June 24, 2024 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Fracking Fantasy: Letter To The Editor:

Dear Editor,

I read with both interest and some consternation the April 6 article by Thomas Elias touting the potential miracle cure of fracking to what ails the California economy.  I think a little more homework and research is required.  For eight years I served as a senior advisor to Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell, a period where with the Governor’s encouragement fracking literally exploded onto the bucolic scene that is rural Pennsylvania.

California would do well to look closely at the deliberative efforts underway in New York State, where the Governor and Assembly are wrestling over the question of whether or not to lift the moratorium imposed there several years ago, but also to carefully look at some of the disasters that have befallen other states like Pennsylvania before jumping headfirst into what may actually be a very toxic pool indeed.

Also, it is with stunned amazement that the article did not even mention legislation offered by former Santa Monica Mayor and current Assemblyman Richard Bloom that would impose a moratorium until many unanswered questions are both raised and answered satisfactorily with regard to public health and environmental impacts of this extractive process. Relying on a study that was funded by the oil and gas industry as to the potential benefits of a process that will add to the unfathomable profits reaped by that very industry seems to be a very dicey proposition to say the least.

From my experiences with fracking, and I have seen it up close and personal, there are five major areas of concern here in the Golden State: first, there is the question of water, both quality and quantity; second, there is a question of air contamination; third, the issue of adverse public health impacts; fourth, there is a growing concern over the issue of induced earthquakes; and lastly, the overriding concern over worsening the effects of climate change.

Fracking requires large amounts of water mixed with sand and many toxic chemicals that have trade secret protection and are not known to the public.  Disposal of fracked water is a problem as well. Whether drilling for natural gas or oil the extraction process is subject to an unacceptable percentage of methane leakage. Methane is 105 times more dangerous than Carbon Dioxide over a twenty-year period.  Public health impacts from exposure to carcinogens have led to increased incidences of asthma, heightened cancer clusters around drilling sites, and many of the chemicals used in the process are known to cause developmental problems to unborn in the womb.  Injecting fracked water that returns to the surface into deep injection wells has recently resulted in increased earthquake activity in Oklahoma.

And last but certainly not least the overall impacts of drilling the depths of Mother Earth for every last drop of fossil fuel will only exacerbate the already catastrophic trajectory we are witnessing with respect to global warming and climate change.

These questions must be dealt with before we accelerate the process not after it is underway. A moratorium not only makes good common sense, but it is sound policy that protects the public. We must also be focused on the appropriate question which is not whether or not we should reduce our dependence on foreign oil, of course the answer is yes, but rather we should spend our political capital and financial resources on weaning this nation off of our addiction to fossil fuels, where once again the answer is clearly yes.

The long-term potential of fracking must be examined on a comprehensive, evidence-based and scientifically validated and peer-reviewed set of data that places people over profits. Quite simply we need to place our children and grandchildren above the search for immediate gratification.  

Assemblymenbers Bloom and Holly Mitchell deserve credit for showing vision and courage and should be rewarded with adoption of legislation that stresses the precautionary approach, to essentially do no harm.  And in the end we must be willing to accept that at the end of the day fracking is not the future.

Lance Simmens

Simmens recently taught Public Policy at Santa Monica College and has spent over 36 years involved in public service at the Federal, State and local levels of government.

in Opinion
Related Posts

SM.a.r.t Column: The Up Zoning Scam (Part 2)

June 23, 2024

June 23, 2024

Last week’s SMart article  (https://smmirror.com/2024/06/sm-a-r-t-column-the-up-zoning-scam-part-1/)  discussed the ambitious 8895 units (including 6168 affordable units) that Santa Monica is required to...

SM.a.r.t Column: The Up Zoning Scam (Part 1)

June 16, 2024

June 16, 2024

Over the last few years, the State of California has mandated a massive upzoning of cities to create capacity for...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Shape Up – On Steroids

June 9, 2024

June 9, 2024

Nine years ago, SMa.r.t wrote a series of articles addressing the adaptive re-use of existing structures. We titled one “Shape...

SM.a.r.t Column: The Challenge of Running a City When City Staff Have Different Priorities

June 2, 2024

June 2, 2024

Living in a city has its perks, but it can be a real headache when the folks running the show...

SM.a.r.t. Column: A Path to Affordable Ownership in Santa Monica

May 27, 2024

May 27, 2024

[Note: our guest author today is Andres Drobny, a former Professor of Economics at the University of London, the former...

SM.a.r.t. Column: A Path Forward for Santa Monica: Part II

May 19, 2024

May 19, 2024

As referenced in Part I of this article, the state’s use of faulty statistics and forceful legislation has left a...

SM.a.r.t. Column: A Path Forward for Santa Monica: Part I

May 12, 2024

May 12, 2024

To quickly summarize, California grapples with an ongoing housing crisis spurred by state implementation of over 100 policies and mandates...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Where Will Our Huddled Masses Sleep? Navigating California’s Affordable Housing Mandates

May 5, 2024

May 5, 2024

Just as Lady Liberty beckons the “huddled masses” of immigrants to America, cities like Santa Monica have an ethical obligation...

SM.a.r.t Column: SMCLC SPEAKS

April 28, 2024

April 28, 2024

SMart (Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow) periodically invites guest columnists who have made a significant contribution to the...

SM.a.r.t Column: Building Modern Boxes Lacks Identity

April 21, 2024

April 21, 2024

In the relentless pursuit of modernity, cities worldwide have witnessed the rise of so-called architectural marvels in the form of...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Santa Monica Needs Responsible Urban and Architectural Design

April 14, 2024

April 14, 2024

[SMa.r.t. note: Eight years ago, our highly esteemed and recently-passed colleague Ron Goldman documented his thoughts on the need for...

SM.a.r.t. Column: BLINK NOW!

April 7, 2024

April 7, 2024

Nine years ago, I wrote a column for SMa.r.t. titled SANTA MONICA: BEACH TOWN OR ‘DINGBAT’ CITY? (https://smdp.com/2015/05/09/santa-monica-beach-town-dingbat-city/)Here is the...

SM.a.r.t Column: ARB Courage (Part 2 of 2)

March 31, 2024

March 31, 2024

Last week we discussed the numerous flaws of the Gelson’s project as a perfect example of what not to do...

ARB Courage (Part 1 of 2)

March 24, 2024

March 24, 2024

On March 4, 2024, your ARB (Architectural Review Board) ruled in favor of the 521-unit Gelson’s Project at Ocean Park...

SM.a.r.t Column: Can California ARBs Balance Affordable Housing with Community Character in the Face of New Housing Laws?

March 17, 2024

March 17, 2024

By suggestion, I attended the March 4th ARB (Architectural Review Board) meeting that addressed the Gelson Lincoln Boulevard Project.  After...