June 20, 2024 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Coming-Of-Age in the 1970’s

By Nick Boyd

“20th Century Women,” a movie that takes place in 1979 Santa Barbara, is an evocative, insightful portrait depicting the issues of a 15-year-old boy named Jamie (newcomer Lucas Jade Zumann) living with his single mother Dorothea (Annette Bening). Also living at their house are Abbie (Greta Gerwig, an up-and-coming photographer) and William (Billy Crudup, a handyman.)

Jamie is an insecure, sensitive adolescent who his mom believes would benefit from female perspectives on things. Dorothea is a cynical, unhappy woman who has a negative outlook on love and relationships.

Jamie is close with a female his age named Julie (Elle Fanning), who he spends a lot of time with. While the relationship is a platonic one, Abbie tells Jamie at one point that if he ever wants to get further with Julie (in a romantic sense) that he must be assertive.

The movie explores issues of feminism, sexuality, and identity.

Both Dorothea and Abbie are very much into feminism and Abbie tries to impart this philosophy onto an impressionable Jamie, who as a result starts reading feminist books. Dorothea does not believe that she needs a man in her life to make her happy.

Jamie is at the age where he is ready to learn about the ins and outs of sexual relationships and this provides some of the comedy in the picture, as for example when he experiments with sexual terminology he has never used before. Abbie, after being diagnosed with cervical cancer, still wants to get sexually intimate with William, but makes it clear that she wants it to be no strings attached. William also finds that he has feelings for both Abbie and Dorothea, which complicates things.

Characters in the film struggle with identity issues. Jamie is not sure whether he wants to pursue a romantic relationship with Julie and is also not particularly masculine for someone his age. Abbie, after finding out what a cervical cancer diagnosis involves, is heartbroken, and yet does not want that to define her, as she continues to explore her artistic side. Then Julie, whose mother is a therapist, resorts to cutting herself at times and sleeping around with guys indiscriminately because of self-esteem and trust issues. Jamie is the only one Julie can truly feel comfortable around and confide in. Jamie and Julie’s relationship was the most believable in the picture and showed how close bonds can be beneficial in times of need.

As well-made as the movie is, I found some minor shortcomings. I thought the ending, which gives a glimpse of the characters in the future (both visually and through narration) tied things up too neatly. I would have preferred not knowing what the characters were like later on. Also, it did not seem believable that 15-year-old Jamie would have been able to be in a club; he clearly looked underage. Skateboarders rarely wore helmets in 1979, so I found it odd the movie would depict some doing so. Lastly, wine cooler drinks were not around in 1979, so when Jamie and Julie ask someone to buy them some, it seemed out of place.

The film is humorous and very well written, with Fanning, Crudup, Gerwig, Zumann, and Bening turning in strong work of depth and vulnerability, especially Zumann and Bening, who I found to be remarkable. Bening’s mannerisms ably convey a woman who is stressed out. Meanwhile, Zumann perfectly captures the awkwardness and low self-confidence of a teenager trying to find himself.

The movie effectively brings forth a sense of nostalgia and youthful innocence. The character’s longings become our longings. Also, the music in the picture plays a key role as it helps shape the characters. We can relate to the characters because they experience things that we can identify with on some level.

review

in Opinion
Related Posts

SM.a.r.t Column: The Up Zoning Scam (Part 1)

June 16, 2024

June 16, 2024

Over the last few years, the State of California has mandated a massive upzoning of cities to create capacity for...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Shape Up – On Steroids

June 9, 2024

June 9, 2024

Nine years ago, SMa.r.t wrote a series of articles addressing the adaptive re-use of existing structures. We titled one “Shape...

SM.a.r.t Column: The Challenge of Running a City When City Staff Have Different Priorities

June 2, 2024

June 2, 2024

Living in a city has its perks, but it can be a real headache when the folks running the show...

SM.a.r.t. Column: A Path to Affordable Ownership in Santa Monica

May 27, 2024

May 27, 2024

[Note: our guest author today is Andres Drobny, a former Professor of Economics at the University of London, the former...

SM.a.r.t. Column: A Path Forward for Santa Monica: Part II

May 19, 2024

May 19, 2024

As referenced in Part I of this article, the state’s use of faulty statistics and forceful legislation has left a...

SM.a.r.t. Column: A Path Forward for Santa Monica: Part I

May 12, 2024

May 12, 2024

To quickly summarize, California grapples with an ongoing housing crisis spurred by state implementation of over 100 policies and mandates...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Where Will Our Huddled Masses Sleep? Navigating California’s Affordable Housing Mandates

May 5, 2024

May 5, 2024

Just as Lady Liberty beckons the “huddled masses” of immigrants to America, cities like Santa Monica have an ethical obligation...

SM.a.r.t Column: SMCLC SPEAKS

April 28, 2024

April 28, 2024

SMart (Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow) periodically invites guest columnists who have made a significant contribution to the...

SM.a.r.t Column: Building Modern Boxes Lacks Identity

April 21, 2024

April 21, 2024

In the relentless pursuit of modernity, cities worldwide have witnessed the rise of so-called architectural marvels in the form of...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Santa Monica Needs Responsible Urban and Architectural Design

April 14, 2024

April 14, 2024

[SMa.r.t. note: Eight years ago, our highly esteemed and recently-passed colleague Ron Goldman documented his thoughts on the need for...

SM.a.r.t. Column: BLINK NOW!

April 7, 2024

April 7, 2024

Nine years ago, I wrote a column for SMa.r.t. titled SANTA MONICA: BEACH TOWN OR ‘DINGBAT’ CITY? (https://smdp.com/2015/05/09/santa-monica-beach-town-dingbat-city/)Here is the...

SM.a.r.t Column: ARB Courage (Part 2 of 2)

March 31, 2024

March 31, 2024

Last week we discussed the numerous flaws of the Gelson’s project as a perfect example of what not to do...

ARB Courage (Part 1 of 2)

March 24, 2024

March 24, 2024

On March 4, 2024, your ARB (Architectural Review Board) ruled in favor of the 521-unit Gelson’s Project at Ocean Park...

SM.a.r.t Column: Can California ARBs Balance Affordable Housing with Community Character in the Face of New Housing Laws?

March 17, 2024

March 17, 2024

By suggestion, I attended the March 4th ARB (Architectural Review Board) meeting that addressed the Gelson Lincoln Boulevard Project.  After...

S.M.a.r.t Column: On the Need for Safety

March 10, 2024

March 10, 2024

Earlier this week, in the dark pre-dawn hours, a pair of thugs covered in masks and hoodies burst into the...