December 4, 2020 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Small Businesses and the Development Challenge

The Architectural Review Board met this week to review several apartment projects in different parts of downtown, including 1238 7th Street–6 stories, 37 units and no parking. The staff report says:

“The project site is located along the west side of 7th Street and is currently a vacant lot.” (see the staff report here: https://tinyurl.com/y579sqhd).

Leave aside for now any discussion of density, water, lack of parking and other issues. At first glance the notion of filling an empty lot with a building containing affordable housing sounds reasonable: nobody is being displaced, the new building’s design might be construed (by some) as interesting, and the added fillip of a cool hipster cafe on the ground floor is–not to mix metaphors–the cherry on top. What’s not to like? An urbanista’s dream.

One small fly in the ointment. The lot is not vacant. The staff report is wrong. Actually there is a one-story building in that spot, currently occupied by several small, and active businesses of a type that is very desirable in our town. There’s a physical therapist, a swimming school, a design firm, an educational company that helps students with writing and math and a product-prototyping firm. These are clean industries that employ a significant number of skilled people. What’s more, the building is of a modest scale that fits with the surrounding buildings and the nearby community.

Now, obviously, with the recent increases in land values, such a small building is a prime candidate for replacement (at least from a developer’s viewpoint). It is also clear, now, that the City appears to be uninterested in the kind of land use represented by the existing building, because no provision appears to have been made for the small, local businesses that will soon be displaced.

Someone obviously made a mistake, accidentally or not, by saying the lot is vacant. If the lot was occupied by a small apartment building full of low-income tenants, we would certainly have heard about that in the staff report. Whoever decided to describe this lot as vacant–and to be clear, this may not have been the author of the staff report–was either unaware of the lot’s actual status, or else engaged in a minor fib. Which is worse? Perhaps that person reasoned that it would paint the new project favorably in the public eye. Which sounds better: “the new building will displace a group of long-time small businesses,” or “the new building will replace a vacant lot?” 

Deliberate or not, the presentation of this project both to the public and the Architectural Review Board as an urban infill housing project with no real-world downside is a distortion of what will actually take place on that property.

We ask, these days, why small businesses, a group without effective institutional representation, keep disappearing from our city. With this project we see that any discussion of this issue–small local businesses displaced by development and facing higher rents in new buildings–is completely bypassed by the casually-made errors, or perhaps even falsehoods, that accompany much development in this town. It is unimportant who was responsible for this project’s public description. Both the developer and the staff know that this property is currently occupied by a building housing several longtime small, local businesses. 

The improper account of the property’s current status covers up a basic fact that could have led to an important public discussion of the type this community badly needs right now. The city has provided plenty of profitable incentives for developers to build such projects in the city. Should the city also require new projects to provide space for small businesses displaced by new construction, perhaps even with a break in the rent? We are unable to have these public conversations when projects are misrepresented to the public without explaining the actual circumstances surrounding their construction. Even small mistakes or fibs can be important, as we see here.

All of these businesses in the current building–the educational learning-help firm, the physical therapist, the swimming school, the design company and the product-prototyping firm will have to go away, apparently to be replaced by yet another hipster cafe when the new building is complete. These kinds of businesses are prime examples of the finely-grained texture of a healthy, diverse and sustainable community. We let them go at our peril.

Daniel Jansenson, Architect, Building and Fire-Life Safety Commission for SMa.r.t.

Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow: Thane Roberts, Architect, Robert H. Taylor AIA, Ron Goldman FAIA, Architect, Dan Jansenson, Architect, Building and Fire-Life Safety Commission, Samuel Tolkin Architect, Mario Fonda-Bonardi, AIA, Planning Commission, Phil Brock, Santa Monica Arts Commission. 

Related Posts

Santa Monica Resident Sharon Gillerman Dies At Age 60: Santa Monica Beat – December, 3, 2020

December 3, 2020

December 3, 2020

Local news and culture in under 5 minutes. * Santa Monica Resident Sharon Gillerman Dies At Age 60 * Grant...

Edify TV: Culver City Food Hall Opens

December 3, 2020

December 3, 2020

A highly-anticipated food destination has opened in Culver City in a historic building. Learn more in this video made possible...

Edify TV: Restaurant Grant Program Not Enough?

December 3, 2020

December 3, 2020

To help struggling restaurants, LA County is rolling out a grant program. But with most restaurants not qualifying, will it...

Vartan Abgaryan Restaurant Closes 18-Months After Opening

December 3, 2020

December 3, 2020

Vartan Abgaryan says Abbot Kinney Boulevard restaurant Yours Truly will not be reopening By Kerry Slater An acclaimed Westside restaurant...

Captain of Dive Boat That Killed 2 Santa Monicans and 32 Other People Indicted

December 2, 2020

December 2, 2020

Jerry Nehl Boylan indicted by a federal grand jury on 34 counts of seaman’s manslaughter By Sam Catanzaro The captain...

Video: Local Gym Owners File Lawsuit

December 1, 2020

December 1, 2020

Local gym owners are seeking a relaxation of health orders aimed at stemming the spread of the coronavirus in a...

Supervisor Sheila Kuehl Eats at Santa Monica Restaurant Hours After Voting to Ban Outdoor Dining

December 1, 2020

December 1, 2020

LA County Supervisor dines at Il Forno in Santa Monica last Tuesday By Sam Catanzaro LA County Supervisor Sheila Kuehl,...

Help Those in Need in The Salvation Army Santa Monica’s Holiday Auction

December 1, 2020

December 1, 2020

Bid on a range of locally curated goods until December 6 By Sam Catanzaro Help those in need on the...

Newsom Curfew Protest at Santa Monica Pier

November 30, 2020

November 30, 2020

Around 80 people protest at Santa Monica Pier over the weekend By Sam Catanzaro Around 80 people gathered at Santa...

Santa Monica Canine Officer Boris Retires: Santa Monica Beat – November, 30, 2020

November 30, 2020

November 30, 2020

Local news and culture in under 5 minutes. * Santa Monica Canine Officer Boris Retires * George Gascon Can Not...

Edify TV: Budget Cuts Leading to More Beach Pollution

November 30, 2020

November 30, 2020

Local budget cuts are leading to more trash and pollution on Westside beaches according to environmental experts. Learn more in...

City of Santa Monica Closes Playgrounds

November 30, 2020

November 30, 2020

Public playgrounds close, farmers market occupancy limited By Sam Catanzaro Santa Monica officials have closed public playgrounds as COVID-19 spread...

Edify TV: 22-Story Office Building Planned for Westside

November 29, 2020

November 29, 2020

Learn about plans to bring a 22-story office building to the Westside in this video made possible by Santa Monica College.

Santa Monica Office Campus Bought for $166M by Northwestern Mutual

November 29, 2020

November 29, 2020

Four-building complex currently leased to Universal Music Group & Illumination Entertainment By Toi Creel Northwestern Mutual, a financial services institution,...