May 29, 2022 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

What Say You? Of Cormorants & Santa Monica City Council Candidates:

Santa Monica summer at the beach: Surfers, children splashing in the waves, junior lifeguards in training, long distance ocean swimmers in the surf, and runners on the beach paths.

Beach walks at sunrise and sunset. Dolphin sightings, sandpipers poking in the sand for their breakfast, pelicans flying low across the water and then diving for fish, and the choreographed dance of the Black Cormorant.

The glory of summer in Santa Monica makes it even harder to get one’s mind around the fact that the local election season is now open.

The early start is an indicator of the controversies swirling around town. Key issues will be the scale and urban character of new development and the existing and continuing increase in traffic.

Look to the defeat of the Hines Project. Add to that the ongoing opposition to the height and scale and character of the proposed development at the Fairmont Miramar Hotel and to other developments in the application queue. Development is the main argument.

The Hines defeat is particularly telling. A major new community organization in town, Residocracy.org, flexed considerable muscle and brought about the defeat of the Hines project. SMCLC (Santa Monica Coalition for a Livable City) had previously opposed the Hines project and was ready with a lawsuit.

In a show of unanimity all the Santa Monica neighborhood organizations, OPA, NOMA, PNA, MidCity Neighbors, NE Neighbors, Wilmont, and Friends of Sunset Park joined together in asking the City Council to reject the Hines project.

The organization that brought Rent Control to Santa Monica in the late 1970’s SMRR (Santa Monicans for Renters Rights) publicly opposed the Hines project and key SMRR leaders spoke against the project at the Council hearing.

There was a split in the SMRR-endorsed Council Members. On the SMRR website, Sonya Fox Sultan, SMRR Steering Committee, wrote of the SMRR opposition to the Hines project, concluding with “SMRR endorsed Council members Kevin McKeown, Tony Vasquez, and Ted Winterer voted NO.” She did not write that SMRR endorsed Council Members Pam O’Connor, Gleam Davis, and Terry O’Day voted YES.

Is the split in SMRR endorsed Council Members an indicator of conflict at the upcoming Aug. 3, 2014 SMRR Convention? Does the division of SMRR votes on the Council reflect a division within SMRR? How will it effect SMRR endorsements? What does it mean for the election and the next Council?

Fifteen candidates have pulled papers to begin the process of getting the necessary 100 Santa Monica voter signatures on a candidate petition to qualify for the ballot. The candidates are: currently serving Council Members Kevin McKeown and Pam O’Connor and former Council Member Michael Feinstein; Planning Commissioners Sue Himmelrich, Jennifer Kennedy, Richard McKinnon and former Planning Commissioner Frank Gruber; Recreation and Parks Commissioner Phil Brock; community activist Jerry Rubin; and community members Nick Boles, Terence Later, Jon Mann, Ken Robin, Whitney Scott Bain, and Jessica Miller. Still unknown is whether or not Council Member Bob Holbrook, whose term is up, will run again.

Editor’s Note: Only campaign links provided from the City Clerk’s are listed above.

Election day, Nov. 4, is almost four months away but campaigning is full on.

Current Mayor Pam O’Connor, a five-time SMRR-endorsed candidate is not expected to receive another SMRR endorsement nor the campaign and financial support that goes with the SMRR endorsement.

O’Connor is expected to run a vigorous campaign. Early endorsements include LA County Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky and LA City Council Member Mike Bonin. O’Connor has worked with both of them on regional transportation issues and bringing the Expo Line to Santa Monica. Other early endorsements come from State Assembly Member Richard Bloom and Santa Monica Council Members Gleam Davis, Terry O’Day, and Bob Holbrook.

The community organization SMCLC (Santa Monica Coalition for a Livable City) moved quickly to endorse Kevin McKeown, Sue Himmelrich, and Richard McKinnon, saying: “Santa Monica faces a historic election…when residents will have a chance to fundamentally change the current council, from one where the majority largely rubber stamps a steady onslaught of high-density, traffic-clogging overdevelopment – to one that will act for residents, not developers. The scale, character, and livability of our City is at stake.”

NOMA Chair Danilo Bach and Landmarks Commissioner Margaret Bach are also supporting Richard McKinnon and opened their home this past week for a neighborhood ‘meet and greet.’ McKinnon spoke about good governance, development issues, social services, sustainability, the airport, and transportation.

He said, “Santa Monica is a great city. However the community is fractured at the moment and residents have lost trust in their elected officials. The whole world wants to come to Santa Monica, to our low-scale city of beaches and parks and sunlight and trees. I understand that there will be development but I want it to be sympathetic to the City.”

Sue Himmelrich invited supporters to her house over the weekend for speeches and tacos from a taco truck. (An ink stamp on the back of your hand from the campaign was what you showed at the taco truck). Kevin McKeown and Tony Vazquez, current SMRR Council Members, and Denny Zane, an early SMRR leader and former Council Member, were there to support Himmelrich. Zane told the group of about 70 people, “We need to be allies for a community that has a human scale and we do not need to be a world class destination, we need to be a city of residents.”

