May 26, 2022 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Giant Mouse Attacks Holiday, Then Retreats:

When we were kids my father fabricated a Christmas decoration for our front yard out of an old poster and some plywood. The poster had been advertising for Coca Cola that featured the cherry-cheeked Santa Claus often seen pausing to refresh with a Coke during the Christmases of that era. That Santa, once it was deployed by Coke for various nostalgic Christmas advertisements, became the property of Coke but felt like it belonged to all Americans.

My father used a jigsaw to cut the bottle of Coke from Santa’s hand, thus producing a nearly life-size Santa shellacked to plywood that appeared to either be waving to folks passing by our home, or perhaps trying to hitch a ride. We kept and used that holiday decoration for several decades and not once were we threatened with litigation by the Coca Cola people.

Maybe successfully appropriating Coke’s Santa caused me to grow up thinking giant corporations are never out to actually own life itself, or the moments that make up life such as holidays. But then, I don’t work for Disney.

The business section of the May 9 Los Angeles Times ran a headline that actually read: “Disney ends bid to trademark holiday.”

The story reported that Disney had given-up on its attempt to trademark the Latin American holiday “Dia de los Muertos” in connection with an animated feature “inspired” by the holiday (which translates to “Day of the Dead”) after a public outcry from those who found that effort to be somewhat insensitive.  

There were even stats to measure the upset: An internet petition meant to stop Disney from taking the action gathered more than 21,000 signatures in a little over 24 hours.  Whether or not Disney ever saw the writing on the wall, it was apparently able to read the writing online. Grace Sesma, the creator of the petition, probably said it best: “Our spiritual traditions are for everyone, not for companies like Walt Disney to trademark and exploit. I am deeply offended and dismayed that a family-oriented company like Walt Disney would seek to own the rights to something that is the rightful heritage of the people of Mexico.”

Which gets us back to Santa Claus. Coke owns specific imagery of Santa Claus; Disney didn’t use those images when it appropriated the entire idea of Santa Claus to make the feature film “The Santa Clause” in 1994. Certain objections might have been skirted by adding that “e” to “Clause,” which related to a document involved in the film’s plot line.  Another part of the plot line was that actor Tim Allen’s character accidentally kills the real Santa Claus, but hey… kids back in 1994 also saw Simba’s uncle Scar kill Mufasa.  That year of the so-called “Disney Renaissance” seemed to accommodate death in children’s products. Two sequels to “The Santa Clause” followed the original, or let’s say, first film.

It’s true that many charming classic holiday films freely utilize Santa Claus and all the ideas that go with him such as a list of good and bad kids or elves working for the sheer joy of it. Not as many kill off the real Santa and replace him with a kid’s father but then if the story or holiday is there for the taking… what the heck? Mel Gibson got to do what he wanted, and that was with Jesus.

And then, eventually, maybe enough is enough. That appears to be what happened with the blowback on Disney’s reach for “Dia de los Muertos.” I don’t remember that there was an outcry against tampering with Santa Claus when Tim Allen first put on his red suit, but what if Disney tried to develop an Easter project? You know what, let me take that back. I don’t want to start any wheels turning.

It’s probably worthwhile to note that Disney filed 10 applications with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for “Dia de los Muertos” including applications pertaining to toys, cereal, and jewelry. Imagine being a parent in a home where Dia de los Muertos – with its roots in Aztec culture – is always celebrated with altars, decoration of graves and holiday processions. Then your kids start asking you about all the new Disney “Dia de los Muertos” toys and jewelry. Suddenly, it appears there’s some official ’merch’ to go with the otherwise folk art celebrations.

Appropriating cultural iconography to make money will, hopefully, always be a tricky business.  Not just because Edmund Gwenn in “Miracle on 34th Street” will always make a better Santa than anyone else, but because even though we’re not surprised when corporations attempt to control the roots of culture… we’re always disappointed. Don’t some of the people at Disney have children and families with pride in their varied backgrounds and heritage? Sure they do. They’re just not working in the board room over there.

in Opinion
Related Posts

​​Doubt Removed: Oil Refiners Gouging Us

May 23, 2022

May 23, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist There was some room for doubt back in February, when gasoline prices rose precipitously: Until the...

Is the Big Housing Crunch Mostly Fiction?

May 20, 2022

May 20, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist In some parts of California, there is definitely a housing crunch: small supplies of homes for...

Is Gelson’s Our Future? Bigger Is Not Better & Not Necessary! – Part 2

May 20, 2022

May 20, 2022

The dream of our beachfront city is about to become a nightmare! Just imagine a tsunami of these projects washing...

Column From Santa Monica Mayor Himmelrich: We Walk the Talk

May 12, 2022

May 12, 2022

By Sue Himmelrich, Santa Moncia Mayor  I like the SMa.r.t. architects. I often agree with them. But in allowing Mark...

Is Gelson’s Our Future? Bigger Is Not Better!

May 12, 2022

May 12, 2022

It’s appalling to see what’s happening in our city – projects recently built or about to be approved – in...

Renting Your Second Home

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

If you are among the many Americans who own a second home that you occasionally use as a vacation getaway,...

Column: Cities Fight to Maintain Distinctive Characters

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist Anyone who knows California well will realize that Palo Alto does not look much like nearby...

SMa.r.t. Column: Gelson’s, Boxed-In

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

This week we are re-visiting an article from 2018 regarding the Miramar project, by simply replacing the word “Miramar” with...

Column: Are You Talking Yourself Out of Saving for Retirement? Here’s How to Break the Habit

May 5, 2022

May 5, 2022

Saving for retirement can be an abstract concept. It’s something we all know we should do, but the farther away...

SMa.r.t. Column: Failure to Plan…

April 30, 2022

April 30, 2022

Over the last approximately two years your City has been busy trying to respond to new California laws that are...

Letter to Editor: Your “Standing Firm With Santa Monica” Initiative

April 25, 2022

April 25, 2022

The following is an open letter to Councilmember Sue Himmelrich from Santa Monica resident Arthur Jeon regarding a proposed transfer...

SMa.r.t. Column: Planning The Real Future

April 24, 2022

April 24, 2022

In the 1970s, renowned USC architecture professor Ralph Knowles developed a method for planning and designing cities that would dramatically...

SMa.r.t. Column: New City Financial Plan: The Resident Homeowner Bank

April 15, 2022

April 15, 2022

Part II: Who pays the proposed transfer tax and where does the money go? Last week, we introduced the proposed...

Column: NIMBYs Getting a Bad Rap

April 8, 2022

April 8, 2022

By Tom Elias Rarely has a major group of Californians suffered a less deserved rash of insults and attacks than...

SMa.r.t. Column: New City Financial Plan – The Resident Homeowner Bank

April 8, 2022

April 8, 2022

Part 1 of 2 In this two-part article, we will discuss both the proposed transfer tax ballot initiative and the...