June 23, 2021 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Seeing Pico Youth & Family Center’s Genius: Op-Ed:

Editor’s Note: This is an Op-Ed from Angel Villasenor who is a Syracuse University graduate student in Cultural Foundations of Education Program. He grew up in the Pico Neighborhood and attended PYFC as a youth. 

Prior to working with the Pico Youth & Family Center I worked for the city of Santa Monica, as a Community Service Program Specialist, at Virginia Avenue Park’s Teen Center.

Although we serviced much of the same youth populations, we didn’t do what the PYFC does.

Most youth centers focus on outcomes, meaning they quantify success measuring numbers by calibrating the academic achievement, employment and non-employment of their participants.

The PYFC is held to the same standards, and structurally functions the same way; but it does something else.

When a person walks into the PYFC they are greeted by a community based mural highlighting African-American and Latino heritage.

As you continue through the center you will be struck by life size portraits of civil rights heroes Malcolm X, Cesar Chavez and Rigoberta Menchu.

You will also notice a banner that hangs as an overhead in front of the center’s main office that reads “Ya Basta!”, and although it loses some of its essence when translated into English, it means “Enough.”

The PYFC is an organization founded on the principles of social justice and as an organization it embodies those principles in everything that it does.

This community centered approach, which city of Santa Monica officials call “unorthodox” and “deficient”, has been widely accepted in social science research as being effective in helping to foster and develop positive self-identities among underprivileged youth.

In fact in a Supreme Court case, Fisher v. University of Texas Austin, social scientist document just how effective strategies such as Inter and Intra-group dialogue, civic engagement, service learning, and cultural awareness and leadership are at countering some of the forces that stigmatize students of color.

Intergroup Dialogue in the form of Black and Brown unity workshops reduces prejudices across difference and helps develop cultural and racial competence.

Civic engagement and community organizing allow youth to be agents of social change and empowers them in ways standardized forms of learning cannot.

PYFC’s barrio service learning program where undergraduates from UCLA and CSUN serve as mentors and role models, is also cited in research as best practice because it encourages underprivileged youth to pursue college.

The cultural awareness component is the most valuable strategy because it affirms the identities of youth of color and enriches their understanding of themselves.

These strategies are emphasized nationwide by groups such as the Detroit Youth Dialogue, City of University New York’s (CUNY) Public Science Project, and Syracuse Universities Intergroup Dialogue’s Spotlighting Justice program.

These social justice principles function to improve and service the needs of their communities.

As a critical race theory student and a social justice educator I assure you these methods are heavily cited in social science research as innovative educational practices.

So why then when used by a grassroots youth center is it deemed inefficient?

What is inefficient is the way most Santa Monica youth centers operate because they overlook the cultural component and competency required to best serve the demographics of the Pico neighborhood.

By this I’m not talking about tokenized celebrations of race and culture, I am talking about how race and culture should strategically be a part of the principles from which these organizations are founded.

At the Virginia Avenue Park Teen Center, we worked with youth and families from the community to build an “altar”, a traditional Latino practice used there to memorialize the youth and young adults lost in our community.

Many of them were victims of gang-violence.

When I left the organization this memorial was removed from the place where it stood for five years.

Opponents argued it was controversial, maybe a bit “too ethnic”, so reverting back to “policy” and institutional practices the city staff removed the long standing community based memorial.

To them it was about policy to us it was yet another racist microagression used to alienate former VAP loyalist and lifelong community members.

Whether or not city staff understood this, the removal of a culturally affirming and community built memorial, can only be interpreted as an insensitive and discriminatory act.

Most people don’t understand that racism is more than just overt isolated acts of discrimination.

It is also covert, systemic and institutionalized operating to disadvantage and disenfranchises people of color.

For example the fact that there has never been a Pico neighborhood resident of color on Santa Monica’s city council, is a form is systemic racism.

The Pico neighborhood is home to the majority of Santa Monica’s African-American and Latino community.

This means that there has not been one single city council member with firsthand knowledge of the conditions plaguing the Pico neighborhood community.

This sends the message that our needs are not valued by our leaders

Unfortunately the PYFC is currently on a lifeline and may be defunded by our city council this June. All we ask is why?

I can’t help but be reminded of the racism that’s going on in Tucson, Arizona where their school district’s Mexican American Studies program was forcefully shut down; a program the graduated over 90 percent of its cohort each year.

There are parallels between what happened in Arizona and what is happening here in Santa Monica.

Arizona school board members and elected officials banned the program without attempting to witness firsthand the transformative affects this program had on its students.

Much like Santa Monica’s city Manager, Rod Gould, who has never stepped foot inside of the PYFC yet he is proposing to defund it.

That is a perplexing thought to fathom given that the previous city manager Lamont Ewell allotted PYFC with an additional $100,000 dollars to help move and upgrade its facility after he spent a mere two hours inside the PYFC some years ago.

Need I remind you, Lamont Ewell is an African-American and understood that the PYFC serves a need that most other youth organizations do not.

This again brings us to the question of why?

I hope this helps you grasp how questioning financial deficiencies (that have been rectified) is code for racism.

City staff claims to the community that if PYFC is defunded they will appoint their staff to continue program operations. This is delusional.

How would you feel as a youth walking in to the center you’ve come to know and love, to find that your friends, role-models, mentors, case managers, executive director, and ultimately the people you attribute as being life-savers are no longer there?

I can’t imagine such trauma either!

Fortunately PYFC, its allies and community members understand that progress  never came easy and they will stand together with the youth to do whatever it takes to keep the PYFC and everything its stands for alive!

Like the old saying goes, where there is no justice there is no peace.

Angel Villasenor

in Opinion
Related Posts

Letters to Editor: Main Street Closures

June 7, 2021

June 7, 2021

The following are two letters sent to the Santa Monica Mirror, one in support and one in opposition, regarding a...

Opinion: A Man, a Mural, and a Mess

May 22, 2021

May 22, 2021

By Will South A mural is being covered over inside the historic landmark Santa Monica City Hall building. This decision...

How to Heal the Soil and Why

May 11, 2021

May 11, 2021

By Andy Lopez We all know how important the vital role the soil plays in your plants’ health, trees, and...

Food Review: A Cluckin’ Good Chicken Taco

April 22, 2021

April 22, 2021

Breaking down chicken, pork and beef tacos from LOQUI By Kerry Slater A Westside taco spot, while a bit pricey,...