September 30, 2020 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

The City Must Redo and Recirculate the EIR for the Massive Project at 4th and Arizona

Let’s just say it: This is Hines ALL OVER AGAIN! An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that doesn’t select qualified alternatives to the project that would have fewer environmental impacts so as to choose a better option.

The massive project currently proposed for 4th and Arizona would be only about 20 percent smaller than Santa Monica Place (10.5 acres) squeezed onto a 2.5 acre site. Like Hines, it has generated enormous public engagement. It’s been controversial from the beginning — it’s size turned on its side is as big as a football field, it’s mix of uses (hotel, office, residential, retail) — and whether these uses benefit the public so as to BE on public land.

Now comes the release of the environmental impact report known as an EIR, the essential purpose of which was to study the traffic and other environmental impacts of the project in relation to project alternatives that would reduce those impacts.

Beforehand, the consultants got extensive comments from the public on what to study from individuals, neighborhood groups, the Santa Monica Coalition for a Livable City (SMCLC), and SMa.r.t. (Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow), as well as responsible agencies, like CalTrans. CalTrans worried about the project’s crippling effect on the 4th and 5th Street and Lincoln Boulevard freeway exits, and the California Incline. Turns out CalTrans was right to be concerned.  The project would cripple the whole Downtown by generating anywhere from 4,000 – 5,000 daily car trips. And the non-park alternatives add anywhere from 3,000 to 5,800, more in one case because the consultant decided to study an alternative no one requested or deemed feasible – a huge residential alternative larger than the project with very little open space.

Photos: Courtesy 
A site plan for 4th and Arizona project as drawn by Rob Goldman.

Here’s the troubling part: The EIR is just as deficient in its critical selection and analysis of project alternatives as the Hines EIR was. This EIR: 1) studies alternatives that are designed to be so similar in impacts to the project’s height, square footage, FAR/lot coverage and mix of uses that they aren’t really alternatives; 2) insufficiently analyzes the impacts of the various alternatives so that no reasonable comparisons or differentiations among them can be made; and 3) fails to include the SMa.r.t. “reduced project” alternative that includes a 75 percent open space town square that the Council directed be studied.

While the EIR did look at two “public park” scenarios, the remainder of the project alternatives include heavily built-out scenarios that generate impacts similar to the project, and what’s worse, impacts that can’t be mitigated to insignificant levels.

How did this happen? The Council told the developer at the “float up” to reduce 100,000 SF of the project’s 200,000 SF of office use and then transfer most of what was lost back into the project’s other uses – hotel, residential, retail. This direction from Council and the City Manager appears to have pre-determined the project before an EIR was even done. The EIR appears to have followed suit and impermissibly poses alternatives that are too similar to the project to significantly reduce the impacts from those of the project.

This, of course, defeats the whole purpose of an EIR — to study project alternatives which would have fewer negative environmental impacts, such as water, traffic, parking and infrastructure to make a reasonable and better choice. The Council has to have the vital information as to what the superior project IS in order to make a sound decision. Equally important – so does the public — to be able to advocate for it, and to be able to weigh it against what the Council approves in determining whether to support or challenge the decision made.

A cost analysis of the project.

This is the most important project in our Downtown. Projects on public land necessitate the fullest range of environmental analysis as to impacts, disclosure as to impacts, and ways to lessen impacts, the greatest amount of accurate and complete information to facilitate public involvement, and ultimately a public vote. The City has already set that precedent for a public vote on the airport’s land uses – land that residents own. We expect no less here.

SMCLC and SMa.r.t call on the City to require the EIR to be revised and recirculated and to include alternatives that actually are of significantly reduced size and impacts to the project in addition to the overlooked SM.a.r.t “reduced project” proposal that should result in a reasonable project under CEQA that meets the City’s objectives under the Downtown Community Plan.

Stay tuned and we’ll update you on our next steps.

