July 11, 2025 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Being Paid to Line Up? Perhaps:

By Zach Cantor

Principal, Cantor Law

Last month a California judge allowed a class action suit, filed on behalf of warehouse workers, to proceed against a subsidiary of Staples Inc. Among other things, workers said they were not being paid for time they spent – up to a half hour – standing in line waiting to undergo security checks. They’d have to go through the line when leaving for lunch, too, which ate into the time the 30 minutes they actually had to eat.

The security screening was intended to deter theft. But while waiting their turn, the workers remained under Staples’ direct control – they weren’t allowed to leave – and therefore, should be paid wages for their time, the suit says.

Their case seems pretty clear, right? If you’re standing in line at work waiting for someone to let you go home, you are on the clock. 

Now consider your own job. Is it as easy to tell when you are on the clock and when you aren’t?

For many, routine electronic communication has blurred the line between personal time and work time. You check email after work or on weekends, you take client calls on your days off, and work seeps through your smartphone right into your pocket.

Have you ever taken an important phone call on your way to work? Many people do, and it’s common for employers to have an expectation, perhaps unspoken, that those in key positions be available for calls, texts and emails even when they are off the clock. Should a company pay overtime wages for electronic correspondence, even during a commute to work?

The 2010 case of Rutti v. Lojack Corp. Inc. is instructive. Mike Rutti installed car alarms for Lojack Inc. He was required to keep his cell phone on at all times and to drive directly between home and the job site without making any additional stops. After returning home, he was required to upload data obtained on the job from a portable data terminal to headquarters via the Internet.

Citing the so-called “going and coming rule,” the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals determined that Rutti’s commute time was compensable under California law, but not under federal law, which says employers need not compensate employees for time spent traveling to and from where they perform their job duties. However, the 9th Circuit found that because Rutti’s time was subject to the employer’s control, Rutti had to be paid under California law. The court considered that Rutti might have to answer his mobile phone at any time and could not make additional stops, like stopping at the store, while going to and from the job site. To the Rutti court, the relevant question was whether the employee’s time is “subject to the control” of the employer. If so, then the court considers whether the time spent on a particular function is “de minimus,” of minor importance. According to the court, that Rutti kept his mobile phone on and did not deviate from his work route wasn’t an issue. However, Rutti’s 10 to 15 minutes per day spent uploading data from the portable data terminal amounted to significant work time, over an hour per week. California law sees that as paid time. However, under federal law, that time wasn’t compensable because Rutti was relieved of all duties upon returning home-and could input the data at a time of his choosing.

Rutti’s portable data terminal is not so different from your smartphone. Nor is Rutti’s commute unlike any in which an employee is obliged to respond right away to a phone call. The same considerations are present: There is not a particular time the employee is to allot for the task; time spent on a work task can take anywhere from five to 15 minutes; it’s a regular part of the employee’s job duties; and the employee is off duty when completing the task. 

Therefore, it might not be “de minimus” under California law.

Today, your smartphone might act as a timecard, with overtime accruing for work done at home. Between phone calls, texts and e-mails, an employee’s mobile device has quickly gone from a convenience to a nuisance.

The evolution of the workday will likely continue to bleed into the home through the employee’s smartphones.

Employers should have clear policies in place that detail when and where employees can use them for work. Employers must also explicitly communicate to managers and employees that the written policy trumps verbal representations, to deter expression of contradictory expectations.

 

Zachary Cantor is principal attorney of Cantor Law of Santa Monica: info@cantorlawyers.com or 213.674.0325.

in News
<>Related Posts

L.A. Louver Marks David Hockney’s 88th with Exhibit

July 11, 2025

July 11, 2025

Hockney, a British artist born in 1937, gained fame with the British Pop Art movement and later became known for...

Suspect Arrested in Shoe Retail Theft Spree Across LA County

July 11, 2025

July 11, 2025

During the search, police recovered two firearms and a significant quantity of merchandise The Los Angeles Police Department’s Organized Retail...

Suspect Arrested in Santa Monica Pier Arson Incidents

July 10, 2025

July 10, 2025

The suspect, matching video footage from an arcade, was taken into custody Santa Monica Police Department officers arrested a suspect...

SMPD Launch New Recruitment Website Amid High Vacancy Rates

July 10, 2025

July 10, 2025

The site features multimedia content, including day-in-the-life videos and officer profiles, highlighting the impact of serving the community The Santa...

Father-Daughter Authors to Host Book Signing to Aid Fire-Affected Women

July 10, 2025

July 10, 2025

Ten percent of proceeds from book and art sales will benefit the Pacific Palisades Rebuilding Fund, a nonprofit initiative created...

Metro Reports Crime Drop, Higher Rider Satisfaction, and Progress on Major Projects

July 9, 2025

July 9, 2025

The Authority said the drop in violent incidents—down to the lowest level since May 2019—coincided with more uniformed personnel and...

Santa Monica Joins Regional Lawsuit to Halt Unconstitutional ICE Raids

July 9, 2025

July 9, 2025

The motion to intervene seeks to ensure that Santa Monica and other plaintiff-intervenors can advocate for their residents’ rights in...

Promenade Restaurant Introduces Lunch Menu Set at $18 Per Person

July 9, 2025

July 9, 2025

The fixed $18 price point targets commuters and those seeking a power lunch or a change of scenery The restaurant...

Santa Monica Council Votes in Support of Park-Centric Future at Airport Site

July 9, 2025

July 9, 2025

The decision followed a contentious meeting with over 140 public speakers and more than 1,000 emails received by the council...

Housing for Health Chief Appointed to Lead Unified Homeless Services Department

July 9, 2025

July 9, 2025

Veteran Housing Advocate to Oversee Streamlined LA County Services The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday confirmed the...

‘Adoptapalooza’ Pet Adoption Festival Returns to Main Street This Weekend

July 9, 2025

July 9, 2025

The free, family-friendly event aims to connect adoptable animals with new owners Green Dog Dental & Veterinary Center will host...

Virtual Town Hall to Discuss Proposed Resilient Rebuilding Authority

July 9, 2025

July 9, 2025

The agency, to be run by political appointees, would manage permitting, development, zoning, and funding, modeled after post-disaster recoveries Los...

New Agenda Coaching: Changing Lives in LA

July 8, 2025

July 8, 2025

Students Work Toward Applied Success with Executive Function Coaching Services The demands of daily routines and studies sometimes bear weight...

Saint Monica Prep Students Win Award for Anti-Street Racing PSA Video

July 8, 2025

July 8, 2025

The winning public service announcement, titled “Not Worth It,” was highlighted in a post on X by @LADOTofficial  Students from...

Anti-Drunk Driving Resolution Introduced as City Council Honors Late Palisades Teen Killed in Crash

July 8, 2025

July 8, 2025

Levi, who was set to attend the University of Virginia this fall, was killed by a drunk driver on May...