December 12, 2024 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

With Racist Politics, You Have to Watch Your Language

By Steve Stajich

I’m sorry that you missed it. While not as dramatic or socially relevant as the events that precipitated it, there was a discussion at our dinner table earlier this week that was a roller-coaster ride with wild twists and turns… of language.

Specifically I presented my argument that one could, if so desired, paint white supremacists and the KKK and neo Nazis with the wide brush of “they’re stupid.” Others thought it made my discussion of these groups too reductive by insisting that the only thing powering the views and actions of said groups was their lack of intelligence: They are struggling to understand the world with such limited abilities of perception and lackluster educational backgrounds that you could justify labeling them “stupid.” You know, Nazis. In the year 2017. 72 years after the end of World War II… which I believe the Nazis lost.

So then we spent some time dissecting the word “ignorant,” which I believe implies that – with some real effort at learning and understanding – said ignorance could be removed. But what if people make a choice to ignore facts, science, the march forward of humankind and most of the rational and real world? And they hold on to their severely wrong-headed choice forever? Isn’t choosing or selecting ignorance… stupid?

I think by now you get some sense of how this debate went down and I’ll confess to you that one of my weapons in any argument is fatigue, which I hope isn’t setting in for you before I’m even halfway through this column. But yes, I like to wear down my opponents with analogies and examples that create friction when rubbed against their precepts. That, or we just agree to move on to dessert.

What we settled on, although I think the argument will come up again, is that I might be better off using the term “mentally defective” rather than “stupid.” It acknowledges that the “views” of white supremacist groups are bigoted and illogical to the degree that they strongly suggest some inability to mentally process, uh, much of anything. While I like the slightly more scientific sound of “mentally defective,” I immediately posited that it could be used in court as a defense. Specifically, would the man who drove his car into the crowd in Charlottesville plead mental defect and not be sentenced to a fuller charge of homicide/murder/assassination/terrorism…well, now you see how language matters in law.

What brought the entire discussion to our table was the event of news organizations referring to those involved in Charlottesville’s dark events that were not white supremacists as “anti-racist demonstrators.” (My hyphen, for clarity.) It was stunning: One simple adjustment of language and now there were two clashing “views” in Charlottesville: Racists and Non-Racists. The language was giving the white supremacists the benefit or credibility of expressing a “view,” such that anyone else there who didn’t share that view belonged to the “anti” view group. They were no longer simply decent people who didn’t want hateful white supremacy spew flowing through their city; they were “anti-racists.”

I might understand that in reporting on an event such as Charlottesville one had to make concessions in the interest of clarity. But is there a cumulative impact in adjusting language? Does the term “alt right” clarify or obfuscate what those on the “alt right” are really about? During the aforementioned dinner discussion, I wondered aloud if, in 2017, it was necessary for any woman to say she was “feminist” in order to frame comments about equal pay for equal work or discrimination against women. I do not expect black friends to feel as though they need to tell me they are “anti-racist.” I suppose more to my point, if black friends did feel as though they needed to tell me they were anti-racist I would feel I had failed them at some point.

Once again, the 21st century begets developments that seem to be about reclaiming what was once fully understood and agreed upon by all. We now have to argue and fight for clean water and air fit to breathe, which I suppose makes us “anti-destroying the Earth.” Public education, once the best and most visible representation of what the United States was about, is now another entitlement fighting for its life against a Secretary of Education who has never worked in a school or school system.

And now there are those determined to turn the crank on racism, defending statues representing the Confederacy and reviving that really groovy vibe of Nazi genocide, and it appears I must tell you I am an anti-racist because perhaps somehow you won’t know if I don’t identify myself.

Well, I won’t do that. Instead, please just assume I am anti all the things you’d assume I was anti. And not because I’m a “leftist”, which is another term of art showing up in reporting about decent people wanting to shut down Nazis. In the first few days of this past week, it became necessary for the company manufacturing Tiki patio lamps to release a statement clarifying that they deplored the views of white supremacists who marched toting their products. They had to make clear that they didn’t support Nazis… in 2017… 72 years after the end of World War II.

Steve Stajich, Columnist

<>Related Posts

SM.a.r.t Column: Climbing The Vertical Learning Curve

December 8, 2024

December 8, 2024

The city is facing a financial crisis, the roots of which stretch back decades but have been made worse by...

SM.a.r.t Column: It’s Time To Inspect Balconies

November 24, 2024

November 24, 2024

About nine years ago, a fifth-floor balcony in a Berkeley apartment building collapsed, tragically killing several students gathered on it...

S.M.a.r.t Column: Your City is Broke

November 18, 2024

November 18, 2024

On December 10, the new City council will be seated fresh from their dominant win in the recent elections. There...

SM.a.r.t Column: Moving Ahead to the Future

November 10, 2024

November 10, 2024

As we write this, the election results are still trickling in. We’ll leave the deep analysis to others, but the...

Opinion: Fact Check: Why Vote Yes on Measure QS

November 1, 2024

November 1, 2024

Despite living in a famously progressive region, Santa Monicans are not immune from the same political misinformation and disinformation that...

SM.a.r.t Column: Lack of Oversight and No Accountability

October 31, 2024

October 31, 2024

S.M.a.r.t. periodically invites guest columnists to write opinion articles on topics of particular interests to our readers. Below is an...

SM.a.r.t Column: “Help! I’ve Fallen, and I …!!”, Cries Santa Monica!

October 25, 2024

October 25, 2024

Maybe fallen, but slipping for sure from being a desirable beachfront community that served all equally, the local residents who...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Vote

October 13, 2024

October 13, 2024

In a polarized country or City every vote counts. Regardless of which side of any issue or candidate you support,...

SM.a.r.t Column: Fact-Checking Election-Season Windbaggery

October 6, 2024

October 6, 2024

Claim: The state is requiring Santa Monica to build 9,000 apartments.Answer: Partially true, partially false. Santa Monica has a pretty...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Public Safety and Traffic Enforcement Can Help Save Lives and Revitalize Santa Monica’s Economy

September 29, 2024

September 29, 2024

We wholeheartedly endorse the candidates below for Santa Monica City Council. Their leading campaign platform is for increased safety in...

SM.a.r.t Column: Crime in Santa Monica: A Growing Concern and the Need for Prioritizing Public Safety

September 22, 2024

September 22, 2024

By Michael Jolly Over the past six months, Santa Monica has experienced a concerning rise in crime, sparking heated discussions...

SM.a.r.t Column: Ten New Commandments

September 15, 2024

September 15, 2024

Starting last week,  the elementary school students of Louisiana will all face mandatory postings of the biblical Ten Commandments in...

SM.a.r.t Column: Santa Monica’s Next City Council

September 8, 2024

September 8, 2024

In the next general election, this November 5th, Santa Monica residents will be asked to vote their choices among an...

SM.a.r.t Column: Part II: The Affordability Crisis: Unmasking California’s RHNA Process and Its Role in Gentrification

September 2, 2024

September 2, 2024

Affordability: An Income and Available Asset Gap Issue, Not a Supply Issue (Last week’s article revealed how state mandates became...

SM.a.r.t Column: Part 1: The Affordability Crisis: Unmasking California’s RHNA Process and Its Role in Gentrification

August 26, 2024

August 26, 2024

In the world of economic policy, good intentions often pave the way to unintended consequences. Nowhere is this more evident...