February 9, 2025 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Development, The Fairmont Miramar & The Huntley Hotel:

The Mirror would like to clarify details on the article published Oct. 18 “Poll Shows Residents Don’t Favor Dense, Tall Buildings” that contained a survey question relating to the Fairmont Miramar’s redevelopment project. The Mirror was unable to confirm who paid for the poll before time of press, but can now report that The Huntley Hotel contracted with Lake Research Partners to conduct a telephone poll of 404 Santa Monica voters between September 10 and 15.  

Lake Research Partners partner Dr. Bob Meadow confirmed there were more than three questions asked that were part of the poll (only three questions from the poll were publicly released).

“There were more questions asked that are proprietary, and for internal purposes of our client, and will not be released,” Meadow said. “It is quite common for only those questions that are of broad public interest to be released.”  

As the feud between the Fairmont Miramar and The Huntley continues regarding the Fairmont’s redevelopment plans, The Mirror will continue to report both sides.

Below are follow-up statements from both sides regarding the poll.

On behalf of the Fairmont Miramar, MSD Capital’s Alan Epstein:

After weeks of denying their involvement, we are not surprised that the Huntley Hotel has finally confessed that they were behind this one-sided, biased poll. If it was not biased in the way questions were asked, they would have released the entire survey and results. This is a typical PR ploy from the same consulting team that hid almost $100,000 in political contributions in the last city election.

Fortunately, Santa Monica residents are too sophisticated to be misled by the Huntley.

We have known about this survey for weeks. We know the deliberately misleading questions that were asked and we know that the Huntley’s paid telephone operators pushed people toward certain responses, without giving them honest options.   We know that they only released three questions from a 20 minute survey.

That being said, there is no place in America where you can ask the question “do you want more development” and get an answer any different than the Huntley got. However, when you ask Santa Monicans the following questions (and we have), you get a very different response:

• Would you like to see the Miramar Hotel redeveloped with fewer walls and fences and substantially more open space?

• Would you like to see the Miramar Hotel redeveloped so that it is taller and thinner, in essentially the same footprint that has existed since 1957, so that it does not impact ocean views?

• Would you like to see the Miramar Hotel redeveloped with a housing component that will include a substantial number of new affordable housing units?

• Would you like to see the Miramar Hotel redeveloped in a manner that will increase revenues to the City by more than $5 million a year?

As we have made clear in previous communications, the Huntley has a simple agenda:

1. Stop all competition.

2. Fight unions. The non-union Huntley hotel has refused to offer their workers fair wages and benefits that all of the union hotels in Santa Monica provide.

3. Stop the building of affordable housing on Second Street.

The Huntley will do anything to divert attention away from their own building, which is one of the tallest and most dense in the city. It is almost triple the density of the proposed Miramar Plan and has ZERO open space, and could never be built under the zoning that the Huntley now proposes. It will even mislead reporters to hide their own involvement.

When people see misinformation about the Miramar Plan, they should consider who is secretly bankrolling it.  We ask only that Santa Monicans judge the Miramar Plan on its merits.

On behalf of the Huntley Hotel, Sugerman Communications Group’s Heather Herndon:

The Huntley Hotel contracted with Lake Research Partners to conduct a telephone poll of 404 Santa Monica voters between September 10 and 15.  Lake Research Partners is a nationally renowned public opinion firm with clients that include some of the largest and most well-respected institutions in the country. These include UCLA, The Gates Foundation, AFL-CIO, the National League of Cities, the American Cancer Society, Human Rights Campaign, as well as scores of political candidates from around the country. You should check the website to learn more about Lake Research at www.lakeresearch.com.

Dr. Bob Meadow, Partner at Lake Research, oversaw the poll. Formerly a professor at USC among other schools, he has over 25 years of experience and is considered one of the top Democratic pollsters in the country.

