June 29, 2022 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Letter To The Editor: Santa Monica Is For Everyone:

Dear Editor,

Santa Monica always has been in the forefront of protecting and producing affordable homes. When Santa Monica passed its landmark rent control law on April 10, 1979, we took a bold step to preserve affordable housing for seniors, families and others. In 1990, when we passed Measure R, we codified our commitment by mandating that 30 percent of all new housing be affordable.

Santa Monicans embraced these laws because they understand that affordable housing is the key to preserving the diversity and character that makes Santa Monica so special. We know that having affordable places to live allows seniors to age in place with dignity, makes it possible for working families to live near their jobs and allows the children of our city to return to the community in which they grew up.

In Santa Monica, we don’t just give lip service to affordable housing; we build it. Why? Because housing is a basic right and the well­ documented housing supply crisis we face in our city, our region and our state threatens the ability of current residents to stay in their homes and our overall neighborhood stability.

Our failure to build new homes affects real people: The twenty­something who can’t move back to her childhood neighborhood after college because no new homes have been built there for a decade. The working mom who loses hours that she could be spending with her children to her commute because her salary won’t cover the rent for an apartment near her job in Santa Monica. The elderly widower who wants to move from his larger ­­ and now mostly empty ­­ home to a smaller apartment near his children and grandchildren. The young couple who needs a home with a third bedroom so their children have quiet space for homework. The single dad working as a dishwasher in a Downtown Santa Monica restaurant who wants his kids to have a better shot in life than he did. We have a real challenge ahead of us. Recently, the California Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) ­­ a nonpartisan group charged with analyzing the state’s annual budget and major policy issue documented the extent of the housing supply crisis and pointed out that, in Los Angeles County alone, we have fallen about one million homes behind what we need.

“Rising home prices and rents are a signal that more households would like to live in an area than there is housing to accommodate them. Housing developers typically respond to this excess demand by building additional housing. This does not appear to be true, however, in California’s coastal metros,” the report notes.

In Santa Monica, since 1960, we have seen our population increase by less than 10,000 people. We, like other coastal communities, are growing very slowly. Because of that, rents and home prices along California’s coast are unattainable for many of the people who would like to live here.

“The greatest need for additional housing is in California’s coastal urban areas,” the LAO report says.

While the report asks the state legislature to take steps to assure new homes get built in these areas, we can start doing our part to solve the problem.

Santa Monica’s Land Use and Circulation Element (LUCE), adopted unanimously in 2010 as the guiding vision for our community’s future, anticipates that we will add 4,955 new homes by 2030.

It is a modest goal, but it’s part of a cooperative effort with other cities in the region to alleviate our dire shortage of homes. If we resist even this modest amount of growth, we only will exacerbate the problem and lose even more ground on affordability.

We need to provide homes of varying sizes that are affordable to a wide range of people, including very low income households. But we also need to make sure that middle class people and families have places to live.

Preservation of existing neighborhoods and our rent­-controlled homes depends on providing opportunities for creating new neighborhoods where there are currently no apartments or houses to displace.

Santa Monica is an incredible city. People want to live here and will pay a premium to do so. But those people who can afford that premium will always be able to out bid lower­ income people for the same, small supply of housing.

If we don’t build along the boulevards and in formerly commercial zones, that problem will never get any better because wealthier renters will have no other options but to vie for a spot in older, rent-­controlled apartments.

Speculators will begin to purchase property in existing neighborhoods, use the Ellis Act to remove existing housing, and build anew. Unfortunately, state law makes the City powerless to stop this. All the City can do is try and refocus demand to live in Santa Monica away from existing neighborhoods.

While Santa Monica cannot, nor should it, solve the state’s housing crisis alone, we must actively be a part of the solution instead of contributing to the problem. We won’t stop people from moving to our region nor will we stop children from being born here. However, we can decide whether those people will have homes.

Will our decisions today make the Santa Monica of tomorrow a place where all our children ­­ not just the wealthiest ­­ have an opportunity to live a high quality of life?

Santa Monica has always had good conversations about these issues. Let’s make sure that these decisions are made with open minds, clear facts and a sense that we are all in this together. We shouldn’t let the selfish motivations or the extremism of some get in the way of moving all of us forward ­­ together ­­ as one city.

Craig Hamilton

Ana Jara

Leslie Lambert

Joanne Bonner Leavitt

Kristina Lizama

Cynthia Rose

for Santa Monica Forward

in Opinion
Related Posts

SMa.r.t. Column: The Mansionization of Santa Monica

June 17, 2022

June 17, 2022

Editor’s note: This column originally appeared in print in 2016.  In the 1980s, Santa Monica’s single family zoning code was...

OP-Ed Response to DTSM Board Chair Barry Snell and Plea to City Council Regarding Safety Ambassadors and Ambassador Program

June 14, 2022

June 14, 2022

I am responding to the OP-ED (dated June 7, 2022, Santa Monica Mirror) by City-appointed DTSM Board Member and now...

SMa.r.t. Column: Wheeling Electrically

June 9, 2022

June 9, 2022

A recent weekend visit to Dana Point, on the Orange County coastline, revealed a curious scene: dozens, if not hundreds...

Population Loss: New Era or Pandemic Glitch?

June 3, 2022

June 3, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist The numbers suggest a major change is underway in California. It would take a Nostradamus to...

SMa.r.t. Column: The Sound of Silence Is Big & Tall

June 3, 2022

June 3, 2022

All too often these days we find ourselves wondering how we could have been so correct about so many planning...

OP-Ed: DTSM Chair Barry Snell on Safety Ambassadors

June 2, 2022

June 2, 2022

By Barry Snell Chair, Downtown Santa Monica, Inc. Board of Directors  The Downtown Santa Monica, Inc. (DTSM) Board of Directors...

Affordable Spaces for Small Business

May 27, 2022

May 27, 2022

Los Angeles County recently proposed a program providing financial incentives for certain “Legacy” family businesses in their original historical location....

​​Doubt Removed: Oil Refiners Gouging Us

May 23, 2022

May 23, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist There was some room for doubt back in February, when gasoline prices rose precipitously: Until the...

Is the Big Housing Crunch Mostly Fiction?

May 20, 2022

May 20, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist In some parts of California, there is definitely a housing crunch: small supplies of homes for...

Is Gelson’s Our Future? Bigger Is Not Better & Not Necessary! – Part 2

May 20, 2022

May 20, 2022

The dream of our beachfront city is about to become a nightmare! Just imagine a tsunami of these projects washing...

Column From Santa Monica Mayor Himmelrich: We Walk the Talk

May 12, 2022

May 12, 2022

By Sue Himmelrich, Santa Moncia Mayor  I like the SMa.r.t. architects. I often agree with them. But in allowing Mark...

Is Gelson’s Our Future? Bigger Is Not Better!

May 12, 2022

May 12, 2022

It’s appalling to see what’s happening in our city – projects recently built or about to be approved – in...

Renting Your Second Home

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

If you are among the many Americans who own a second home that you occasionally use as a vacation getaway,...

Column: Cities Fight to Maintain Distinctive Characters

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist Anyone who knows California well will realize that Palo Alto does not look much like nearby...

SMa.r.t. Column: Gelson’s, Boxed-In

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

This week we are re-visiting an article from 2018 regarding the Miramar project, by simply replacing the word “Miramar” with...