December 1, 2021 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Open Letter: What Is the Santa Monica YWCA Board Missing?

Over the past number of weeks, I have been reading the many open letters from the community about the Santa Monica YWCA. In this era of constrained government budgets, the role of nonprofits and the vital services they deliver are essential to the well-being of a city’s most vulnerable residents. The Santa Monica YWCA has a strong history of serving youth and families in troubled situations through its transitional housing, life and work skills programs.

 

The story that has unfolded over the past year poses some questions:

 

1) When community nonprofit agencies have challenges that threaten their sustainability, they often look to other nonprofits with similar missions to find ways to continue their vital services. For example, WISE & Healthy Aging was formed when the Center for Healthy Aging joined with Wise Senior Services. Similarly, OPCC united with LAMP Community to form The PEOPLE Concern. Why isn’t the Santa Monica YWCA board talking to other nonprofit agencies? Specifically, why isn’t the Santa Monica YWCA board exploring how WISE & Healthy Aging, a longstanding community agency, can help carry on the legacy of the YWCA’s 90-year history of community service?

 

2) There is clearly mounting community support, especially from those who know the Santa Monica YWCA best, to have the current board consider a charitable transaction that would keep the property in use for a diversity of community residents. In particular, Sally Young’s letter to the editor in the weekend edition (Jan. 7 & 8) of “The Santa Monica Daily Press” is very powerful. Why is the Santa Monica YWCA board ignoring the voice of this past executive director, who is well-respected and who played a leading role in shaping the YWCA for 18 of its strongest years? And what about the voices of past presidents of the YWCA board, key volunteers, and past presidents of the Soroptimist Club and Kiwanis? These women gave their leadership, time and monies in support of the YWCA.

 

Why is the Santa Monica YWCA Board not at least exploring options with WISE & Healthy Aging, which has expressed interest in leveraging its service delivery know how to support innovations in intergenerational programs that would carry on much of the YWCA’s mission? The agency is an excellent example of leadership, financial stability and growth.

 

3) To move to selling the property to the highest bidder is coming across like a quick “money grab” by the current YWCA board. Are there conflicts of interest among those currently involved on the YWCA board as to where the monies will be going, and who will be managing such funds? Are there pet causes that could potentially receive grants from the sale’s proceeds? Or perhaps is their realtor unduly influencing the process to steer the sale to the highest bidder with its accompanying higher commission? After 90 years, is it really fair and just to have a few people decide what is to be done with the assets of this community nonprofit? Where is the community’s input in this?

 

4) The current Santa Monica YWCA board may be unintentionally falling short in its governance and foresight. Why not take the added time — especially after all these years and with the community’s growing concerns — to step back, re-evaluate, and at least open discussions with other nonprofits? Is that really too much to ask?

 

If the YWCA Board moves forward with a standard sale, and gives away the proceeds to other like causes, what’s left after all the monies are given away? It’s short-sighted and indeed shameful to be benefactors in the short term, and not work now to ensure a longer term investment for community residents. Where is the longer term gain in the current strategy of selling the property to the highest bidder? Why not try to ensure a visible legacy for the Santa Monica YWCA?

 

5) Some have mentioned the possible interests of Santa Monica College in acquiring the property. The College is a source of pride in Santa Monica, but as a number of residents have mentioned, isn’t SMC’s footprint with its five campuses big enough? Why would a community nonprofit board — the Santa Monica YWCA board — do that to the very community residents and neighbors, MANY who so willingly gave their support, donations and participation for nearly a century of our city’s history?

 

What is the Santa Monica YWCA board missing?

 

-Joyce Mann

26-year Santa Monica resident

Related Posts

Opinion: SB 9, 10: The Rebellion Begins

November 19, 2021

November 19, 2021

By Tom Elias, Columnist It was inevitable from the moment Gov. Gavin Newsom in mid-September signed this year’s two most...

Sacto Dems Dump Prop. 13 Reforms

November 5, 2021

November 5, 2021

By Tom Elias, Columnist For more than 40 years, Democrats in Sacramento have talked fervently about reforming the 1978 Proposition...

SMa.r.t. Column: When Water Runs Out

October 15, 2021

October 15, 2021

What happens when a City runs out of water? You have already heard of the torture endured by communities in...

Message From Santa Monica’s New City Manager David White

October 11, 2021

October 11, 2021

To the Santa Monica Community – it is with tremendous excitement that today I begin my first day as your...

Hot Flash: Can You Look Sexy in a CPAP?

September 26, 2021

September 26, 2021

I have sleep apnea.  I wear a CPAP to bed every night.  I look like I am a monster from...

LA County Committee Report Reflects a “Dire” Financial Future for Students of Santa Monica if City of Malibu’s Proposal to Split the District Is Approved

September 14, 2021

September 14, 2021

Editor’s note: the public comment period mentioned in the following letter has ended. The following is a letter from Santa...

SMa.r.t. Column: Stop the Steroids

September 10, 2021

September 10, 2021

Part 2/2 Santa Monicans face the usual fears of crime, Covid-19 and its collapsing job and housing impact including the...