January 27, 2022 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

So Now What?

The case was tried, the decision is in, and the City lost. The judge has ordered that all future City Council elections be district based in accordance with a seven-district map submitted by the Plaintiffs.

Now what?

Well, the city reiterated its intention to exhaust all appellate remedies to avoid having to give up the at large system found by the trial court to violate the California Voting Rights Act. It responded to the court’s invitation to submit its own draft map involving public process by stating it would undertake such a task only after all appellate rights have been exhausted. Meanwhile, based on that position, the voting rights violations the court found should continue on unchanged and unchallenged. No wonder the judge decided to make a specific order about elections and districts. I trust that she researched her authority to do so carefully before making it.

As a practical matter, this has been very costly litigation. In terms of dollars spent, estimates run from $6 to $12 million and the meter is still running. Plus, the City has now been labeled as a violator of voting rights. Ouch!

The initial decision to fight the suit may have been made in good faith, but the decision to continue the litigation should be evaluated. It is unlikely, however, that those who fought term limits (overwhelmingly favored by the electorate) are going to give up on something, which directly jeopardizes their chances of staying in power. Hence, the continuing challenge to the ruling coupled with the demand that even if they lose they still get to control the details of districting.

Why not come to the table now? Settle pending appeal. Better yet, settle before entry of judgment. Bring their gripes with the Plaintiff’s map to the table and/or propose a rapid public process to draw a new one both sides agree is acceptable Do the right thing.

Whether and how much public process is required if this case carries on is subject to legal interpretation and the subject of argument. That it will be time-consuming and result in further delay and cost is certain. Having faith in that process is difficult if it is going to be in the exclusive control of those who vehemently opposed district elections and scorched the earth trying to prevent them.

The court found violations and ordered a remedy. The City as of now intends to fight both. That is unfortunate for the Latinos in our community whose voting rights have been and continue to be violated and for the rest of us as well who support those rights.

I am a convert to the concept of district elections. I converted a few years ago for reasons other that those in the lawsuit. The two minute snippets of time grudgingly provided to members of the public to state their position is hardly meaningful in the face of a well prepared, directed and about to be if not already accepted by individual Council members staff report to the contrary. Resident voices were lost in a sea of development and lobbying and outside money interests when trying to get Council’s attention.

Districts aren’t independent city-states with autonomous control, so the Balkanization argument against them is ridiculous. All elected Council members will continue to work for the well being of the city as a whole. Including the Pico neighborhood, which really does seem to have been the dumping ground for things other neighborhoods were powerful enough to fight, we have far more common interests and issues than not. We are talking about districts having specific representatives responsible for bringing knowledge of how Council decisions affect their respective districts and what residents really want and need. How is that not the common good? Add in the reduction of cost to run for office and the lessening of outside influence in very local elections and you still have barely topped the list of benefits.

So now what? Do the right thing. Drop the appeal. Bring on district elections.

Guest Columnist Maryanne LaGuardia is a Santa Monica Recreation & Parks Commissioner, a longtime community activist and a member of the California Bar. We thank Maryanne for her contribution this week.

By Maryanne LaGuardia J.D. for SMart (Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow)

Thane Roberts AIA, Architect, Robert H. Taylor AIA, Ron Goldman FAIA, Architect, Dan Jansenson, Architect, Building and Fire-Life Safety Commission, Samuel Tolkin Architect, Mario Fonda-Bonardi, AIA, Planning Commissioner, Phil Brock, Santa Monica Arts Commission. For previous articles see www.santamonicaarch.wordpress.com/writing

Related Posts

LA Citycouncilmember Mike Bonin Will Not Seek Reelection

January 26, 2022

January 26, 2022

Councilmember cites chronic depression in Wednesday announcement By Sam Catanzaro Los Angeles City Councilmember Mike Bonin has announced that he...

Current Progress of Permanent Veteran Housing on The West LA VA Campus

January 26, 2022

January 26, 2022

VA representatives give a tour of the current progress and future plans for permanent veteran housing on the West LA...

Pandemic Propels Lifelong Educators to Open New Preschool in the Palisades!

January 25, 2022

January 25, 2022

By Susan Payne Look out, Palisades: Two educators with more than 50 years combined experience are opening a new preschool...

Santa Monica Named LEED Platinum City

January 25, 2022

January 25, 2022

First city to achieve Platinum level certification in LEED for Cities Version 4.1.  By Sam Catanzaro The U.S. Green Building...

Arnold Schwarzenegger Involved in Brentwood Crash

January 24, 2022

January 24, 2022

No injuries reported in Friday incident By Sam Catanzaro Arnold Schwarzenegger was involved in a multi-vehicle crash in Brentwood Friday. ...

Report Finds That Santa Monica Spends Nearly $5 Million on Homeless Outreach

January 24, 2022

January 24, 2022

By Dolores Quintana A new report shows that the City of Santa Monica spends nearly $5 million on homeless outreach...

Homeless Man Violently Attacks Two Residents With Ties To City Council: Santa Monica Beat – January 24th, 2022

January 24, 2022

January 24, 2022

Local news and culture in under 5 minutes.*  Homeless Man Violently Attacks Two Residents With Ties To City Council*  Families...

City Breaks Ground on Water Self-Sufficiency Project

January 24, 2022

January 24, 2022

City Representative Sunny Wang explains what the new improvements to the Arcadia Water Treatment Plant will mean for local residents..Video...

Euro Investment Firm Buys Santa Monica Whole Foods Property for Over $50 Million

January 24, 2022

January 24, 2022

Whole Foods Santa Monica property sold to Deka Group By Dolores Quintana One of Europe’s largest investment firms has purchased...

Santa Monica’s Future: Will Developers or Residents Rule? – Part 3 Our Boulevards

January 21, 2022

January 21, 2022

This is the 3rd of a 5 part article outlining serious issues that Santa Monica residents and the City Council...

Preliminary Injunction Granted to Halt Demolition Of Parking Structure 3

January 21, 2022

January 21, 2022

January 24 hearing set following LA Superior Court Judge ruling By Dolores Quintana The Santa Monica Bayside Owners Association’s (SMBOA)...

Letter to the Editor: A Solution for Drivers and Mountain Lions Alike

January 21, 2022

January 21, 2022

The recent story, Local Mountain Lions Show First Reproductive Effects of Inbreeding, highlights a study that found mountain lions in...

Westside Home Prices Rising?

January 21, 2022

January 21, 2022

Redfin report shows 11.1 percent increase in median home prices By Dolores Quintana Are Westside home prices rising?  On the...

Opinion: Housing Battle Heats up in Signature Season

January 21, 2022

January 21, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist Even before a proposed homeowner-inspired measure aiming to restore full zoning powers to local governments hit...

Film Review: “Don’t Look Up”

January 21, 2022

January 21, 2022

FILM REVIEWDON’T LOOK UPRated R138 MinutesReleased December 24th As with other Adam McKay movies, such as Vice and The Big...