May 24, 2025 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Community Benefits Lacking For Transit Improvements: Letter To The Editor:

Dear Editor,

I recently attended the monthly NOMA (North of Montana Association) meeting and shook my head in disbelief when a Big Blue Bus representative explained there is new planning management who will be looking at alternative routes to connect with the Expo line as there is no parking, other than street parking, connected to the three Santa Monica stations. 

But when I asked if Little Blue Buses (i.e. mini buses or jitneys) were being considered to connect these three stations with N-S cross-town access, I was dumbfounded to hear that money was not available for additional vehicles. 

It was explained that the city’s general fund doesn’t provide for the Big Blue Bus who is on its own financially even though they are a department of the city!

WE ARE GIVING DEVELOPERS INCREASED DENSITY AND MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN PROFIT, AND IN RETURN WE ARE GETTING MINIMAL COMMUNITY BENEFITS ALONG WITH THIS INCREASED DENSITY AND THE TRAFFIC IT BRINGS. WHERE ARE THE COMMUNITY BENEFITS GOING IF NOT TO SOLVE THESE TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS??

In approving Development Agreements, the city routinely asks for TIF’s (Transportation Infrastructure Fees) and TDM’s (Transportation Demand Management fees).

Where are these funds going? And don’t you just love these seductive acronyms – intended to make you feel the city knows what they are doing. 

In Washington today, government listens to and benefits primarily lobbyists, and in Santa Monica, local government benefits developers and their attorneys. 

Money dictates the future of our city and sadly, as a fellow architect recently suggested, our culture and environmental capital is being mined by outsiders.

Is the anxiety over tax revenues worth architectural and environmental mediocrity? And when we reach this level of mediocrity, where do we go except higher and denser – kind of like a ponzi scheme as another fellow architect suggested. 

Greed is not synonymous with quality of life. And so-called “community benefits” don’t begin to equate with the density and profit being handed to developers.

In any event, no amount of community benefit can make a poor project a good project.

Ron Goldman

Santa Monica

in Opinion
<>Related Posts

SM.a.r.t Column: Why Santa Monica Might Need a Desalination Plant, and Maybe Even Nuclear Power

May 22, 2025

May 22, 2025

Santa Monica is known for its ocean views, sunny skies, and strong environmental values. But there’s a challenge on the...

SM.a.r.t Column: SMO (So Many Options) Part 3: “Pie in the Sky”

May 17, 2025

May 17, 2025

SMO: Fantasy, Fact, and the Fog of Wishful ThinkingBy someone who read the fine print Every few months, a headline...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Owner Occupancy Protects Against Corporate Over-Development

May 2, 2025

May 2, 2025

This week SMa.r.t. will have as guest columnist Mark Borenstein. Mark is a long-time Santa Monica resident, a retired attorney,...

Opinion: Declaration of Economic State of Emergency in Malibu & Pacific Palisades: A Direct Result of the Devastating Impact of the Palisades Fire

April 27, 2025

April 27, 2025

Malibu and Pacific Palisades Request Emergency Financial Measures By Ramis Sadrieh, Chairperson, Malibu Pacific Palisades Chamber of Commerce    On behalf...

SM.a.r.t Column: The World’s Happiest Cities

April 27, 2025

April 27, 2025

Almost every year, we see new cities, regions, and countries that make the list(s) of our planet’s happiest and healthiest...

SM.a.r.t Column: A City for Everyone

April 20, 2025

April 20, 2025

Santa Monica dazzles with its ocean views, sunshine, and laid-back charm. But beyond the postcard image lies a more complicated...

SM.a.r.t Column: Part II: Rebuilding Resilient Communities: Policy and Planning After the Fires

April 13, 2025

April 13, 2025

The January 2025 wildfires that devastated Pacific Palisades and Altadena left an indelible mark on Los Angeles County. Beyond the...

SM.a.r.t Column: Innovative Materials for Fire-Resistant Rebuilding After the LA Fires

April 6, 2025

April 6, 2025

In the aftermath of the devastating 2025 Los Angeles wildfires, homeowners face the daunting task of rebuilding their lives and...

Opinion: Supervisor Lindsey P. Horvath Community Column Regarding a More Accountable Homeless Services System

April 3, 2025

April 3, 2025

By Lindsay Horvath, Los Angeles Board of Supervisors This week marks a significant milestone in our fight to end homelessness...

SM.a.r.t Column: Bring Back The Music 2.0

March 23, 2025

March 23, 2025

This is an update of the article appearing in the SM Mirror on Feb 1, 2025 On January 28th, 2025,...

Letter to the Editor: Close the Fairview Library??

March 17, 2025

March 17, 2025

By the Santa Monica Public Library Board, Judith Meister, Chair, Dana Newman, Vice Chair Antonio Spears, Boardmember Daniel Cody, Board Member...

SM.a.r.t Column: Fire Safety in Los Angeles: Reimagining an Age of Megafires

March 16, 2025

March 16, 2025

Los Angeles stands at a critical juncture in its relationship with fire. It is true that climate change intensified vegetations...

Santa Monica Civic Auditorium: The Cultural Icon Santa Monica Needs

March 9, 2025

March 9, 2025

Santa Monica is a city of innovation, creativity, and world-class attractions, yet it lacks a central cultural destination that reflects...

SM.a.r.t Column: The Perils of Passing the Buck: How Self-Certification Threatens Public Safety in Building Design and Construction

March 2, 2025

March 2, 2025

In the bustling city of Santa Monica, California, a quiet revolution is underway in the world of building design and...

SM.a.r.t Column: Bring Back The Music

February 16, 2025

February 16, 2025

On January 28th, 2025, the City Council did a wise thing and agreed to continue the process, for 30 days,...