Lake Research used professional telephone interviewers to ask a range of questions, using well-established survey methodology. The results, with a +/- 4.9% margin of error, show clearly that:

• Fifty-two percent of voters favor less development while only 15 percent favor more.

• Sixty-nine percent opposed changing the height and density requirements to allow more high-rise and higher density buildings in Santa Monica, with only 26 percent favoring changing the height and density requirements.

• Fifty-seven percent of voters oppose the Miramar’s expansion plans.

As Dr. Meadow’s noted in his response, “… There were more questions asked that are proprietary, and for internal purposes of our client, and will not be released. It is quite common for only those questions that are of broad public interest to be released.”  

In fact, for the reason that Dr. Meadow notes, it is rare for an entire poll to be released publicly.   

In short, this poll was conducted by nationally renowned experts using well-established survey methodology with statistically valid results.

Disliking a poll’s outcome is not a valid reason to “discredit the poll itself.”

in Opinion
<>Related Posts

SM.a.r.t Column: California’s Fire Safety Evolution: Meeting Modern Wildfire Challenges

February 2, 2025

February 2, 2025

The devastating fires that struck Los Angeles in January 2025 echo a pattern of increasingly destructive wildfires reshaping California’s approach...

SM.a.r.t Column: Peril, Prevention, and the Path Forward

January 26, 2025

January 26, 2025

The recent Palisades and Altadena fires brought Los Angeles’ inherent contradictions into sharp focus as residents fled their homes in...

SM.a.r.t Column: A New Path Ahead

January 19, 2025

January 19, 2025

The recent Palisades Fire is profoundly impacting the people of Los Angeles, displacing families, destroying property, and creating an enduring...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Adaptive Liveability

January 2, 2025

January 2, 2025

You know, sometimes you walk by a building and think, that place has some stories to tell. What if those...

SM.a.r.t Column: Happy Holidays

December 22, 2024

December 22, 2024

S.M.a.r.t. (Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow) is wishing you a wonderful holiday season. We hope you are surrounded...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Preserving Santa Monica

December 15, 2024

December 15, 2024

Since Giving Tuesday I’m sure you have been bombarded with appeals from countless organizations, local, national, or even international that...

SM.a.r.t Column: Climbing The Vertical Learning Curve

December 8, 2024

December 8, 2024

The city is facing a financial crisis, the roots of which stretch back decades but have been made worse by...

SM.a.r.t Column: It’s Time To Inspect Balconies

November 24, 2024

November 24, 2024

About nine years ago, a fifth-floor balcony in a Berkeley apartment building collapsed, tragically killing several students gathered on it...

S.M.a.r.t Column: Your City is Broke

November 18, 2024

November 18, 2024

On December 10, the new City council will be seated fresh from their dominant win in the recent elections. There...

SM.a.r.t Column: Moving Ahead to the Future

November 10, 2024

November 10, 2024

As we write this, the election results are still trickling in. We’ll leave the deep analysis to others, but the...

Opinion: Fact Check: Why Vote Yes on Measure QS

November 1, 2024

November 1, 2024

Despite living in a famously progressive region, Santa Monicans are not immune from the same political misinformation and disinformation that...

SM.a.r.t Column: Lack of Oversight and No Accountability

October 31, 2024

October 31, 2024

S.M.a.r.t. periodically invites guest columnists to write opinion articles on topics of particular interests to our readers. Below is an...

SM.a.r.t Column: “Help! I’ve Fallen, and I …!!”, Cries Santa Monica!

October 25, 2024

October 25, 2024

Maybe fallen, but slipping for sure from being a desirable beachfront community that served all equally, the local residents who...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Vote

October 13, 2024

October 13, 2024

In a polarized country or City every vote counts. Regardless of which side of any issue or candidate you support,...

SM.a.r.t Column: Fact-Checking Election-Season Windbaggery

October 6, 2024

October 6, 2024

Claim: The state is requiring Santa Monica to build 9,000 apartments.Answer: Partially true, partially false. Santa Monica has a pretty...