May 19, 2022 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Letter: Dispensary Location Appropriateness Vs. Patients’ Reasonable Safe Access:

Dear Editor,

Santa Monicans for Safe Access (SAMOSA) should like to comment on your article Santa Monica Zoning Ordinance Update Meetings: Childcare, Cannabis, Cars & Capacity published on April 17. Your article mentioned that the permissible areas where a medical marijuana dispensary might be located are, essentially, along Wilshire and Santa Monica Blvds. East of Lincoln. In fact, it is far more restrictive than that.

Dispensaries may not locate near any sensitive uses (e.g., schools, parks, etc.). SAMOSA should like to point out that the proximity rules for dispensaries are far more strict than the rules for adult-oriented or alcohol stores, for example. While those types of stores have a proximity restriction of only 500′, dispensaries have a restriction of 600′. Additionally, while we are not aware of any “buffer” requirement applicable to those types of stores, SAMOSA does support a 1,000 buffer rule between the two allowable dispensaries. Given the great density of sensitive uses throughout the City, most of the areas along Wilshire and Santa Monica Blvds. where a dispensary might locate are in fact excluded. Surely, this represents a fair, reasonable and compassionate balance between patients’ safe access versus location appropriateness.

Finally, the vast majority of Santa Monicans consider these rules for dispensaries to be considerate yet reasonable. For example, at the Council meeting on April 14 we read into the record a letter written by Thomas Landau which he sent to the Council in late 2013. Mr. Landau said, in part, ” I have lived, worked, conducted business, built a home in Santa Monica Canyon and raised 3 children in and around Santa Monica for more than 40 years. The purpose of this letter is to urge you to adopt reasonable regulations to allow medical marijuana facilities within our City.” His architectural firm built in Santa Monica alone the Sea Colony, the MTV Building, the Milken Building and many other landmark buildings (not to mention the tallest building in the world in Dubai). When he wrote his letter, he was suffering from cancer. He died about a year after writing his letter. Medical marijuana gave him a great amount of relief from his suffering in his final years. As his friend, Mr. Landau expressed to me often his bewilderment and burden over why he couldn’t have safe local access. [Editor, we previously sent you Mr. Landau’s letter.]

Like this great Santa Monican – Mr. Landau – countless other resident-patients live, work and raise their children in Santa Monica. Having just two dispensaries along Wilshire and Santa Monica Blvds. East of Lincoln coupled with the very restrictive proximity to sensitive uses and a 1,000′ buffer between them isn’t unreasonable or insensitive – is it?

Sincerely,

Bill Leahy

in Opinion
Related Posts

Column From Santa Monica Mayor Himmelrich: We Walk the Talk

May 12, 2022

May 12, 2022

By Sue Himmelrich, Santa Moncia Mayor  I like the SMa.r.t. architects. I often agree with them. But in allowing Mark...

Is Gelson’s Our Future? Bigger Is Not Better!

May 12, 2022

May 12, 2022

It’s appalling to see what’s happening in our city – projects recently built or about to be approved – in...

Renting Your Second Home

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

If you are among the many Americans who own a second home that you occasionally use as a vacation getaway,...

Column: Cities Fight to Maintain Distinctive Characters

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist Anyone who knows California well will realize that Palo Alto does not look much like nearby...

SMa.r.t. Column: Gelson’s, Boxed-In

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

This week we are re-visiting an article from 2018 regarding the Miramar project, by simply replacing the word “Miramar” with...

Column: Are You Talking Yourself Out of Saving for Retirement? Here’s How to Break the Habit

May 5, 2022

May 5, 2022

Saving for retirement can be an abstract concept. It’s something we all know we should do, but the farther away...

SMa.r.t. Column: Failure to Plan…

April 30, 2022

April 30, 2022

Over the last approximately two years your City has been busy trying to respond to new California laws that are...

Letter to Editor: Your “Standing Firm With Santa Monica” Initiative

April 25, 2022

April 25, 2022

The following is an open letter to Councilmember Sue Himmelrich from Santa Monica resident Arthur Jeon regarding a proposed transfer...

SMa.r.t. Column: Planning The Real Future

April 24, 2022

April 24, 2022

In the 1970s, renowned USC architecture professor Ralph Knowles developed a method for planning and designing cities that would dramatically...

SMa.r.t. Column: New City Financial Plan: The Resident Homeowner Bank

April 15, 2022

April 15, 2022

Part II: Who pays the proposed transfer tax and where does the money go? Last week, we introduced the proposed...

Column: NIMBYs Getting a Bad Rap

April 8, 2022

April 8, 2022

By Tom Elias Rarely has a major group of Californians suffered a less deserved rash of insults and attacks than...

SMa.r.t. Column: New City Financial Plan – The Resident Homeowner Bank

April 8, 2022

April 8, 2022

Part 1 of 2 In this two-part article, we will discuss both the proposed transfer tax ballot initiative and the...

Column: Tackling Childcare Costs

April 7, 2022

April 7, 2022

Finding affordable, quality childcare is essential for many working parents. The current shortage of care options is helping drive up...

SMa.r.t. Column: Tunneling for Mobility

April 1, 2022

April 1, 2022

Editor’s note: this is an April Fools Day column and is intended to be satire.  Starting this year permits from...

SMa.r.t. Column: The Value of Our Boulevards

March 28, 2022

March 28, 2022

Following is a composite of past articles dealing with the accelerated demise of our beachfront environment together with the increasing...