June 27, 2022 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

429 Residents Sign E-Petition Opposing Hines Project: Letter To The Editor:

Editor’s Note: Below is a letter sent to the Santa Monica City Council regarding an E-Petition that wants to stop the Bergamot Transit Village Development Project.

Dear City Council members,

Residocracy is an all-volunteer based non-profit organization which represents the voice of our Community Network of Residents in local government.

Residocracy.org was launched on January 7, 2014 and to date there are already over five hundred members in our Santa Monica Community Network of Residents.

Residocracy is committed to a fundamental philosophy that the Resident is the number one stakeholder in any decision that is made by our elected representatives.

At issue in front of you, on the evening of January 28, 2014, is the approval or denial of proposed Development Agreement 10DEV-002.

An electronic petition (E-Petition) was posted on www.residocracy.org regarding this project (https://www.residocracy.org/E-P-BTV-001.php). In two and one half weeks, four hundred and twenty nine members of Our Community Network of Residents have signed this E-Petition to ask you not to approve this development agreement as it is against resident interests.

Our E-Petition is an informal means of allowing you as a City Council member to gauge how your constituents want you to represent their interests on particular issues that are in front of you for your consideration.

While signing an E-Petition, our Community Network of Residents are also asked if they would be willing to sign and circulate a referendum petition on the particular issue should the Council’s decision on that issue differ from resident interests.

Additionally, members of the Community Network of Residents also pledge a certain number of signatures that they are willing to gather as official circulators of a referendum petition section should a referendum be initiated by Residocracy.org.

Our Community Network of Residents have thus far pledged to gather over 4,000 signatures in support of a referendum if Agenda Item 7A is approved.

It is the official position of Residocracy.org that should proposed Development Agreement 10DEV-002 be approved there is a high likelihood that a referendum petition will be successful.

Based on the input received from our Community Network of Residents, indications are that the approval of the Bergamot Transit Village Development Project at this time would have a severe and negative impact on the quality of lives for most Santa Monica Residents.

Our Community Network of Residents have spoken clearly and loudly and Residocracy.org is prepared to circulate a referendum petition should the project be approved at this time.

Please find attached a copy of the E·Petition posted on www.Residocracy.org regarding the proposed development agreement for the Bergamot Transit Village Development Project together with the supporting electronic signatures of our Community Network of Residents who have signed it thus far.

Sincerely,

Armen Melkonians

Founder, Residocracy.org

in Opinion
Related Posts

SMa.r.t. Column: The Mansionization of Santa Monica

June 17, 2022

June 17, 2022

Editor’s note: This column originally appeared in print in 2016.  In the 1980s, Santa Monica’s single family zoning code was...

OP-Ed Response to DTSM Board Chair Barry Snell and Plea to City Council Regarding Safety Ambassadors and Ambassador Program

June 14, 2022

June 14, 2022

I am responding to the OP-ED (dated June 7, 2022, Santa Monica Mirror) by City-appointed DTSM Board Member and now...

SMa.r.t. Column: Wheeling Electrically

June 9, 2022

June 9, 2022

A recent weekend visit to Dana Point, on the Orange County coastline, revealed a curious scene: dozens, if not hundreds...

Population Loss: New Era or Pandemic Glitch?

June 3, 2022

June 3, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist The numbers suggest a major change is underway in California. It would take a Nostradamus to...

SMa.r.t. Column: The Sound of Silence Is Big & Tall

June 3, 2022

June 3, 2022

All too often these days we find ourselves wondering how we could have been so correct about so many planning...

OP-Ed: DTSM Chair Barry Snell on Safety Ambassadors

June 2, 2022

June 2, 2022

By Barry Snell Chair, Downtown Santa Monica, Inc. Board of Directors  The Downtown Santa Monica, Inc. (DTSM) Board of Directors...

Affordable Spaces for Small Business

May 27, 2022

May 27, 2022

Los Angeles County recently proposed a program providing financial incentives for certain “Legacy” family businesses in their original historical location....

​​Doubt Removed: Oil Refiners Gouging Us

May 23, 2022

May 23, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist There was some room for doubt back in February, when gasoline prices rose precipitously: Until the...

Is the Big Housing Crunch Mostly Fiction?

May 20, 2022

May 20, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist In some parts of California, there is definitely a housing crunch: small supplies of homes for...

Is Gelson’s Our Future? Bigger Is Not Better & Not Necessary! – Part 2

May 20, 2022

May 20, 2022

The dream of our beachfront city is about to become a nightmare! Just imagine a tsunami of these projects washing...

Column From Santa Monica Mayor Himmelrich: We Walk the Talk

May 12, 2022

May 12, 2022

By Sue Himmelrich, Santa Moncia Mayor  I like the SMa.r.t. architects. I often agree with them. But in allowing Mark...

Is Gelson’s Our Future? Bigger Is Not Better!

May 12, 2022

May 12, 2022

It’s appalling to see what’s happening in our city – projects recently built or about to be approved – in...

Renting Your Second Home

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

If you are among the many Americans who own a second home that you occasionally use as a vacation getaway,...

Column: Cities Fight to Maintain Distinctive Characters

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist Anyone who knows California well will realize that Palo Alto does not look much like nearby...

SMa.r.t. Column: Gelson’s, Boxed-In

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

This week we are re-visiting an article from 2018 regarding the Miramar project, by simply replacing the word “Miramar” with...