June 9, 2023 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Letter To The Editor: All Our Children Deserve The Best Chance At A Great Start:

Dear Editor,

This week, the Council will consider the first comprehensive update of our zoning ordinance in more than three decades. This document should reflect the values of our community. Equitable access to safe, affordable, high quality early childhood education for working families is truly indispensable for our community.

The zoning ordinance update wisely proposed that early child care education centers be allowed in single-family home neighborhoods pursuant to conditional use permit, consistent with the way they have been treated in all multi-family residential zones for many years. However, the version being proposed to the Council next week  eliminates early childhood education centers from ever being considered in single-family residential neighborhoods, where many children live.

This is unnecessarily drastic. Under the standards proposed in the zoning ordinance update, an early childhood education center planned for a single-family neighborhood would have to go through a regulatory gauntlet, including public hearings before the Planning Commission and potentially the City Council, to obtain a conditional use permit. Neighborhood residents would have multiple opportunities to weigh in with concerns and objections, as well as to impose conditions to mitigate the challenges a new early childhood education center might bring to the neighborhood.

Additionally, these centers exist for the education of our youngest children. It simply doesn’t make sense that schools are allowed to operate in single-family residential zones, but early childhood education centers are not. The zoning ordinance update would hold early childhood education centers to the same standards to which we hold our schools. All education facilities should be given equal treatment under our zoning standards and be allowed in our single-family neighborhoods because we want them near to the families they serve.

Even though high land prices make it unlikely that early childhood education centers would open in single-family residential neighborhoods, we should not foreclose the possibility when the need for high quality early childhood education is so great.

Another change being considered is restricting supervised outdoor play in existing day care and early childhood education facilities to no later than 6 p.m. Currently, children are allowed to play outdoors while supervised as late as 8 pm in the summertime, so long as the sun is out.

The proposed restriction, however, would mean that kids can’t be engaged in outdoor programs during spring and summer when it’s light outside after 6 pm. If their parents can’t pick them up before 6 pm, they will lose out on essential outdoor play experience, which, leading experts agree, is essential to the educational development of young children.

Our community has been dedicated to high quality early childhood education for decades.

The most recent example of Santa Monica’s commitment to our children’s future is the joint effort between the city and Santa Monica College to create the Early Childhood Education Center (ECEC) at the Civic Center. The ECEC will provide much needed full-day care for many of our community’s working families.

The Center will not only provide early childhood education for up to 106 infants, toddlers, and pre-school aged children, it will also be a place for our future educators to learn from leading experts in the field in a hands-on environment.

Centers like SMC’s ECEC as well as family day care centers, the largest of which each serve up to 14 children, are vital institutions for working families and the future of our children. If quality early childhood education is not available, especially for infants and toddlers, many working Santa Monica families find themselves forced to choose between continuing to work and staying home to take care of children. Or, if one parent simply cannot stay home, then the family must scramble to piece together substandard care for their children. Those difficult choices have grave consequences for many families.

While the proposed zoning update may look to many like an arcane and tedious document, some of what lies within can profoundly affect the lives of our most vulnerable residents.

Irene Zivi

Judy Abdo

Leti McNeil Light

Laurie Lieberman

Barbi Appelquist

Lisa Lizama

Betsy Hiteshew

Gleam Davis

for Santa Monica Forward

in Opinion
Related Posts

Landmarks Commission Back From the Dead

June 2, 2023

June 2, 2023

For over three years, SMa.r.t. (Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow) has consistently warned that recently increased intense development...

SMa.r.t. Column: Improving Santa Monica’s Future: A Resident-Oriented Master Plan

May 28, 2023

May 28, 2023

Improving Santa Monica’s Future: A Resident-Oriented Master Plan Santa Monica, like many cities, requires a well-defined master plan to guide...

Pretext Stops Are a Vital Crime Prevention Tool

May 22, 2023

May 22, 2023

By Cody Green, Santa Monica Police Officers Association (SMPOA) Chairman and Lieutenant, SMPD  Recently the Santa Monica Public Safety Oversight...

Is City Government Listening to You?

May 21, 2023

May 21, 2023

Sometimes, it might feel like City Council members or local government staff aren’t paying attention to the concerns of residents....

New Program Can Help Protect Southern California Homes in the Event of an Earthquake

May 13, 2023

May 13, 2023

Residents Have Until May 31 To Apply For Seismic Retrofit Grants By Janiele Maffei, Chief Mitigation Officer for the California...

SMO (So Many Options) Part 1

April 20, 2023

April 20, 2023

SMart (Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow)  The volume of discussion around the options for Santa Monica Airport (SMO)...

SMa.r.t. Column: Reusing Buildings for the Benefit of All

April 2, 2023

April 2, 2023

[Almost two years ago our colleague Michael Jolly prepared this analysis of the benefits and risks of repurposing existing buildings,...

SMa.r.t. Column: I Told You So

March 28, 2023

March 28, 2023

On January17, 2015  SMa.r.t. posted a prophetic article in the Daily Press written by Ron Goldman FAIA advocating maintaining a...

Column: SB 9 Ended R-1 Zoning, but It’s Not Meeting Goals

March 11, 2023

March 11, 2023

By Tom Elias More than a year after it took effect, the landmark housing density law known as SB 9...

SMa.r.t. Column: The Urgency to Retrofit Earthquake-Deficient Buildings

March 6, 2023

March 6, 2023

Recent early-morning tremors off the Malibu coast, and the huge and terrible earthquake in Turkey and Syria have made us...

SMa.r.t. Column: ​​Reinforcing the Future – A Revisit

February 27, 2023

February 27, 2023

Six years go we discussed, in these pages, the city’s then-renewed earthquake-retrofit rules. At the time we argued that the...

Column: The Inevitable Conversions Begin Multiplying

February 25, 2023

February 25, 2023

By Tom Elias It’s a phenomenon from New York to Dallas to Fresno and Los Angeles, one that seemed inevitable...

Column: The Fantasy World of California Housing Policy

February 20, 2023

February 20, 2023

By Tom Elias If you’re looking for sure things among bills under consideration in the state Legislature, think of one...

SMa.r.t. Column: Santa Monica City Council – Planners, Politicians, or Developers?

February 19, 2023

February 19, 2023

Santa Monica – a progressive city 20 years ago, a chaotic city today! A city that is struggling for its...

SMa.r.t. Column: What’s Wrong With This Picture?

February 16, 2023

February 16, 2023

The picture shown above is the future of Santa Monica. Large tall buildings along the Boulevards and Avenues plus Downtown...