October 12, 2024 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Editor To The Letter: The Bergamot Arts Complex – Not Too Late To Get It Right:

Dear Editor,

The train is coming! In less than two years, the Expo Line will arrive in Santa Monica. While the Expo Station will be ready on time, the adjacent Bergamot Arts Complex likely will not.

This delay, however, should not give the City reason to rush into a project that lacks vision and contains many unresolved issues. The City’s initial description of the concept for potential developers stated:

“The concept emphasizes retaining the concentration of art galleries and other art uses, providing space for a museum, creating revenue-producing and visitor-serving uses, including a hotel and restaurants/bars, and delivering infrastructure improvements to compliment the arts center and new Expo station.”

The City is currently reviewing proposals from three developers, and could make their selection shortly. It is likely going to be much longer before the Bergamot Arts Complex welcomes its first visitors. There is still time to question if the City’s concept will result in a project that both inspires and meets the needs of the community. It is already too late to be ready on time, but with a price tag of $92,000,000, let’s at least make sure that we get it right.

Is the City’s current concept for the site correct? No.

The biggest problem with the City’s program is that it does not address the “elephant in the room” – parking. The current tenants believe that the complex needs at least 1,000 spaces (some say 1,200).

Although all three schemes may achieve the City’s targets for parking, their target is likely 50 percent short of what is needed to serve the Arts Center and Expo Station.

One solution that has been proposed is to construct a new parking structure on the City Yards adjacent to Bergamot. The City’s reticence towards this solution is understandable since it would require relocating a portion of the City Yards and result in further delays.

Ultimately, they may have no other choice. Failure to provide adequate parking will ensure the failure of the Arts Center.

Secondly, the premise that the project should be designed around the current galleries is putting the cart before the horse. The overall vision for the new Bergamot Arts Complex should come first not last. Once this vision is established, the current galleries can decide if they share in the new overall vision for the Center and, if not, relocate.

Private, for-profit galleries, whose interests may conflict with the interests of the City’s residents, should not dictate the design of this public amenity. Currently, the galleries want to remain but will only do so if certain conditions are met: 1) no rent increase, 2) long term leases, 3) the exclusion of artist’s studios and 4) their ability to continue business operations uninterrupted during construction.

While reasonable, these demands will complicate the creation of a unified Arts Complex.

For example, the inclusion of uses unrelated to the arts may be necessary to keep the galleries’ rents at current levels. Two of the commercial uses that have been proposed are: 1) 100-room hotel 6-7 stories high, and 2) “creative office space” of 25K to 60K SF.

Some residents have concerns that these uses will tilt the scale towards a center that is more oriented towards Income than the Arts. The term “Creative Office Space” more often refers to their ability to house more employees than to the work they are doing.

SMa.r.t. believes it is imperative that any development is deed-restricted to ensure that the developer cannot waver from their promise to prioritize “arts and cultural” uses and keep the arts center from turning into a commercial center. The focus of the complex should remain on the Arts, in all its various forms, rather than retail in its various disguises.

SMa.r.t. believes that the Bergamot Arts Center should be one that is diverse, includes a wide spectrum of the arts, has broad appeal and, ideally, is self-sustaining. We hope it will not require a 6-story hotel or creative office space to support itself. It should be a low-rise center that focuses on providing artistic and cultural activities that appeal to all ages and interests in the community. It should include amphitheaters, stages and other venues for performances, music and theater arts.

It should be a day and night venue that takes advantage of its proximity to the new Bergamot Expo Line. It should enhance what is there, not destroy it. It should be a low-rise arts village with an industrial character consistent with its historical roots.

It should not preclude studio lofts where lesser-known artists could work, teach and show their work as well as art schools with classes for all age and skill levels. In short, an Arts center that is unified and synergistic where each use-element supports and energizes the others. It should not be one that is bifurcated with an area for the galleries and unrelated commercial activities to support them.

The developers will follow the City’s lead. The City needs to accept this mantel of leadership and rethink their program. It should be a vision for the future unfettered by the past. It should prioritize the Arts not commerce. Bergamot should be an Arts complex focused on entertainment, education and the promotion of the arts in all its forms. It could introduce residents of all ages to theater, music, painting, performance, etc. Bergamot is a unique opportunity to celebrate Santa Monica’s connection to arts and culture at a prominent gateway to our City. Let’s take a little more time to make sure we get it right.

