June 27, 2022 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Opinion: SMa.r.t. Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow: The Alchemy Of Greed

Opinion: Our City is experiencing an identity crisis fueled by gluttony. The powers in the City of Santa Monica have apparently decided that bigger is better and that that this “bigger” needs to be fueled constantly by more…more development, taller and denser buildings, structures that are out-of-scale with our town…more people…more tourists…more workers…more residents. Just More. Our City’s appetite appears to be insatiable. Santa Monica government has become like a giant Pac-Man that wants to devour the City that our residents love. And – make no mistake – our residents love this place. It is, as the City Seal says, a place for “fortunate people in a fortunate land.”

Residents want to see a city that thrives, but they also want to breathe. They are concerned about the day-to-day issues of life in an increasingly big city. We are now constantly congested. Rents are skyrocketing. Local restaurants can’t survive and homegrown retail appears doomed. Crime is rising. Our long-time homelessness issues seem unsolvable. The Fire Department now handles 16,000-plus calls per year. Our Police Department needs more sworn personnel. Our sewers are backed up. Our electrical grid suffers repeated outages. We’re building a new fire station that won’t even be large enough to meet our needs by the day it opens. We can’t handle the masses of concertgoers that our Pier attracts in the summer. And while we celebrate the opening of the Expo light rail and our Breeze Bike Share program, both have actually increased the congestion and chaos in the heart of Santa Monica. Our school structures have deteriorated. Repairs run years behind. At Samohi paint is peeling, buildings are missing letters and even the signs identifying the school name are not kept up. At other SMMUSD schools, the potential for lead and PCP poisoning is apparent. Yet nothing is done.

We no longer appear to have the characteristics of the beachfront town residents fell in love with. To many of us, Santa Monica appears to be on steroids, and a serious intervention is in order. To some, the answer is “build more.” Developers gaze upon Santa Monica as a gold mine that must be tapped. Look at the fervor that a slow growth measure in this election cycle has attracted. The donations accrued to fight the resident-sponsored measure will soon top $1.5 million. Much like the “robber barons” of the 1900s these developers and their aligned businesses will cajole, persuade and dispense with the truth in order to capitalize on the income stream they foresee from their properties in our town. They hawk the need for more housing as subterfuge for their real issue…desire to suck more profit from Santa Monica. Imagine, if you will, all of these businesses, their affiliated non-profits and their local, national and international developer friends at a giant Hometown Buffet. As they salivate over the unlimited food they are about to feast upon, the residents who own the buffet look on in horror as these “guests” keep eating and eating. This gluttony of greed will consume our city unless residents close their buffet. 

Our City staff and City council promise to ease traffic congestion but it keeps getting worse. They suggest if we live closer together we won’t need to drive. They have become skilled at echoing the developers’ calls for adding more height and density to our downtown and our boulevards. They suggest that 30-plus proposed developments will not add to our woes. From new hotels to mixed-use, mid-rise commercial/residential buildings and a city sponsored, twelve-story building on city land in the heart of our downtown, the steroid analogy is apropos. Many residents call these developments “run-away” – more, always more.

In 2008, Councilmember Ted Winterer (seeking re-election at the upcoming election) talked about our city’s growth and the need to contain it. “If one is truly concerned about run-away development, the only way to slow it down is to actually slow it down,” he said. Ted went on to talk about traffic and the need to control the actions of City Hall. He said about the Land Use and Circulation Element (LUCE) and City Hall projections, “the City’s projected amount of commercial development for the next 16 years was surpassed in only six years. And did our city stop growing after it reached the projections it had planned for? Hardly. City Hall just changed the plan.” Wow. And that happens over and over again. The gluttony I talked about? Yep, in City Hall – in the corridors of power, our residents are being derided for asking for limits on growth. Yet those limits are necessary. According to Jennifer Taylor, Santa Monica’s Economic Development Administrator, Santa Monica hosted 8.3 million visitors last year, a figure up from 7.3 million in 2014. On the surface that sounds positive. However the additional police and fire personnel mentioned earlier are needed because of this rise in visitors. As we continue to increase the heights and density of our buildings, strive to add more office workers and house more people, our need for infrastructure correspondingly rises. As that occurs, the City seeks more revenue. Our taxes and fees continue to balloon. With a $614.2 million annual budget, you would think that our 94,000 residents would receive free bus service, discounted parking meter rates and unlimited swimming at our city pools. Yet, residents are left out. Instead, the City’s quest for new revenue is endless. Fees for services rise, taxes increase and residents increasingly are angry and distrustful of city hall.

