February 28, 2024 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Editor To The Letter: The Bergamot Arts Complex – Not Too Late To Get It Right:

Dear Editor,

The train is coming! In less than two years, the Expo Line will arrive in Santa Monica. While the Expo Station will be ready on time, the adjacent Bergamot Arts Complex likely will not.

This delay, however, should not give the City reason to rush into a project that lacks vision and contains many unresolved issues. The City’s initial description of the concept for potential developers stated:

“The concept emphasizes retaining the concentration of art galleries and other art uses, providing space for a museum, creating revenue-producing and visitor-serving uses, including a hotel and restaurants/bars, and delivering infrastructure improvements to compliment the arts center and new Expo station.”

The City is currently reviewing proposals from three developers, and could make their selection shortly. It is likely going to be much longer before the Bergamot Arts Complex welcomes its first visitors. There is still time to question if the City’s concept will result in a project that both inspires and meets the needs of the community. It is already too late to be ready on time, but with a price tag of $92,000,000, let’s at least make sure that we get it right.

Is the City’s current concept for the site correct? No.

The biggest problem with the City’s program is that it does not address the “elephant in the room” – parking. The current tenants believe that the complex needs at least 1,000 spaces (some say 1,200).

Although all three schemes may achieve the City’s targets for parking, their target is likely 50 percent short of what is needed to serve the Arts Center and Expo Station.

One solution that has been proposed is to construct a new parking structure on the City Yards adjacent to Bergamot. The City’s reticence towards this solution is understandable since it would require relocating a portion of the City Yards and result in further delays.

Ultimately, they may have no other choice. Failure to provide adequate parking will ensure the failure of the Arts Center.

Secondly, the premise that the project should be designed around the current galleries is putting the cart before the horse. The overall vision for the new Bergamot Arts Complex should come first not last. Once this vision is established, the current galleries can decide if they share in the new overall vision for the Center and, if not, relocate.

Private, for-profit galleries, whose interests may conflict with the interests of the City’s residents, should not dictate the design of this public amenity. Currently, the galleries want to remain but will only do so if certain conditions are met: 1) no rent increase, 2) long term leases, 3) the exclusion of artist’s studios and 4) their ability to continue business operations uninterrupted during construction.

While reasonable, these demands will complicate the creation of a unified Arts Complex.

For example, the inclusion of uses unrelated to the arts may be necessary to keep the galleries’ rents at current levels. Two of the commercial uses that have been proposed are: 1) 100-room hotel 6-7 stories high, and 2) “creative office space” of 25K to 60K SF.

Some residents have concerns that these uses will tilt the scale towards a center that is more oriented towards Income than the Arts. The term “Creative Office Space” more often refers to their ability to house more employees than to the work they are doing.

SMa.r.t. believes it is imperative that any development is deed-restricted to ensure that the developer cannot waver from their promise to prioritize “arts and cultural” uses and keep the arts center from turning into a commercial center. The focus of the complex should remain on the Arts, in all its various forms, rather than retail in its various disguises.

SMa.r.t. believes that the Bergamot Arts Center should be one that is diverse, includes a wide spectrum of the arts, has broad appeal and, ideally, is self-sustaining. We hope it will not require a 6-story hotel or creative office space to support itself. It should be a low-rise center that focuses on providing artistic and cultural activities that appeal to all ages and interests in the community. It should include amphitheaters, stages and other venues for performances, music and theater arts.

It should be a day and night venue that takes advantage of its proximity to the new Bergamot Expo Line. It should enhance what is there, not destroy it. It should be a low-rise arts village with an industrial character consistent with its historical roots.

It should not preclude studio lofts where lesser-known artists could work, teach and show their work as well as art schools with classes for all age and skill levels. In short, an Arts center that is unified and synergistic where each use-element supports and energizes the others. It should not be one that is bifurcated with an area for the galleries and unrelated commercial activities to support them.

