May 16, 2022 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Letter To The Editor: How About No To Traffic?:

Dear Editor,

The debate about development is still raging. How high? How much parking? How much density? All of these questions are irrelevant. Traffic is destroying Santa Monica and the City has its head in the sand when it comes to this truth.

It took me seven minutes to go two small blocks to get across Lincoln on Ocean Park. 23rd street at 3 pm is already a parking lot. Olympic? It took me 30 minutes to go one block at 5 pm.

The 10 Freeway is a parking lot after 2:15 until 7:30 or 8 pm. You have no option for driving east – Sunset, Wilshire, Santa Monica , Olympic and Pico are all jammed.  I have to drive down to another street south of the City to go anywhere east after 2:30 pm. And these neighborhoods now have signs posted “Stop Mar Vista Traffic Armageddon.”

Hello? Is anyone listening?

I used to love going to downtown Santa Monica. I would brag about how wonderful it was to live in a place where you could drive five minutes, go downtown, get a parking spot and shop. It was how life should be. A wonderful living experience in one of the most beautiful cites in the world.  Not any longer!

A few weeks ago, we had to decide between best replica watches going to Hollywood or Santa Monica to the movies on a Saturday night. We opted for Santa Monica since the theater is only five minutes from my house. Well, the trip to movies took 40 minutes from my door to the theater. Traffic was that bad! Next time, we’ll go to Hollywood.

How can the City consider more development for even five minutes? Don’t they live here? How do the City officials get around? Are they blind to the gridlock? Or do they just not care? Or are there “kickbacks” that are so abundant that they justify it?

How can the City approve any more new building that would just bring in several thousand more cars? The issue is not to develop or not – the issue is simply – can we accommodate more cars?  If the answer is no – then all of the beautiful planned new developments are meaningless.  It is that simple.  It is not about development – it is about the traffic.

It is time for every person in Santa Monica to stand up and shout: “No More Traffic!” If we cannot sustain anymore traffic – then the City has filled its development cup of possibilities. Stop!!!!

Nora Hamill

Santa Monica

in Opinion
Related Posts

Column From Santa Monica Mayor Himmelrich: We Walk the Talk

May 12, 2022

May 12, 2022

By Sue Himmelrich, Santa Moncia Mayor  I like the SMa.r.t. architects. I often agree with them. But in allowing Mark...

Is Gelson’s Our Future? Bigger Is Not Better!

May 12, 2022

May 12, 2022

It’s appalling to see what’s happening in our city – projects recently built or about to be approved – in...

Renting Your Second Home

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

If you are among the many Americans who own a second home that you occasionally use as a vacation getaway,...

Column: Cities Fight to Maintain Distinctive Characters

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist Anyone who knows California well will realize that Palo Alto does not look much like nearby...

SMa.r.t. Column: Gelson’s, Boxed-In

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

This week we are re-visiting an article from 2018 regarding the Miramar project, by simply replacing the word “Miramar” with...

Column: Are You Talking Yourself Out of Saving for Retirement? Here’s How to Break the Habit

May 5, 2022

May 5, 2022

Saving for retirement can be an abstract concept. It’s something we all know we should do, but the farther away...

SMa.r.t. Column: Failure to Plan…

April 30, 2022

April 30, 2022

Over the last approximately two years your City has been busy trying to respond to new California laws that are...

Letter to Editor: Your “Standing Firm With Santa Monica” Initiative

April 25, 2022

April 25, 2022

The following is an open letter to Councilmember Sue Himmelrich from Santa Monica resident Arthur Jeon regarding a proposed transfer...

SMa.r.t. Column: Planning The Real Future

April 24, 2022

April 24, 2022

In the 1970s, renowned USC architecture professor Ralph Knowles developed a method for planning and designing cities that would dramatically...

SMa.r.t. Column: New City Financial Plan: The Resident Homeowner Bank

April 15, 2022

April 15, 2022

Part II: Who pays the proposed transfer tax and where does the money go? Last week, we introduced the proposed...

Column: NIMBYs Getting a Bad Rap

April 8, 2022

April 8, 2022

By Tom Elias Rarely has a major group of Californians suffered a less deserved rash of insults and attacks than...

SMa.r.t. Column: New City Financial Plan – The Resident Homeowner Bank

April 8, 2022

April 8, 2022

Part 1 of 2 In this two-part article, we will discuss both the proposed transfer tax ballot initiative and the...

Column: Tackling Childcare Costs

April 7, 2022

April 7, 2022

Finding affordable, quality childcare is essential for many working parents. The current shortage of care options is helping drive up...

SMa.r.t. Column: Tunneling for Mobility

April 1, 2022

April 1, 2022

Editor’s note: this is an April Fools Day column and is intended to be satire.  Starting this year permits from...

SMa.r.t. Column: The Value of Our Boulevards

March 28, 2022

March 28, 2022

Following is a composite of past articles dealing with the accelerated demise of our beachfront environment together with the increasing...