January 22, 2025 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Outdoor Fitness Coalition: Palisades Park Flat-Fee Higher Than Ever Suggested:

Editor’s Note: This is an open letter to the Santa Monica City Council from the Santa Monica Outdoor Fitness Coalition regarding the council’s vote to implement a one-year pilot program that regulates outdoor fitness classes.

Dear City Council,

The issue of regulating fitness training in Santa Monica city parks has been debated for more than a year, and last week the city council deliberated on an ordinance that would formalize that regulatory and permitting process.

Related: Santa Monica Outdoor Fitness Programs To Be Costly, Restrictive

Related: In The Chair: Santa Monica Outdoor Fitness Coalition’s Erin Dick

The proposed ordinance represented a fair and equitable compromise that would continue to allow training in certain parks while imposing noise, equipment and time restrictions; training zones with caps on the number of groups that can train in each zone; and a limit on group sizes. The ordinance also proposed a use fee structure based on percentage of gross revenues paid by the trainers to the city.

The fees would be 10 percent of annual gross revenues for the use of approved parks, with the exception of Palisades Park where a 50 percent increase would be imposed, making the use fee 15 percent of gross annual revenues.

This fee increase for use of Palisades places a premium on what is unquestionably a very special park.

While some of the proposed restrictions would change the way trainers use the park, the Santa Monica Outdoor Fitness Coalition recognized it as a fair compromise, and supported the proposed regulatory framework.

However, during the final moments of deliberation, and after the public comment period was over, the city council dramatically changed direction on the fee structure going from a percentage based on revenue to a flat-fee structure.

The fees proposed were $1,800 for one-on-one or one-on-two training, $3,600 for small group training (3-10 people), and $5,400 for large group training (10-15 people).

The council also opted to carry over the 50 percent increase for Palisades suggested in the original ordinance. This 50 percent increase is reasonable when applied to a fee structure based on percentage of gross revenues, but when applied to a flat fee structure, it adds thousands to the fees and makes group training in Palisades completely unaffordable for small businesses. This 50 percent increase applied to a flat fee amounts to a backdoor ban on group training in Palisade.

The average trainer makes $40,000 annually. Using the percentage of gross revenues fee structure proposed by staff, 15 percent of that revenue would amount to a use fee of $6,000 to train groups in Palisades. For that same trainer, the flat-fee structure would require a fee of $8,100 – more than 20 percent of a small business’ annual revenues. This percentage is higher than was ever suggested by council or staff, and makes group training in Palisades completely out of reach except among the wealthy.

The fitness professionals who train the groups of moms working out with their babies in strollers and the seniors taking Thai-Chi, they are not in business to get rich. They are offering a needed service to people with modest incomes who can’t afford one-on-one training.

The Coalition is not opposed to a flat fee and recognizes the benefits to the city in fee collection and ease of enforcement. But these trainers will be out of business if required to pay 20 percent of their annual revenues.

We are very close to achieving a victory for our city, community, and small businesses by working together to negotiate a fair compromise. It would be such a loss after all parties have worked so hard, for that fair compromise to turn into heavy-handed overregulation because of a hastily-made decision that didn’t include public comment.

We hope that the council will reconsider the fees proposed, and adjust them to reflect the intent of the staff report and the comments and input of the majority of the public and the personal trainers who offer a needed service to our community.

—Santa Monica Outdoor Fitness Coalition

in Opinion
<>Related Posts

SM.a.r.t Column: A New Path Ahead

January 19, 2025

January 19, 2025

The recent Palisades Fire is profoundly impacting the people of Los Angeles, displacing families, destroying property, and creating an enduring...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Adaptive Liveability

January 2, 2025

January 2, 2025

You know, sometimes you walk by a building and think, that place has some stories to tell. What if those...

SM.a.r.t Column: Happy Holidays

December 22, 2024

December 22, 2024

S.M.a.r.t. (Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow) is wishing you a wonderful holiday season. We hope you are surrounded...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Preserving Santa Monica

December 15, 2024

December 15, 2024

Since Giving Tuesday I’m sure you have been bombarded with appeals from countless organizations, local, national, or even international that...

SM.a.r.t Column: Climbing The Vertical Learning Curve

December 8, 2024

December 8, 2024

The city is facing a financial crisis, the roots of which stretch back decades but have been made worse by...

SM.a.r.t Column: It’s Time To Inspect Balconies

November 24, 2024

November 24, 2024

About nine years ago, a fifth-floor balcony in a Berkeley apartment building collapsed, tragically killing several students gathered on it...

S.M.a.r.t Column: Your City is Broke

November 18, 2024

November 18, 2024

On December 10, the new City council will be seated fresh from their dominant win in the recent elections. There...

SM.a.r.t Column: Moving Ahead to the Future

November 10, 2024

November 10, 2024

As we write this, the election results are still trickling in. We’ll leave the deep analysis to others, but the...

Opinion: Fact Check: Why Vote Yes on Measure QS

November 1, 2024

November 1, 2024

Despite living in a famously progressive region, Santa Monicans are not immune from the same political misinformation and disinformation that...

SM.a.r.t Column: Lack of Oversight and No Accountability

October 31, 2024

October 31, 2024

S.M.a.r.t. periodically invites guest columnists to write opinion articles on topics of particular interests to our readers. Below is an...

SM.a.r.t Column: “Help! I’ve Fallen, and I …!!”, Cries Santa Monica!

October 25, 2024

October 25, 2024

Maybe fallen, but slipping for sure from being a desirable beachfront community that served all equally, the local residents who...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Vote

October 13, 2024

October 13, 2024

In a polarized country or City every vote counts. Regardless of which side of any issue or candidate you support,...

SM.a.r.t Column: Fact-Checking Election-Season Windbaggery

October 6, 2024

October 6, 2024

Claim: The state is requiring Santa Monica to build 9,000 apartments.Answer: Partially true, partially false. Santa Monica has a pretty...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Public Safety and Traffic Enforcement Can Help Save Lives and Revitalize Santa Monica’s Economy

September 29, 2024

September 29, 2024

We wholeheartedly endorse the candidates below for Santa Monica City Council. Their leading campaign platform is for increased safety in...

SM.a.r.t Column: Crime in Santa Monica: A Growing Concern and the Need for Prioritizing Public Safety

September 22, 2024

September 22, 2024

By Michael Jolly Over the past six months, Santa Monica has experienced a concerning rise in crime, sparking heated discussions...