June 22, 2024 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

OpEd: Driving Backwards

By Steve Stajich

I haven’t been in one of those cars that drive themselves yet, but I imagine that you can sit just about anywhere you like since the thing, you know, does the steering for you. If so, maybe you can do what my sisters and I used to do on long family car trips; sit in the back of the station wagon, looking out the rear window… to see where we’d been.

news-standingrock12916bnews-standingrock12916There’s a certain amount of concern right now, and rightly so, that we’re all going to be looking out the back window of the car. Nothing, absolutely nothing, so far put forward by the President-elect suggests progress and forward motion. Promises to bring back the coal industry, to deconstruct health care, to create registries that verge on the edge of internment camps – well, you don’t need me to write up the score card. It will be a miracle if, after four years, we are anywhere near where we were when we started with this guy.

So who is taking charge of progress if our government dedicates itself to turning back the hands of time? It appears that Native Americans are not only insisting we make progress, but that we do it for reasons that are as old school as a coal-burning power plant.

After a months-long protest at Lake Oahe in North Dakota, Native American tribes and thousands of others who have joined their protest were happy to hear that the Army would not approve the easement to necessary to permit the “controversial” Dakota Access Pipeline to pass under the lake.

By the way, can we take a moment and protest current use of the word “controversial?” The word is abused on a daily basis. Kanye West’s behavior is not “controversial,” it’s self-serving hype. New fashions aren’t “controversial,” nor are any television shows meant to act as padding around commercials for beer. Running an oil pipe line under a source of drinking water in violation of Native American lands isn’t “controversial,” it’s dumb and wrong and backwards.

Of course, many observe that the Standing Rock protest may just be getting thrown a bone, only to later have the new White House administration push the pipeline through anyway. Whether or not that happens, my larger point is that we will no longer have a government that is interested in any sort of real progress and instead wants to drive the car backwards, to go where we’ve been. I would not, for example, look to the next four years for improvement in public education achieved because of fresh federal financing.

But getting back to what has happened at Standing Rock. The protest to the pipeline was argued on moral grounds; that oil interests should not violate the Native lands and create risk of threatened water supplies. (Don’t be looking to hear the words “moral grounds” all that often in the next four years.)

The Natives were joined by those forces that believe any new piece of oil infrastructure becomes like the bars of a jail cell, keeping American imprisoned by retro and climate-changing fossil fuel technology. Thus, did Standing Rock become, in my view, an outpost pleading the case for progress:  Could we please move past dirty and poisoning sources of energy and into a cleaner energy future?

And yet the reasons the protest was initially mounted were retro in nature: Save the Earth (1970’s), Protect and Respect Native Lands and Rights (1778 to the present), No Blood for Oil (Bush-Cheney to present), and No Crap in My Drinking Water (Flint Michigan to now.)

We admired and will miss the Obama family, who just naturally presumed that most Americans thrive when true progress occurs. The job of remembering that humankind should naturally move forward now falls to civilians. Meanwhile, don’t expect fresh American footprints on the moon or Mars or much in the way of forward thinking the next four years.  Instead, our view will be out the back window of our national station wagon as all kinds of old places that we’ve already been to and moved on from are coming back to haunt us.

 

in Opinion
Related Posts

SM.a.r.t Column: The Up Zoning Scam (Part 1)

June 16, 2024

June 16, 2024

Over the last few years, the State of California has mandated a massive upzoning of cities to create capacity for...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Shape Up – On Steroids

June 9, 2024

June 9, 2024

Nine years ago, SMa.r.t wrote a series of articles addressing the adaptive re-use of existing structures. We titled one “Shape...

SM.a.r.t Column: The Challenge of Running a City When City Staff Have Different Priorities

June 2, 2024

June 2, 2024

Living in a city has its perks, but it can be a real headache when the folks running the show...

SM.a.r.t. Column: A Path to Affordable Ownership in Santa Monica

May 27, 2024

May 27, 2024

[Note: our guest author today is Andres Drobny, a former Professor of Economics at the University of London, the former...

SM.a.r.t. Column: A Path Forward for Santa Monica: Part II

May 19, 2024

May 19, 2024

As referenced in Part I of this article, the state’s use of faulty statistics and forceful legislation has left a...

SM.a.r.t. Column: A Path Forward for Santa Monica: Part I

May 12, 2024

May 12, 2024

To quickly summarize, California grapples with an ongoing housing crisis spurred by state implementation of over 100 policies and mandates...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Where Will Our Huddled Masses Sleep? Navigating California’s Affordable Housing Mandates

May 5, 2024

May 5, 2024

Just as Lady Liberty beckons the “huddled masses” of immigrants to America, cities like Santa Monica have an ethical obligation...

SM.a.r.t Column: SMCLC SPEAKS

April 28, 2024

April 28, 2024

SMart (Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow) periodically invites guest columnists who have made a significant contribution to the...

SM.a.r.t Column: Building Modern Boxes Lacks Identity

April 21, 2024

April 21, 2024

In the relentless pursuit of modernity, cities worldwide have witnessed the rise of so-called architectural marvels in the form of...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Santa Monica Needs Responsible Urban and Architectural Design

April 14, 2024

April 14, 2024

[SMa.r.t. note: Eight years ago, our highly esteemed and recently-passed colleague Ron Goldman documented his thoughts on the need for...

SM.a.r.t. Column: BLINK NOW!

April 7, 2024

April 7, 2024

Nine years ago, I wrote a column for SMa.r.t. titled SANTA MONICA: BEACH TOWN OR ‘DINGBAT’ CITY? (https://smdp.com/2015/05/09/santa-monica-beach-town-dingbat-city/)Here is the...

SM.a.r.t Column: ARB Courage (Part 2 of 2)

March 31, 2024

March 31, 2024

Last week we discussed the numerous flaws of the Gelson’s project as a perfect example of what not to do...

ARB Courage (Part 1 of 2)

March 24, 2024

March 24, 2024

On March 4, 2024, your ARB (Architectural Review Board) ruled in favor of the 521-unit Gelson’s Project at Ocean Park...

SM.a.r.t Column: Can California ARBs Balance Affordable Housing with Community Character in the Face of New Housing Laws?

March 17, 2024

March 17, 2024

By suggestion, I attended the March 4th ARB (Architectural Review Board) meeting that addressed the Gelson Lincoln Boulevard Project.  After...

S.M.a.r.t Column: On the Need for Safety

March 10, 2024

March 10, 2024

Earlier this week, in the dark pre-dawn hours, a pair of thugs covered in masks and hoodies burst into the...