The developers will follow the City’s lead. The City needs to accept this mantel of leadership and rethink their program. It should be a vision for the future unfettered by the past. It should prioritize the Arts not commerce. Bergamot should be an Arts complex focused on entertainment, education and the promotion of the arts in all its forms. It could introduce residents of all ages to theater, music, painting, performance, etc. Bergamot is a unique opportunity to celebrate Santa Monica’s connection to arts and culture at a prominent gateway to our City. Let’s take a little more time to make sure we get it right.

Please share your vision with the City Council for this precious City resource so that it can serve and inspire all Santa Monica residents for years to come.

Thane Roberts AIA for:

SMa.r.t. (Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow) Ron Goldman FAIA, Mario Fonda-Bonardi AIA, Bob Taylor AIA, Dan Jansenson Architect, Sam Tolkin Architect, Thane Roberts AIA, Armen Melkonians Civil & Environmental Engineer, Phil Brock Chair, Recreation & Parks Commission. SMa.r.t. is a group of Santa Monica Architects concerned about the city’s future. For previous articles, see santamonicaarch.wordpress.com/writings.

in Opinion
Related Posts

S.M.a.r.t Column: Gelson’s Looms Large

February 22, 2024

February 22, 2024

Our guest column this week is by SMCLC (the Santa Monica Coalition for a Livable City). SMCLC is a well-established...

S.M.a.r.t Column: Top Toady Town

February 18, 2024

February 18, 2024

Throughout history, from the ancient Romans and Assyrians to Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine, siege warfare has served as an...

S.M.a.r.t Column: The Sunset of Home Ownership

February 11, 2024

February 11, 2024

We are watching the sunset of our historical and cultural American dream of home ownership as we now are crossing...

SMa.r.t. Column: B(U)Y RIGHT

February 4, 2024

February 4, 2024

“By Right” state housing laws that give developers, in certain projects, the ability to ignore codes ‘by right.’ Well, that...

S.M.a.r.t  Column: Serf City

January 28, 2024

January 28, 2024

Homelessness is a problem in California, and nowhere is this more evident than in our fair city, where the unhoused...

S.M.a.r.t  Column: Bond Fatigue

January 22, 2024

January 22, 2024

Last week’s SMart article,  described two critical problems faced by our Santa Monica Malibu Unified School District (SMMUSD): the declining...

S.M.a.r.t Column: Peace on Earth

December 27, 2023

December 27, 2023

We are all, by now, saturated with jingles, holiday cards, “ho ho ho’s,” countless commercial advertisements, and exhortations to feel...

S.M.a.r.t Column: On the Clock with Mayor Brock

December 17, 2023

December 17, 2023

I became Santa Monica’s Mayor on Tuesday, December 12, 2023, following a simple “switch of the chairs” transition with outgoing...

S.M.a.r.t Column: SANTA MONICA CITY COUNCIL 2024

December 10, 2023

December 10, 2023

Position:Seeking Santa Monica City Council Candidate(s) Introduction:Exciting opportunity for the right candidate(s) to work with like-minded Council members committed to...

S.M.a.r.t Column: ARB (NOT Ready to Build!)

December 3, 2023

December 3, 2023

Santa Monica City’s Architectural Review Board (ARB), established in 1974, acts “…to preserve existing areas of natural beauty, cultural importance...

SMa.r.t. Column: We are thankful for….

November 27, 2023

November 27, 2023

SMa.r.t. would like to wish you all a great Thanksgiving with friends and family and also to thank its readers...

S.M.a.r.t Column: Make the City New Again

November 19, 2023

November 19, 2023

When the COVID crisis struck, it cut the city’s income in half, demolishing many businesses and causing widespread layoffs and...

S.M.a.r.t Column: Four Futures

October 29, 2023

October 29, 2023

As well described by Paul Krugman, all cities have a core competency: things they do well or better regionally or...

SMa.r.t column: Beautiful Quartz Countertops Are Hurting Workers and Should Be Banned

October 9, 2023

October 9, 2023

Quartz countertops are super popular because they’re tough and can handle stains, scratches, and heat. But there’s a big problem:...

S.M.a.r.t Column: Architect’s Son Reflects On Civic Auditorium

October 2, 2023

October 2, 2023

Welton (David) Becket (1902-1969), pictured above, backed by a picture of our Civic Auditorium, was the designer of that famed...