Guest Columnists are Diana Gordon, President of Santa Monica Coalition for a Livable City, and Mike Salazar, a local architect and preservationist. Both are longtime community activists. We thank Diana and Mike for their contribution this week.

By Diana Gordon J.D., and Mike Salazar, Architect for SMa.r.t.

(Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow)

Thane Roberts AIA, Architect, Robert H. Taylor AIA, Ron Goldman FAIA, Architect, Dan Jansenson, Architect, Building and Fire-Life Safety Commission, Samuel Tolkin Architect,

Phil Brock, Arts Commission. For previous articles see www.santamonicaarch.wordpress.com/writings.

Related Posts

BREAKING: Santa Monica City Council Approves Miramar Expansion

September 30, 2020

September 30, 2020

Project moves forward by 4-2 vote By Sam Catanzaro Santa Monica City Council has approved plans that have been in...

Santa Monica Walk to End Alzheimer’s

September 29, 2020

September 29, 2020

Alzheimer’s Association encouraging residents to walk in small groups amid COVID-19 The Alzheimer’s Association is inviting Santa Monica residents to...

Lawsuit Filed Against Plaza Development

September 28, 2020

September 28, 2020

Slow-growth group says City is violating Surplus Land Act By Sam Catanzaro A slow-growth group has filed a lawsuit to...

City Of Santa Monica Being Sued Over Proposed Plaza Project: Santa Monica Beat – September, 28, 2020

September 28, 2020

September 28, 2020

Local news and culture in under 5 minutes. * Santa Monica Being Sued Over Proposed Plaza Project. * LA Street...

Santa Monica Police Make Additional Arrests in Looting of REI

September 28, 2020

September 28, 2020

Marques Miles and Misty Jones arrested by Santa Monica Police Department Santa Monica police recently made additional arrests of two...

OpEd: The Miramar Project Will Be a New Architectural Jewel

September 27, 2020

September 27, 2020

The Miramar Hotel has been a central part of Santa Monica’s history and an integral part of the community for...

Edify TV: Trident Center Redevelopment

September 25, 2020

September 25, 2020

The Westside’s Trident Center is getting a major overhaul and new name as part of a flurry of development in...

Miramar Project to go Before City Council Tuesday

September 24, 2020

September 24, 2020

Councilmember Gleam Davis asks City Attorney whether she should rescue self from vote  By Sam Catanzaro  Santa Monica lawmakers will...

SMa.r.t. Column: Needed, A Heart Transplant

September 24, 2020

September 24, 2020

We have written about adaptive reuse in previous columns and have postulated that with proper incentives, the existing one, two...

Edify TV: Boulders Blocking Westside Encampment

September 24, 2020

September 24, 2020

City officials recently removed boulders placed on sidewalks by some Westside residents to prevent the formation of a homeless encampment....

Should Council Member Davis Recuse Herself From Voting? Santa Monica Beat – September, 24, 2020

September 24, 2020

September 24, 2020

Local news and culture in under 5 minutes. * Should Council Member Davis Recuse Herself From Voting? * Increases In...

SMC to Be Online for Winter and Spring 2021

September 24, 2020

September 24, 2020

College cites lack of available vaccine  By Sam Catanzaro Santa Monica College (SMC) has announced it will be delivering classes...

Edify TV: Al Fresco Program Ending?

September 24, 2020

September 24, 2020

During a COVID-19 pandemic many restaurants have found aid through the City of Los Angeles’ Al Fresco dining program, but...

Local Breweries Say They Have Been Unfairly Shuttered as County Passes Grant Program

September 24, 2020

September 24, 2020

$10 million grant program approved by Board of Supervisors  By Sam Catanzaro Will a $10 million grant program be enough...

Santa Monica Loses Vegan Restaurant

September 23, 2020

September 23, 2020

Space housing Santa Monica vegan restaurant Viva Vegan up for lease By Sam Catanzaro A vegan restaurant in Santa Monica...