June 26, 2022 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Open Space… Is There Any Left?

Yes there is. Small as it is, there is about 2.5 acres in the heart of downtown waiting to be designed as a public park/plaza. Well, maybe. Our city has designed and approved a Downtown Community Plan (DCP), recently adopted, that doesn’t have a requirement for a park or plaza, and the potential open space area of public land at 4th/5th streets and Arizona Avenue is currently destined, it seems, to be a twelve-story commercial development with the blessing of our current City Council, unless the residents find a way to stop the proposed development.

It’s not yet a done deal, but considering that it has been in the works before the Planning Commission and City Council on several occasions over the last four years or so, and continues to be active in the approval process, we (the residents) better become a loud squeaky wheel or it will be a done deal, and there is no other similar publicly owned site downtown. Why should we, the residents, allow the City to give our public land to a private developer for their profit? We shouldn’t, just as we shouldn’t have allowed the City to give another 2 acres or so of public land at the Civic Center to Santa Monica College (SMC) for a privately run day care center for $1.00/ year rent – yes, one dollar per year for the next 55 years. Gratefully, it looks like the Coastal Commission just this week approved the sports playing field at the Civic Center and construction may begin this summer. Thanks to a very loud vocal public demand over a much too long a period of time. 

There is another large open parcel of land that the City has been diligently picking at and trying to close down, and that is our Santa Monica airport, SMO. Those who have supported its closure argue, and attempt to convince others, that it will become a 227-acre park. How many actually believe that those 227 acres, which incidentally is the same amount of land area that comprises the entirety of downtown at 228 acres, will become a park, when there is no indication that the City will even yield 2.5 acres of our land for a park/plaza in the downtown area and the effort it took to get one sports field. The airport is at least open land as is and produces revenue for the City.

The City commissioned a report by The Rand Corp. (the employees of which will be the likely users of the child care center at the Civic Center on our land) in 2012 to study airport land use titled ”Santa Monica Municipal Airport (SMO) Options for the Future” (https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/documented_briefings/2012/RAND_DB639.pdf). It includes some insight to its potential future use. For example it says, “The SMO campus offers appropriate space and ample parking space for an incubator in reasonable proximity to downtown Santa Monica and UCLA. It would be possible at modest cost to recycle or upgrade an existing older building on the nonaviation land at SMO to start and to add space as needed. Although some people spoke to us of eventually needing millions of square feet, it seems possible…” (page 31, emphasis added). Or this, “A formal affiliation may be appropriate between an incubator and SMC, which is already at the airport on the Bundy Campus. Several senior officers of the college were consulted in the course of our study, and they were enthusiastic about linking a potential incubator with their own growing focus on economic development and the training of a more technically educated and sophisticated workforce. An appropriate role for SMC to support the incubator is specialized technical training of the workforce at the incubator.” (page 32). Insightful hints at the potential future use of that land, and one should know that SMC, for example, process plans only thru the Office of the State Architect and are exempt from City Building or Planning codes, and zoning regulations. Note too that, per Measure LC, education and recreational uses can be approved on the airport land by the council without a public vote.

So what other open space is available to residents to maintain and enhance our, and the region’s, quality of life? The Open Space Element describes the State definition of “open space” as “any area of land or water which is essentially unimproved and devoted to an open space use as defined in this section, and which is designated on a local, regional, or state open space plan as any of the following:… and lists several categories, but the one that fits Santa Monica is the category of open space for the purposes of outdoor recreation. Included in that definition is “walking along tree lined streets…plazas and community gathering places…” (emphasis added). Hmmm, makes one think how appropriate for our public land at 4th/5th streets and Arizona Avenue.

Also included in The Open Space Element as “open space” are streets, and one might assume that includes alleys. As a personal observation, I have not seen a resurfacing or cleaning of the two allies near me in Ocean Park in more than 35 years. It does seem if alleys and streets are a part of our Open Space Element then they should be maintained in a fashion that helps “maintain and enhance our quality of life”. Having been involved in working on three street improvement designs I am aware the City is moving in the right direction in some respects in some locations, but to ignore the obvious use of 4th/5th and Arizona as a park/plaza in the heart of downtown, on our city land, is unconscionable and another misuse of our limited resources if given to a private developer.

Bob Taylor, AIA for SMa.r.t. (Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow)

Sam Tolkin, Architect; Dan Jansenson, Architect Building & Fire-Life Safety Commissioner; Thane Roberts, Architect; Ron Goldman, FAIA Architect; Robert H. Taylor, AIA Architect;   Mario Fonda-Bonardi, AIA Architect; Planning Commissioner

in Opinion
Related Posts

SMa.r.t. Column: The Mansionization of Santa Monica

June 17, 2022

June 17, 2022

Editor’s note: This column originally appeared in print in 2016.  In the 1980s, Santa Monica’s single family zoning code was...

OP-Ed Response to DTSM Board Chair Barry Snell and Plea to City Council Regarding Safety Ambassadors and Ambassador Program

June 14, 2022

June 14, 2022

I am responding to the OP-ED (dated June 7, 2022, Santa Monica Mirror) by City-appointed DTSM Board Member and now...

SMa.r.t. Column: Wheeling Electrically

June 9, 2022

June 9, 2022

A recent weekend visit to Dana Point, on the Orange County coastline, revealed a curious scene: dozens, if not hundreds...

Population Loss: New Era or Pandemic Glitch?

June 3, 2022

June 3, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist The numbers suggest a major change is underway in California. It would take a Nostradamus to...

SMa.r.t. Column: The Sound of Silence Is Big & Tall

June 3, 2022

June 3, 2022

All too often these days we find ourselves wondering how we could have been so correct about so many planning...

OP-Ed: DTSM Chair Barry Snell on Safety Ambassadors

June 2, 2022

June 2, 2022

By Barry Snell Chair, Downtown Santa Monica, Inc. Board of Directors  The Downtown Santa Monica, Inc. (DTSM) Board of Directors...

Affordable Spaces for Small Business

May 27, 2022

May 27, 2022

Los Angeles County recently proposed a program providing financial incentives for certain “Legacy” family businesses in their original historical location....

​​Doubt Removed: Oil Refiners Gouging Us

May 23, 2022

May 23, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist There was some room for doubt back in February, when gasoline prices rose precipitously: Until the...

Is the Big Housing Crunch Mostly Fiction?

May 20, 2022

May 20, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist In some parts of California, there is definitely a housing crunch: small supplies of homes for...

Is Gelson’s Our Future? Bigger Is Not Better & Not Necessary! – Part 2

May 20, 2022

May 20, 2022

The dream of our beachfront city is about to become a nightmare! Just imagine a tsunami of these projects washing...

Column From Santa Monica Mayor Himmelrich: We Walk the Talk

May 12, 2022

May 12, 2022

By Sue Himmelrich, Santa Moncia Mayor  I like the SMa.r.t. architects. I often agree with them. But in allowing Mark...

Is Gelson’s Our Future? Bigger Is Not Better!

May 12, 2022

May 12, 2022

It’s appalling to see what’s happening in our city – projects recently built or about to be approved – in...

Renting Your Second Home

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

If you are among the many Americans who own a second home that you occasionally use as a vacation getaway,...

Column: Cities Fight to Maintain Distinctive Characters

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist Anyone who knows California well will realize that Palo Alto does not look much like nearby...

SMa.r.t. Column: Gelson’s, Boxed-In

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

This week we are re-visiting an article from 2018 regarding the Miramar project, by simply replacing the word “Miramar” with...