May 27, 2022 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Nativity (Scenes) Story Is An Annual Favorite:

Long time Santa Monica residents have their holiday favorites old and new. For many, there’s making a visit to the ice rink that sets-up downtown for the holidays at the corner of 5th and Arizona. There are decorations displayed and music to announce them at the Promenade each year. Neighbors and tourists alike enjoy the holiday lights down on Main Street. But for me, nothing quite brings on that holiday glow like an update on the gypsy travels of the Santa Monica Nativity Scenes.

Ironic, perhaps, that a collection of mannequins depicting the journey of Mary and Joseph has itself become nomadic.

From the website The Lookout dated Dec. 12: “Hoping to carry on a 60-year tradition, Santa Monica’s Mt. Olive Lutheran Church has agreed to host a dozen life-sized figures representing the Christmas story on its property starting Sunday. The Church’s front lawn will be the second new home for the displays since the City prohibited groups from displaying them in Palisades Park – their home for more than five decades – in June 2012 after several atheist groups protested the practice.”

That particular account may be true as far as it goes. But my take is that the groups involving the atheists merely precipitated action on a struggle our city had been having for years, which was full knowledge that the “tradition” of the nativity scenes in a public city park defied separation of church and state. Yet the scenes themselves had been a regular holiday event for so long (60 years!) that shutting them out was akin to putting down the family dog. Moving the scenes to any other location than Palisades Park leaves some feeling as though the Statue of Liberty has been relocated to New Jersey. Hold it… turns out it is in New Jersey. Actually, New York and New Jersey share jurisdiction over the Statue of Liberty.

Which is something like the current status of the nativity scenes. Mt. Olive officials are hoping to become the permanent home of the scenes but after all the ruckus they’ve engendered the past few years, they seem to have taken on the permanent title “The Santa Monica Nativity Scenes.” Now it’s like they belong to all of us. So, as a citizen of Santa Monica, maybe I can assume a stake in discussing the movable holiday display. And the first item of business would be that term, “holiday.”

What’s really being wrangled over each year when we find ourselves in these “Keep the Christ in Christmas” arguments is how pliable our democratic and freedom-loving society will be in tolerating outright, plain as day religious celebrations.

Over many decades, culture has embraced Santa as a universal symbol at this time of year (albeit based on a saint), while Jesus’ place at the Christmas table seems fuzzy if you filter it through something like the number of “holiday” TV specials that actually mention Jesus or Christ by name. Yes, TV specials are created as a dimension of capitalism to provide shelving for commercials for “gift ideas.” But it’s still hours and hours of (admittedly Jesus-free) “holiday” television, and almost none devoted to Hanukkah. Or at other times of the year, Islam. Thus we end up back at some kind of special privilege for Christianity if we encourage the nativity scenes being returned to the Palisades public city park that belongs to all citizens. And because of that, they shouldn’t be there.

I’m delighted Mt. Olive Lutheran Church may become a new tradition as a location for the scenes. And just as I enjoy almost any kind of holiday yard decoration people might want to put up, often blending iconic Frosty the Snowman with a manger scene to create a kind of electricity-sucking every-world of Christmas, so do I recognize that the frankly clunky-looking Santa Monica Nativity Scenes are ultimately like my neighbor’s pantheon of lights: A means of celebration.

Let us hope that there was a miracle thousands of years ago, and that it might be one that in any way could teach us to live better with each other. Because that, fellow earthlings, would be something to celebrate; something that might bring us enough strength to end such awful and needless human-on-human activity as homicide sprees in elementary schools. But at the heart of our nation’s freedom of religion is respect. And you can’t have government, local or national, respect any one faith more than another without signaling that somehow that one lucky faith is the official national faith. It’s not, and our continuing effort to draw and then enforce those lines is also something worth celebrating.

in Opinion
Related Posts

​​Doubt Removed: Oil Refiners Gouging Us

May 23, 2022

May 23, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist There was some room for doubt back in February, when gasoline prices rose precipitously: Until the...

Is the Big Housing Crunch Mostly Fiction?

May 20, 2022

May 20, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist In some parts of California, there is definitely a housing crunch: small supplies of homes for...

Is Gelson’s Our Future? Bigger Is Not Better & Not Necessary! – Part 2

May 20, 2022

May 20, 2022

The dream of our beachfront city is about to become a nightmare! Just imagine a tsunami of these projects washing...

Column From Santa Monica Mayor Himmelrich: We Walk the Talk

May 12, 2022

May 12, 2022

By Sue Himmelrich, Santa Moncia Mayor  I like the SMa.r.t. architects. I often agree with them. But in allowing Mark...

Is Gelson’s Our Future? Bigger Is Not Better!

May 12, 2022

May 12, 2022

It’s appalling to see what’s happening in our city – projects recently built or about to be approved – in...

Renting Your Second Home

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

If you are among the many Americans who own a second home that you occasionally use as a vacation getaway,...

Column: Cities Fight to Maintain Distinctive Characters

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist Anyone who knows California well will realize that Palo Alto does not look much like nearby...

SMa.r.t. Column: Gelson’s, Boxed-In

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

This week we are re-visiting an article from 2018 regarding the Miramar project, by simply replacing the word “Miramar” with...

Column: Are You Talking Yourself Out of Saving for Retirement? Here’s How to Break the Habit

May 5, 2022

May 5, 2022

Saving for retirement can be an abstract concept. It’s something we all know we should do, but the farther away...

SMa.r.t. Column: Failure to Plan…

April 30, 2022

April 30, 2022

Over the last approximately two years your City has been busy trying to respond to new California laws that are...

Letter to Editor: Your “Standing Firm With Santa Monica” Initiative

April 25, 2022

April 25, 2022

The following is an open letter to Councilmember Sue Himmelrich from Santa Monica resident Arthur Jeon regarding a proposed transfer...

SMa.r.t. Column: Planning The Real Future

April 24, 2022

April 24, 2022

In the 1970s, renowned USC architecture professor Ralph Knowles developed a method for planning and designing cities that would dramatically...

SMa.r.t. Column: New City Financial Plan: The Resident Homeowner Bank

April 15, 2022

April 15, 2022

Part II: Who pays the proposed transfer tax and where does the money go? Last week, we introduced the proposed...

Column: NIMBYs Getting a Bad Rap

April 8, 2022

April 8, 2022

By Tom Elias Rarely has a major group of Californians suffered a less deserved rash of insults and attacks than...

SMa.r.t. Column: New City Financial Plan – The Resident Homeowner Bank

April 8, 2022

April 8, 2022

Part 1 of 2 In this two-part article, we will discuss both the proposed transfer tax ballot initiative and the...