August 14, 2022 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

SMar.t.-An Electrifying Proposal

A colleague, an ardent environmentalist and enthusiastic supporter of electric vehicles, recently tried to install an electric-car charger in the parking space of his companion’s apartment, as a gift to his friend. The equipment was to be installed at his own expense, following the building owner’s requirements. To his surprise, the landlord refused to let him install the charging device, citing the law.

Why was my colleague surprised? Because apartment building owners are required, by state law, to allow tenants to install electric car chargers. Those tenants must cover the cost of installing the chargers, and the insurance costs too. AB 2565, passed in 2014, was designed to encourage wider use of electric vehicles and protect building owners at the same time. But when my friend looked into it, he found a catch: the bill exempts rent-controlled buildings – and his companion lives in a rent-controlled apartment. So, alas, no charger for her.

Folks who want to exchange their gas-powered cars for cleaner electric vehicles have many choices now. The selection of vehicles is expanding quickly, at many price levels. And lightly-used electric cars are coming off their leases and being offered at low prices. Visit craigslist.com and you’ll find recent-model Nissan Leaf and Fiat 500e models for just a few thousand dollars. Anybody using an electric car for routine transportation, shopping or other needs, can charge their car’s battery for $25 a month or less, and maintenance costs are tiny. For people whose budgets are constrained, especially for many tenants in rent-controlled apartments, an electric car can be a good replacement for a gas-guzzling and polluting vehicle. The low operating and maintenance costs and much cleaner operation can make a big difference.

The great majority of Santa Monica renters live in rent-controlled apartments. The exemption in the state law can prevent these tenants from installing electric charging stations. There are also people in the community who want to use electric bicycles instead of their cars, and this exemption stops many of them from installing chargers in their buildings’ garages as well.

We have already seen some owners of rent-controlled buildings deny their tenants permission to install chargers. This exemption in the law helps prevent the adoption of two-wheeled and four-wheeled electric vehicles in our city, and along with it, a reduction in damaging emissions and the overall use of cars too.

Santa Monica has made strong efforts to encourage the use of electric vehicles. It recently passed new rules to speed up the permit process for electric charging stations. And the draft Electric Vehicle Action Plan, which calls for installing many new charging stations around the city, will soon be finished.

Back in May, 2014, at the request of Councilmember Kevin McKeown, City Council adopted a motion to support AB 2565, which was being considered in Sacramento at the time. Unfortunately, the City’s effort was thwarted in the final version of the state bill because it exempted rent-controlled buildings, which house over two-thirds of the tenants living in Santa Monica.

The City can do something about this, however, to fill the gap created by the state law – it can change the City’s Municipal Code to allow rent-controlled tenants to install chargers in their garages. An amended City law could require landlords of rent-controlled buildings, and of buildings with five parking spaces or less (rent controlled or not) to allow tenants to install electric charging stations at tenants’ expense. In exchange, it could stipulate that tenants must comply with the installation requirements of building owners. These conditions could include charger location, contractor qualifications, metering, and compliance with the building and electrical codes. It might even transfer ownership of the charging station to the building owner when the tenant leaves, for a reasonable fee.

An effort to change the Municipal Code to fill in the gap in the state law may present some legal challenges. Santa Monica has faced these kinds of obstacles before, and solved them with creativity and ingenuity. This may be an ideal project for City Council and the new City Attorney to take on, as it is likely to enjoy widespread support in the community, and little opposition.

A new law that allows tenants in rent-controlled buildings to install electric vehicle chargers would help everyone in this city. There’s nothing to be gained by waiting. Let’s get started now.

Zippy electric cars are an affordable way to get around, but charging is far from a breeze for rent-controlled tenants.
Photo: Palmen Fiat.

Daniel Jansenson, Architect, Santa Monica Building and Fire-Life Safety Commission for SMa.r.t. (Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow).

Thane Roberts AIA, Architect, Robert H. Taylor AIA, Ron Goldman FAIA, Mario Fonda-Bonardi AIA, Planning Commission, Daniel Jansenson Architect, Building and Fire-Life Safety Commission, Samuel Tolkin AIA, Phil Brock, Santa Monica Arts Commission

Related Posts

Column: Time to Crack Down on Vacant Homes’ Owners

August 12, 2022

August 12, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist ​​There is no doubt California has a housing shortage. That’s fact even in the wake of...

OpED: Santa Monica Police Officers Association on Downtown Presence

August 12, 2022

August 12, 2022

By The Santa Monica Police Officers Association Recently, there has been increased public dialogue around the topic of crime and...

Review: A Santa Monica Restaurant’s New Happy Hour is Top-Notch

August 10, 2022

August 10, 2022

By Dolores Quintana Birdie G’s in Santa Monica has a new Happy Hour and it is something special. For one...

SMa.r.t. Column: Ode to the Future of My City

August 8, 2022

August 8, 2022

How sad it is to journey to Santa Monica and I can’t find it.The open blue sky hides behind canyon...

SMa.r.t. Column: Why Native Gardens?

July 22, 2022

July 22, 2022

Voltaire said it best at the end of his 1759 novel  Candide: “We must cultivate our own garden”. This simple...

SMa.r.t. Column: We’re All Wet – Not!

July 15, 2022

July 15, 2022

Don’t you think that if you heard, or read, statements from controlling government agencies that said you were threatened by...

Affordability Answer: A New Tax on Housing Speculators?

July 8, 2022

July 8, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist The TV commercials and online ads are fast becoming ubiquitous: “We’ll buy your house as is,”...

SMar.t. Column: Has the Promenade Turned a Corner?

July 8, 2022

July 8, 2022

In large complex systems with dynamically balanced forces, it’s paradoxically often hard to tell when something has actually happened, For...

Column: Groundwater Law Has Not Stopped Subsidence

July 1, 2022

July 1, 2022

By Tom Elias Drive almost any road in the vast San Joaquin Valley and you’ll see irrigation pipes standing up...

SMa.r.t. Column: It’s Time to Look at the Facts of Santa Monica’s Housing History

June 30, 2022

June 30, 2022

The Narrative: Santa Monica’s decades-long housing construction “shortage”  The Narrative endlessly repeats the refrain that for decades Santa Monica has...

SMa.r.t. Column: The Mansionization of Santa Monica

June 17, 2022

June 17, 2022

Editor’s note: This column originally appeared in print in 2016.  In the 1980s, Santa Monica’s single family zoning code was...

OP-Ed Response to DTSM Board Chair Barry Snell and Plea to City Council Regarding Safety Ambassadors and Ambassador Program

June 14, 2022

June 14, 2022

I am responding to the OP-ED (dated June 7, 2022, Santa Monica Mirror) by City-appointed DTSM Board Member and now...

SMa.r.t. Column: Wheeling Electrically

June 9, 2022

June 9, 2022

A recent weekend visit to Dana Point, on the Orange County coastline, revealed a curious scene: dozens, if not hundreds...

Population Loss: New Era or Pandemic Glitch?

June 3, 2022

June 3, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist The numbers suggest a major change is underway in California. It would take a Nostradamus to...