June 23, 2021 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Attorney in Voting Rights Case “99 Percent Certain” City Will Change to District Elections

Special election also possible.

By Sam Catanzaro

Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Yvette M. Palazuelos has ruled in favor of the Pico Neighborhood Association in a voting rights case against the City of Santa Monica, putting the future of at-large elections at stake in the City. The decision, which was handed down on November 5 and filed on November 8, was released to the public on November 13, says at-large elections in Santa Monica are in violation of the California Voting Rights Act (CRVA).

Both sides will appear in court December 7 for a post-trial hearing to decide the appropriate solution for violating the CVRA.

While the City said they plan on appealing the ruling, R. Rex Parris of Parris Law Firm, an attorney representing the plaintiffs, told the Santa Monica Mirror that he is “99 percent certain” Santa Monica will change to district-based elections. 

“I’m 99 percent certain that they are going to turn it into districts,” Parris said. “This means there will be a change in the power structure of Santa Monica. It will mean that people who are not able to raise hundreds of hundreds of thousands of dollars will now be able to compete in an election.”

Depending on what is decided at the December 7 hearing, Parris told the Mirror that the plaintiffs will ask the City to hold a special election to elect new City Councilmembers.

“As soon as that order becomes final the people sitting in office are sitting there illegally,” Parris said. “We will be asking her to order a special election.” 

The case, Pico Neighborhood Association et al. v. City of Santa Monica, pitted voting rights advocates against the City of Santa Monica. The plaintiffs, led by resident Maria Loya, argue that the City’s at-large election system dilutes the Latino vote in City Council elections and is in violation of the 2002 California Voting Rights Act, which was passed to increase opportunities for Latinos and other minorities to elect representatives of their choice.

The City, however, argues that Latinos do enjoy success in City Council elections, pointing to Latino Councilmember Tony Vazquez, who is one out of seven councilmembers. Defense lawyers argue that this makes City Council 14.3 percent Latino, greater than the 13.1 percent of the City’s 89,736 residents who are Hispanic or Latino. The City also points to Mayor Pro-Tempore Gleam Davis, who testified during the trial that her adopted parents told her that her biological father is from Mexico.

The City also argues that district-based elections will not substantially enhance Latino voting power. In addition, they claim that at-large elections make sense for the 8.3 square mile city, pointing to the fact that voters have twice rejected district-based elections in 1972 and 2002.

In a press release Tuesday, attorneys for the City indicated that they plan on appealing Judge Palazuelos’ decision.

“We received today the court’s tentative ruling. We are disappointed that it contains no reasoning in support of the court’s decision, which we believe is based on an unjustified adoption of the plaintiffs’ misguided and unsupported view of the law. In accordance with the court’s order, we will file briefing on the issue of remedies. Once the court’s ruling is final, we plan to appeal, which will allow the California Court of Appeal to address the significant legal issues of first impression posed by this case,” said defense lawyer Theodore J. Boutrous Jr., Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP.

Plaintiff attorney Parris, however, is confident that his plaintiffs will prevail in the event of an appeal and that they appeal by the City is a misuse of taxpayers’ dollars.

“Nobody has ever prevailed against a judge who has ordered a district-wide election because that clearly is the favored policy of the law,” Parris said. “All they want to do is spend the taxpayer’s money in order to stay in office…If I was a citizen of Santa Monica, I would be outraged that they spent millions of dollars, and indicate that they will spend millions more, just so they can stay in office illegally”

The Santa Monica Mirror has reached out to the City asking how much they estimate will be spent on legal fees in an appeal, but they have not responded at the time of publishing.

Related Posts

Snap and Hulu Expanding Santa Monica Presence

June 22, 2021

June 22, 2021

Snapchat and Hulu, both based in Santa Monica, are expanding their footprints in the city. Learn more in this video...

Police Arrest Suspect in Downtown Santa Monica Homicide

June 22, 2021

June 22, 2021

27-year-old Long Beach man arrested as homicide suspect By Sam Catanzaro A suspect has been booked for murder in connection...

Two Suspects Arrested in Connection to Downtown Santa Monica Shooting

June 21, 2021

June 21, 2021

UPDATE: https://smmirror.com/2021/06/police-arrest-suspect-in-downtown-santa-monica-homicide/A man remains in custody for murder in connection to this incident, which was originally reported as a shooting...

Santa Monica Expected to Confirm Contract for New Interim City Manager

June 21, 2021

June 21, 2021

Former City Manager John Jalili expected assume interim post Friday  By Sam Catanzaro Santa Monica lawmakers are expected to approve...

Free Lunches Provided to School Aged Children at Virginia Ave Park: Santa Monica Beat – June 21, 2021

June 21, 2021

June 21, 2021

Local news and culture in under 5 minutes. * Free Lunches Provided to School Aged Children at Virginia Ave Park...

No Injuries Reported After Metro Train Collides With Vehicle in Santa Monica

June 21, 2021

June 21, 2021

A Metro E Line train collided with a car in Santa Monica Monday morning.  According to the Santa Monica Police...

Santa Monica Aligns Mask Orders with LA County

June 17, 2021

June 17, 2021

On June 15, Interim City Manager Lane Dilg signed the 37th supplement to align Santa Monica’s local emergency provisions with Los Angeles County...

Former Santa Monica Resident Sentenced to Federal Prison for Embezzling More Than $22 Million from Employer

June 17, 2021

June 17, 2021

A former executive at a Hollywood-based digital marketing company that represents influencers on Instagram and YouTube was sentenced recently to...

Edify TV: Tourism Returning to Santa Monica?

June 17, 2021

June 17, 2021

A busy Memorial Day weekend in which Santa Monica hotel occupancy rates reached their highest levels since the pandemic began...

Santa Monica College Cancels Fireworks Show, Main Street Parade Also Off

June 17, 2021

June 17, 2021

Firework shows in Marina del Rey and Pacific Palisades back this year By Sam Catanzaro Santa Monica College (SMC) has...

Summer Safety Tips When Hiking and Biking Outdoors

June 17, 2021

June 17, 2021

LAFD Captain Erik Scott gives us tips on staying safe while enjoying the mountains this summer. Brought to you by...

Crossroads Wins CIF and State Regionals

June 15, 2021

June 15, 2021

The Crossroads Varsity Boys Soccer Team had a stellar championship season starting with a true underdog story with CIF Division 6 Playoff...

Edify TV: Closing Expo Line Bike Path Gap?

June 15, 2021

June 15, 2021

Plans are in the works to close a frustrating gap in the Expo Line Bike Path. Learn more in this...

Markedly Different Reactions to Sheriff’s Plan to Clear Boardwalk Encampments

June 15, 2021

June 15, 2021

Plan to clear Boardwalk by Fourth of July met with applause, condemnation By Sam Catanzaro Los Angeles County Sheriff Alex...