Himmelrich, an attorney with the Western Center on Law and Poverty, promised “a transparent Santa Monica government.” She called the Hines project “just wrong” and said that she had given both money and legal advice to support the referendum that defeated the project. “People are above corporations and our City is the right scale now and we need to keep it that way.”

Michael Feinstein’s community meet and greet this week was at the destination surf shop, Zuma Jay’s on Main Street. Former Los Angeles City Council Member Bill Rosendahl introduced Feinstein saying, “He has a passion for the issues which are important to all of us. The bay, the ocean, shutting down the airport, and making good development decisions.”

Feinstein spoke about his work with the Green Party, his concerns about climate change, closing the airport, capping the freeway, building new parks throughout the city, creating a public solar utility, protecting, and expanding Bergamot.

Feinstein said, “I see the big picture. I talk with everyone. I think government should be open. And I believe anything is possible.”

Frank Gruber, former Planning Commissioner, entertainment attorney, writer, and blogger will hold his first campaign event today, July 25.

Gruber said, “I’m running to continue the tradition of more than 30 years of progressive government in Santa Monica.”

Phil Brock, Recreation and Parks Commissioner and Chair, talks about Santa Monica and why he is running.

“I stayed in the city I was born in,” Brock said. “It’s the openness of Santa Monica that we like. It’s that magical combination of great schools, superb green space, the ocean, the cool breezes and the notion that a city could be more humane, more livable and more unique….”

Even at this early date there are front-runners, contenders, and candidates the public hasn’t yet met. All candidates are invited to participate at the City Council Candidates Forum held by Residocracy.org and the City Neighborhood Groups. The forum, which is free and open to the public, will be held this Monday, July 28, at the Santa Monica Main Library’s Martin Luther King Auditorium. Doors open at 6 pm; event from 6:30-9 pm.

I start my day with an early morning beach walk. With the wonderful feeling of my feet in the sand and in the water. As I walk I think about how we elect leaders and the money we spend. I wonder why campaigns are volatile and issues urgent. Then I remember that politics care even if we don’t want to be bothered. The decisions made by our elected leaders impact the quality of each Santa Monican and that it is only by caring about politics that we take care of ourselves and of future generations of Santa Monicans.

What Say You?

in Opinion
Related Posts

Affordable Spaces for Small Business

May 27, 2022

May 27, 2022

Los Angeles County recently proposed a program providing financial incentives for certain “Legacy” family businesses in their original historical location....

​​Doubt Removed: Oil Refiners Gouging Us

May 23, 2022

May 23, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist There was some room for doubt back in February, when gasoline prices rose precipitously: Until the...

Is the Big Housing Crunch Mostly Fiction?

May 20, 2022

May 20, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist In some parts of California, there is definitely a housing crunch: small supplies of homes for...

Is Gelson’s Our Future? Bigger Is Not Better & Not Necessary! – Part 2

May 20, 2022

May 20, 2022

The dream of our beachfront city is about to become a nightmare! Just imagine a tsunami of these projects washing...

Column From Santa Monica Mayor Himmelrich: We Walk the Talk

May 12, 2022

May 12, 2022

By Sue Himmelrich, Santa Moncia Mayor  I like the SMa.r.t. architects. I often agree with them. But in allowing Mark...

Is Gelson’s Our Future? Bigger Is Not Better!

May 12, 2022

May 12, 2022

It’s appalling to see what’s happening in our city – projects recently built or about to be approved – in...

Renting Your Second Home

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

If you are among the many Americans who own a second home that you occasionally use as a vacation getaway,...

Column: Cities Fight to Maintain Distinctive Characters

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist Anyone who knows California well will realize that Palo Alto does not look much like nearby...

SMa.r.t. Column: Gelson’s, Boxed-In

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

This week we are re-visiting an article from 2018 regarding the Miramar project, by simply replacing the word “Miramar” with...

Column: Are You Talking Yourself Out of Saving for Retirement? Here’s How to Break the Habit

May 5, 2022

May 5, 2022

Saving for retirement can be an abstract concept. It’s something we all know we should do, but the farther away...

SMa.r.t. Column: Failure to Plan…

April 30, 2022

April 30, 2022

Over the last approximately two years your City has been busy trying to respond to new California laws that are...

Letter to Editor: Your “Standing Firm With Santa Monica” Initiative

April 25, 2022

April 25, 2022

The following is an open letter to Councilmember Sue Himmelrich from Santa Monica resident Arthur Jeon regarding a proposed transfer...

SMa.r.t. Column: Planning The Real Future

April 24, 2022

April 24, 2022

In the 1970s, renowned USC architecture professor Ralph Knowles developed a method for planning and designing cities that would dramatically...

SMa.r.t. Column: New City Financial Plan: The Resident Homeowner Bank

April 15, 2022

April 15, 2022

Part II: Who pays the proposed transfer tax and where does the money go? Last week, we introduced the proposed...

Column: NIMBYs Getting a Bad Rap

April 8, 2022

April 8, 2022

By Tom Elias Rarely has a major group of Californians suffered a less deserved rash of insults and attacks than...