May 28, 2022 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Community Benefits Lacking For Transit Improvements: Letter To The Editor:

Dear Editor,

I recently attended the monthly NOMA (North of Montana Association) meeting and shook my head in disbelief when a Big Blue Bus representative explained there is new planning management who will be looking at alternative routes to connect with the Expo line as there is no parking, other than street parking, connected to the three Santa Monica stations. 

But when I asked if Little Blue Buses (i.e. mini buses or jitneys) were being considered to connect these three stations with N-S cross-town access, I was dumbfounded to hear that money was not available for additional vehicles. 

It was explained that the city’s general fund doesn’t provide for the Big Blue Bus who is on its own financially even though they are a department of the city!

WE ARE GIVING DEVELOPERS INCREASED DENSITY AND MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN PROFIT, AND IN RETURN WE ARE GETTING MINIMAL COMMUNITY BENEFITS ALONG WITH THIS INCREASED DENSITY AND THE TRAFFIC IT BRINGS. WHERE ARE THE COMMUNITY BENEFITS GOING IF NOT TO SOLVE THESE TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS??

In approving Development Agreements, the city routinely asks for TIF’s (Transportation Infrastructure Fees) and TDM’s (Transportation Demand Management fees).

Where are these funds going? And don’t you just love these seductive acronyms – intended to make you feel the city knows what they are doing. 

In Washington today, government listens to and benefits primarily lobbyists, and in Santa Monica, local government benefits developers and their attorneys. 

Money dictates the future of our city and sadly, as a fellow architect recently suggested, our culture and environmental capital is being mined by outsiders.

Is the anxiety over tax revenues worth architectural and environmental mediocrity? And when we reach this level of mediocrity, where do we go except higher and denser – kind of like a ponzi scheme as another fellow architect suggested. 

Greed is not synonymous with quality of life. And so-called “community benefits” don’t begin to equate with the density and profit being handed to developers.

In any event, no amount of community benefit can make a poor project a good project.

Ron Goldman

Santa Monica

in Opinion
Related Posts

Affordable Spaces for Small Business

May 27, 2022

May 27, 2022

Los Angeles County recently proposed a program providing financial incentives for certain “Legacy” family businesses in their original historical location....

​​Doubt Removed: Oil Refiners Gouging Us

May 23, 2022

May 23, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist There was some room for doubt back in February, when gasoline prices rose precipitously: Until the...

Is the Big Housing Crunch Mostly Fiction?

May 20, 2022

May 20, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist In some parts of California, there is definitely a housing crunch: small supplies of homes for...

Is Gelson’s Our Future? Bigger Is Not Better & Not Necessary! – Part 2

May 20, 2022

May 20, 2022

The dream of our beachfront city is about to become a nightmare! Just imagine a tsunami of these projects washing...

Column From Santa Monica Mayor Himmelrich: We Walk the Talk

May 12, 2022

May 12, 2022

By Sue Himmelrich, Santa Moncia Mayor  I like the SMa.r.t. architects. I often agree with them. But in allowing Mark...

Is Gelson’s Our Future? Bigger Is Not Better!

May 12, 2022

May 12, 2022

It’s appalling to see what’s happening in our city – projects recently built or about to be approved – in...

Renting Your Second Home

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

If you are among the many Americans who own a second home that you occasionally use as a vacation getaway,...

Column: Cities Fight to Maintain Distinctive Characters

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist Anyone who knows California well will realize that Palo Alto does not look much like nearby...

SMa.r.t. Column: Gelson’s, Boxed-In

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

This week we are re-visiting an article from 2018 regarding the Miramar project, by simply replacing the word “Miramar” with...

Column: Are You Talking Yourself Out of Saving for Retirement? Here’s How to Break the Habit

May 5, 2022

May 5, 2022

Saving for retirement can be an abstract concept. It’s something we all know we should do, but the farther away...

SMa.r.t. Column: Failure to Plan…

April 30, 2022

April 30, 2022

Over the last approximately two years your City has been busy trying to respond to new California laws that are...

Letter to Editor: Your “Standing Firm With Santa Monica” Initiative

April 25, 2022

April 25, 2022

The following is an open letter to Councilmember Sue Himmelrich from Santa Monica resident Arthur Jeon regarding a proposed transfer...

SMa.r.t. Column: Planning The Real Future

April 24, 2022

April 24, 2022

In the 1970s, renowned USC architecture professor Ralph Knowles developed a method for planning and designing cities that would dramatically...

SMa.r.t. Column: New City Financial Plan: The Resident Homeowner Bank

April 15, 2022

April 15, 2022

Part II: Who pays the proposed transfer tax and where does the money go? Last week, we introduced the proposed...

Column: NIMBYs Getting a Bad Rap

April 8, 2022

April 8, 2022

By Tom Elias Rarely has a major group of Californians suffered a less deserved rash of insults and attacks than...