Please share your vision with the City Council for this precious City resource so that it can serve and inspire all Santa Monica residents for years to come.

Thane Roberts AIA for:

SMa.r.t. (Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow) Ron Goldman FAIA, Mario Fonda-Bonardi AIA, Bob Taylor AIA, Dan Jansenson Architect, Sam Tolkin Architect, Thane Roberts AIA, Armen Melkonians Civil & Environmental Engineer, Phil Brock Chair, Recreation & Parks Commission. SMa.r.t. is a group of Santa Monica Architects concerned about the city’s future. For previous articles, see santamonicaarch.wordpress.com/writings.

in Opinion
Related Posts

SM.a.r.t Column: Fact-Checking Election-Season Windbaggery

October 6, 2024

October 6, 2024

Claim: The state is requiring Santa Monica to build 9,000 apartments.Answer: Partially true, partially false. Santa Monica has a pretty...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Public Safety and Traffic Enforcement Can Help Save Lives and Revitalize Santa Monica’s Economy

September 29, 2024

September 29, 2024

We wholeheartedly endorse the candidates below for Santa Monica City Council. Their leading campaign platform is for increased safety in...

SM.a.r.t Column: Crime in Santa Monica: A Growing Concern and the Need for Prioritizing Public Safety

September 22, 2024

September 22, 2024

By Michael Jolly Over the past six months, Santa Monica has experienced a concerning rise in crime, sparking heated discussions...

SM.a.r.t Column: Ten New Commandments

September 15, 2024

September 15, 2024

Starting last week,  the elementary school students of Louisiana will all face mandatory postings of the biblical Ten Commandments in...

SM.a.r.t Column: Santa Monica’s Next City Council

September 8, 2024

September 8, 2024

In the next general election, this November 5th, Santa Monica residents will be asked to vote their choices among an...

SM.a.r.t Column: Part II: The Affordability Crisis: Unmasking California’s RHNA Process and Its Role in Gentrification

September 2, 2024

September 2, 2024

Affordability: An Income and Available Asset Gap Issue, Not a Supply Issue (Last week’s article revealed how state mandates became...

SM.a.r.t Column: Part 1: The Affordability Crisis: Unmasking California’s RHNA Process and Its Role in Gentrification

August 26, 2024

August 26, 2024

In the world of economic policy, good intentions often pave the way to unintended consequences. Nowhere is this more evident...

SM.a.r.t Column: They Want to Build a Wall

August 18, 2024

August 18, 2024

Every once in a while, a topic arises that we had previously written about but doesn’t seem to go away....

SM.a.r.t Column: Sharks vs. Batteries – Part 5 of 5

August 11, 2024

August 11, 2024

This is the last SMart article in an expanding  5 part series about our City’s power, water, and food prospects....

SM.a.r.t Column: Your Home’s First Battery Is in Your Car

August 4, 2024

August 4, 2024

This is the fourth in a series of SM.a.r.t articles about food, water, and energy issues in Santa Monica. You...

SM.a.r.t Column: Food Water and Energy Part 3 of 4

July 28, 2024

July 28, 2024

Our previous two S.M.a,r,t, articles talked about the seismic risks to the City from getting its three survival essentials: food,...

Food, Water, and Energy Part 2 of 4

July 21, 2024

July 21, 2024

Last week’s S.M.a,r,t, article (https://smmirror.com/2024/07/sm-a-r-t-column-food-water-and-energy-part-1-of-3/) talked about the seismic risks to the City from getting its three survival essentials, food,...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Food Water and Energy Part 1 of 3

July 14, 2024

July 14, 2024

Civilization, as we know it, requires many things, but the most critical and fundamental is an uninterrupted supply of three...

Letter to the Editor: Criticizing Israeli Policy Is Not Antisemitic

July 10, 2024

July 10, 2024

In the past several months, we’ve seen increasing protests against Israel’s actions in Gaza. We have also seen these protests...

SMA.R.T. WISHES ALL A VERY HAPPY 4TH OF JULY WEEK

July 7, 2024

July 7, 2024

We trust you are enjoying this holiday in celebration of Independence. Independence to be embraced, personally and civically, thru active...