Are we, the residents, destined to lose the City we love? Can the buffet be closed? Can the modern day robber barons be controlled? The answer is a resounding “yes.” We must demand that City council and staff answer to residents first, rather than the moneyed interests that currently control their time and energy (note that $1.5 million donated to fight our “pitchfork-wielding” residents.) We must slow the pace of change, decide that enough is enough, and not allow history to repeat itself. We know that City Hall will not slow development when money is the controlling interest. We the residents must change the discussion. Santa Monica’s mantra must become “Do no harm to residents, ever.”

Phil Brock for SMa.r.t. (Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow).

Thane Roberts AIA, Architect, Robert H. Taylor AIA, Mario Fonda-Bonardi AIA, Ron Goldman FAIA, Daniel Jansenson Architect, Samuel Tolkin AIA, Phil Brock, Santa Monica Arts Commission.

in Opinion
Related Posts

SMa.r.t. Column: The Mansionization of Santa Monica

June 17, 2022

June 17, 2022

Editor’s note: This column originally appeared in print in 2016.  In the 1980s, Santa Monica’s single family zoning code was...

OP-Ed Response to DTSM Board Chair Barry Snell and Plea to City Council Regarding Safety Ambassadors and Ambassador Program

June 14, 2022

June 14, 2022

I am responding to the OP-ED (dated June 7, 2022, Santa Monica Mirror) by City-appointed DTSM Board Member and now...

SMa.r.t. Column: Wheeling Electrically

June 9, 2022

June 9, 2022

A recent weekend visit to Dana Point, on the Orange County coastline, revealed a curious scene: dozens, if not hundreds...

Population Loss: New Era or Pandemic Glitch?

June 3, 2022

June 3, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist The numbers suggest a major change is underway in California. It would take a Nostradamus to...

SMa.r.t. Column: The Sound of Silence Is Big & Tall

June 3, 2022

June 3, 2022

All too often these days we find ourselves wondering how we could have been so correct about so many planning...

OP-Ed: DTSM Chair Barry Snell on Safety Ambassadors

June 2, 2022

June 2, 2022

By Barry Snell Chair, Downtown Santa Monica, Inc. Board of Directors  The Downtown Santa Monica, Inc. (DTSM) Board of Directors...

Affordable Spaces for Small Business

May 27, 2022

May 27, 2022

Los Angeles County recently proposed a program providing financial incentives for certain “Legacy” family businesses in their original historical location....

​​Doubt Removed: Oil Refiners Gouging Us

May 23, 2022

May 23, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist There was some room for doubt back in February, when gasoline prices rose precipitously: Until the...

Is the Big Housing Crunch Mostly Fiction?

May 20, 2022

May 20, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist In some parts of California, there is definitely a housing crunch: small supplies of homes for...

Is Gelson’s Our Future? Bigger Is Not Better & Not Necessary! – Part 2

May 20, 2022

May 20, 2022

The dream of our beachfront city is about to become a nightmare! Just imagine a tsunami of these projects washing...

Column From Santa Monica Mayor Himmelrich: We Walk the Talk

May 12, 2022

May 12, 2022

By Sue Himmelrich, Santa Moncia Mayor  I like the SMa.r.t. architects. I often agree with them. But in allowing Mark...

Is Gelson’s Our Future? Bigger Is Not Better!

May 12, 2022

May 12, 2022

It’s appalling to see what’s happening in our city – projects recently built or about to be approved – in...

Renting Your Second Home

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

If you are among the many Americans who own a second home that you occasionally use as a vacation getaway,...

Column: Cities Fight to Maintain Distinctive Characters

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist Anyone who knows California well will realize that Palo Alto does not look much like nearby...

SMa.r.t. Column: Gelson’s, Boxed-In

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

This week we are re-visiting an article from 2018 regarding the Miramar project, by simply replacing the word “Miramar” with...