, 2021

July 14, 2021

La La Land Kind Cafe recently opened its first California location in Santa Monica, delivering not only unique coffee and...

Santa Monica Experiencing 9-1-1 Call Outage

July 13, 2021

July 13, 2021

Update: As of 3 p.m., 9-1-1 phone service in Santa Monica has been fully restored. Please call or text 9-1-1...

Santa Monica Settles Consumer Protection Lawsuit With Match.com: Santa Monica Beat – July 12, 2021

July 12, 2021

July 12, 2021

Local news and culture in under 5 minutes. * Santa Monica Settles Consumer Protection Lawsuit With Match.com* SMPD and Services...

17 Million Gallons of Raw Sewage Spills Into Santa Monica Bay

July 12, 2021

July 12, 2021

Sunday night spillage occurs 1-mile offshore from Hyperion Water Reclamation Plant By Sam Catanzaro 17 million gallons of raw sewage...

Santa Monica Settles Consumer Protection Lawsuit With Match.com

July 12, 2021

July 12, 2021

Santa Monica among handful of California cities included in lawsuit By Chad Winthrop Santa Monica and a handful of California...

New Plans For Offices Near Santa Monica’s Memorial Park Revealed

July 12, 2021

July 12, 2021

Designs call for nearly 40,000 square feet of office space By Toi Creel Santa Monica is getting a new look...