July 26, 2024 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Opinion: Ocean Glimpses All That’s Left From Our Cityscape

By Steve Stajich

There can be a lot of disagreement about what to use as a measuring stick for over-development. Some might say you can only know it when you see it. I would argue that you know it when you can’t see something. Like the ocean or the sky when high-rise buildings begin to block the sun.

About two weeks before Christmas, I was cruising down Ocean Drive in the area between Colorado and Pico. I was suddenly taken with the fact that development in that area now causes you to have no idea where the ocean is, because that strip has become a canyon of tall buildings. On both sides of the street tall buildings dominate to the point that you could be anywhere at all, especially Miami. It chills one to think that Santa Monica’s long-time efforts to stop buildings that would have created a wall blocking views of the ocean for all except those who are in hotels on the beach has simply switched the battlefield to the east side of Ocean Boulevard.

This feeling of our city closing in on us, of artificial canyons being created in what we might call our ‘skyscape’, is unfortunately available at other locations in our city. Main Street closes in on you as you drive north toward the “Dogtown” area. All of the construction in the hospital and medical area around St. John’s is now looming over Santa Monica Boulevard. Waiting for a light on 4th Street before crossing the bridge traveling north into downtown, there’s the new train station and then you are consumed by downtown building height.

None of this is to say that a city shouldn’t look like a city but if in fact being near the Pacific Ocean is a valuable lasting resource to our city, especially as it pertains to tourism, we need to wonder aloud if we are shutting down the views that confirm that there is in fact an ocean out there.

When the park across from City Hall opened, one of its features was a kind of open air observation deck where one can walk up and look out over the ocean. But I’m citing the simple fact that a raised observation deck was needed to remind people where they were less than one block from the beach.

Consciousness about over-development rises up on an almost proposed project-to-project basis. Yet I’m guessing that the city fathers of Big Sur rarely argue at length over whether a five or ten story hotel or office complex should rise up on its breathtaking shores. We should have the same kind of awareness that if Santa Monica becomes more and more developed with taller and taller buildings, our essential charm and any quintessence we might have as an ocean side community will slowly drain away. And in its place these monuments to prosperity will continue to rise, denigrating one of our singular quality of life features here: That an ocean lays before us.

During the holiday season, I drove down 4th Street going south and must admit to enjoying the holiday decorations and lights. But it also felt as though that scene could have been anywhere. We’re never going to lose the solid build-up downtown between 4th and the beach, just as Marina del Rey will never tear down the beach construction it sought and obtained by making room for more waterfront property by creating more waterfront. Still, it can be more than a little disheartening to wait for a red light at Lincoln near Mindanao and turn your head to take in the high rise condos that give only the ocean-side tenants any view of the water.

In New York City the problem is similar but vertical rather than horizontal. The wealthy want a “view” and obtain it by living higher off the ground. Of course they don’t worry about earthquakes the same way we do here. And New York is now almost by definition a city about making money, especially since we’ve elevated one of its developers to the office of President. That’s not us.

A city is just that. It’s not a wooded area or farm country. The long protected wetland area in Playa Vista was greatly reduced to make room for condos and apartments that are variously ornamented on their exteriors to look like classic building facades. Grass covered spaces between the buildings and foot paths through the remaining wetland appealed to potential buyers as “lifestyle” accoutrements. But we’re never getting that area back to its natural and first position, at least not in our lifetimes. Santa Monica must remain vigilant if encroaching, sun-blocking and sky-filling canyons of development are going to prevent us from remembering that we are a bay city.

in Opinion
Related Posts

Food, Water, and Energy Part 2 of 4

July 21, 2024

July 21, 2024

Last week’s S.M.a,r,t, article (https://smmirror.com/2024/07/sm-a-r-t-column-food-water-and-energy-part-1-of-3/) talked about the seismic risks to the City from getting its three survival essentials, food,...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Food Water and Energy Part 1 of 3

July 14, 2024

July 14, 2024

Civilization, as we know it, requires many things, but the most critical and fundamental is an uninterrupted supply of three...

Letter to the Editor: Criticizing Israeli Policy Is Not Antisemitic

July 10, 2024

July 10, 2024

In the past several months, we’ve seen increasing protests against Israel’s actions in Gaza. We have also seen these protests...

SMA.R.T. WISHES ALL A VERY HAPPY 4TH OF JULY WEEK

July 7, 2024

July 7, 2024

We trust you are enjoying this holiday in celebration of Independence. Independence to be embraced, personally and civically, thru active...

SM.a.r.t Column: Santa Monica Under SCAG’s Boot

June 30, 2024

June 30, 2024

Four years ago, our esteemed colleague Mario Fonda-Bonardi wrote the prescient essay below when much of the legislative development juggernaut...

SM.a.r.t Column: The Up Zoning Scam (Part 2)

June 23, 2024

June 23, 2024

Last week’s SMart article  (https://smmirror.com/2024/06/sm-a-r-t-column-the-up-zoning-scam-part-1/)  discussed the ambitious 8895 units (including 6168 affordable units) that Santa Monica is required to...

SM.a.r.t Column: The Up Zoning Scam (Part 1)

June 16, 2024

June 16, 2024

Over the last few years, the State of California has mandated a massive upzoning of cities to create capacity for...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Shape Up – On Steroids

June 9, 2024

June 9, 2024

Nine years ago, SMa.r.t wrote a series of articles addressing the adaptive re-use of existing structures. We titled one “Shape...

SM.a.r.t Column: The Challenge of Running a City When City Staff Have Different Priorities

June 2, 2024

June 2, 2024

Living in a city has its perks, but it can be a real headache when the folks running the show...

SM.a.r.t. Column: A Path to Affordable Ownership in Santa Monica

May 27, 2024

May 27, 2024

[Note: our guest author today is Andres Drobny, a former Professor of Economics at the University of London, the former...

SM.a.r.t. Column: A Path Forward for Santa Monica: Part II

May 19, 2024

May 19, 2024

As referenced in Part I of this article, the state’s use of faulty statistics and forceful legislation has left a...

SM.a.r.t. Column: A Path Forward for Santa Monica: Part I

May 12, 2024

May 12, 2024

To quickly summarize, California grapples with an ongoing housing crisis spurred by state implementation of over 100 policies and mandates...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Where Will Our Huddled Masses Sleep? Navigating California’s Affordable Housing Mandates

May 5, 2024

May 5, 2024

Just as Lady Liberty beckons the “huddled masses” of immigrants to America, cities like Santa Monica have an ethical obligation...

SM.a.r.t Column: SMCLC SPEAKS

April 28, 2024

April 28, 2024

SMart (Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow) periodically invites guest columnists who have made a significant contribution to the...

SM.a.r.t Column: Building Modern Boxes Lacks Identity

April 21, 2024

April 21, 2024

In the relentless pursuit of modernity, cities worldwide have witnessed the rise of so-called architectural marvels in the form of...