May 28, 2024 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

SMa.r.t.-Our Data, Our Privacy: PART 1

By Daniel Jansenson

Park your car at Santa Monica Place. If you forget its location, you can use a “find your car” kiosk to type-in the car’s license plate. The kiosk will then display the car’s location on a map, along with a photo. Cameras and computers keep track of every car entering and leaving the structure.

Where is that information stored and how secure is it? Several years ago I contacted the City of Santa Monica and the parking management company with these questions, but to no avail.

Our lives are made more convenient all the time by companies and organizations that provide services and then gather data about our activities. Most of us accept this bargain. The cost seems minimal, the benefit welcome, and the intrusion barely visible. But as more of our lives get tracked and measured, the security of the data that is gathered, and the purposes for which it is used, become increasingly important. The recent scandals with Facebook and Cambridge Analytica are extreme examples of this problem.

In the past, private businesses and government gathered data separately. But today we’re beginning to see pressure to combine these public and private efforts, the beginnings of a sort of cooperation. One small local example: at a recent public meeting, an official with a popular and well-known electric-scooter rental business is said to have stated that the company shares data with Santa Monica City Hall. What data? He wouldn’t say, apparently (both this official and the City Manager’s office didn’t return our calls).

Another example: at a recent Santa Monica City Council meeting, an advocate for reducing the use of automobiles suggested to members of City Council, the notion of installing license-plate readers in all of the City’s parking structures to identify drivers who move their cars from one structure to another before their free 90 minutes are up. The technology is there. But the intent can evolve, as we see.

Now, these may appear to be small and insignificant examples. Who cares if they read our license plates? But they suggest an increasing pressure to use data that is, in fact, already being assembled. And as technology improves and penetrates more deeply into our physical environment, more information about us becomes available to private companies and the city’s government. Its impact may be multiplied if they share the information. Soon we may have wireless water meters. Will the information be secured, or available to any person who wants to know when the owners are away? What will happen when the City rolls out broadband internet service to many more residents – will their internet habits be kept private? What about our movements around the city – will they be tracked as we park in different places, or use those nifty electric scooters? The scooter company can already obtain private information about its users, not only from its app, but also from many online sources such as blogs and social media (as it explains on its Privacy web page). They are willing to sell their data to third parties. Will they share that information with the city – or vice versa? Individually, these bits of data may not be particularly worrisome. But when they are combined with other information – some of it from the outside–a more invasive picture emerges.

It is unclear, already today, what information is gathered by the City, what is done with it, who it is shared with and how safely it is being guarded by those to whom we entrust our safety. There is no Department of Data Transparency in City Hall.

Now, this is not to suggest that in real life our city government assembles information with bad intentions – far from it. But how this information is used is critically important.

parking lot
Capturing your car’s license plate may be helpful in locating your vehicle, but where does the data go?

 

 

 

 

 

Next week in Part 2: what City Council (and City Manager) can do to help preserve information privacy in Santa Monica.

Daniel Jansenson is an Architect, Building and Fire Life-Safety Commissioner.

SMa.r.t. (Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow) Daniel Jansenson Architect, Building and Fire Life-Safety Commissioner, Samuel Tolkin Architect, Robert H. Taylor AIA, Ron Goldman FAIA, Thane Roberts AIA, Mario Fonda-Bonardi AIA, Planning Commissioner, Phil Brock, Arts Commissioner.

Related Posts

SM.a.r.t. Column: A Path to Affordable Ownership in Santa Monica

May 27, 2024

May 27, 2024

[Note: our guest author today is Andres Drobny, a former Professor of Economics at the University of London, the former...

SM.a.r.t. Column: A Path Forward for Santa Monica: Part II

May 19, 2024

May 19, 2024

As referenced in Part I of this article, the state’s use of faulty statistics and forceful legislation has left a...

SM.a.r.t. Column: A Path Forward for Santa Monica: Part I

May 12, 2024

May 12, 2024

To quickly summarize, California grapples with an ongoing housing crisis spurred by state implementation of over 100 policies and mandates...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Where Will Our Huddled Masses Sleep? Navigating California’s Affordable Housing Mandates

May 5, 2024

May 5, 2024

Just as Lady Liberty beckons the “huddled masses” of immigrants to America, cities like Santa Monica have an ethical obligation...

SM.a.r.t Column: SMCLC SPEAKS

April 28, 2024

April 28, 2024

SMart (Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow) periodically invites guest columnists who have made a significant contribution to the...

SM.a.r.t Column: Building Modern Boxes Lacks Identity

April 21, 2024

April 21, 2024

In the relentless pursuit of modernity, cities worldwide have witnessed the rise of so-called architectural marvels in the form of...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Santa Monica Needs Responsible Urban and Architectural Design

April 14, 2024

April 14, 2024

[SMa.r.t. note: Eight years ago, our highly esteemed and recently-passed colleague Ron Goldman documented his thoughts on the need for...

SM.a.r.t. Column: BLINK NOW!

April 7, 2024

April 7, 2024

Nine years ago, I wrote a column for SMa.r.t. titled SANTA MONICA: BEACH TOWN OR ‘DINGBAT’ CITY? (https://smdp.com/2015/05/09/santa-monica-beach-town-dingbat-city/)Here is the...

SM.a.r.t Column: ARB Courage (Part 2 of 2)

March 31, 2024

March 31, 2024

Last week we discussed the numerous flaws of the Gelson’s project as a perfect example of what not to do...

ARB Courage (Part 1 of 2)

March 24, 2024

March 24, 2024

On March 4, 2024, your ARB (Architectural Review Board) ruled in favor of the 521-unit Gelson’s Project at Ocean Park...

SM.a.r.t Column: Can California ARBs Balance Affordable Housing with Community Character in the Face of New Housing Laws?

March 17, 2024

March 17, 2024

By suggestion, I attended the March 4th ARB (Architectural Review Board) meeting that addressed the Gelson Lincoln Boulevard Project.  After...

S.M.a.r.t Column: On the Need for Safety

March 10, 2024

March 10, 2024

Earlier this week, in the dark pre-dawn hours, a pair of thugs covered in masks and hoodies burst into the...

Film Review: The Oscar Landscape 2024

March 7, 2024

March 7, 2024

FILM REVIEWTHE OSCAR LANDSCAPE 2024A Look at the Choices – Academy Awards – March 10, 2024, at 5:00 p.m. on...

S.M.a.r.t Column: Five Saving Historic Santa Monica

March 3, 2024

March 3, 2024

Our beloved City is surrounded by many threats, from sea level rise to homelessness, to housing affordability, to cancerous overdevelopment,...

S.M.a.r.t Column: Gelson’s Looms Large

February 22, 2024

February 22, 2024

Our guest column this week is by SMCLC (the Santa Monica Coalition for a Livable City). SMCLC is a well-established...