June 22, 2024 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Is Our City Riding a Trojan Horse – Part 2

As discussed in Part 1 of our article two weeks ago (https://smmirror.com/2019/12/is-our-city-council-riding-a-trojan-horse), Santa Monica will be required by state law to add 9,000 units, including 6,900 affordable within 8 years – increasing our current population 20%! But our city’s track record to date is not stellar – doubling the goal of market-rate housing while requiring 30% affordable units, but only realizing 10%.

The City’s kneejerk reaction, not yet adopted, is to “up-zone” by adding 2 stories of height while removing barriers to development in order to accommodate the 9,000 units – both foolhardy and unnecessary. In a recent Council meeting, expressions ranged from “interested in removing any restrictions in the Bergamot area” to “it’s these kinds of anti-growth and exclusionary policies that have gotten us into the mess we’re in!”

Is it really the Council’s intention to drastically up-zone, allowing developers to build large enough in order to include the low-income units required, while along the way enriching themselves for the election process? But can we produce 9,000 units in the next 8 years without adding 2 stories of height throughout the city, without increasing 4 & 6 story limits to 6 & 8 stories along the boulevards and increasing 6-8 stories to 8-10 stories in our downtown? C’mon Council there is substantial capacity to add both housing and commercial in far more creative ways. And building low-rise instead of building higher is less costly while maintaining our beachfront character. Council, start thinking outside the box!

Is it really the Council’s intention to drastically up-zone, allowing developers to build large enough in order to include the low-income units required, while along the way enriching themselves for the election process?

Ron Goldman FAIA
for SMa.r.t.

Vacancies & Adaptive Re-Use:

Could our 8% vacancy account for a sizeable portion of this requirement? Or consider adaptive re-use of existing buildings! As my colleague Dan Jansenson suggested – being forced by state law could possibly allow us to use eminent domain to condemn entire buildings for adaptive re-use or buildings being remodeled could be required to convert a portion for housing. When you consider the energy used in material extraction and construction, over 30% of global fuel consumption, maybe we should stop demolishing so much of our built environment and start seeing existing buildings as an important resource in the natural environment.

Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU’s)

There are 9,800 single family homes in Santa Monica. It is not unrealistic to assume 10% of these homes could provide 980 of the 9,000 units required, especially when considering the major revisions to state law governing ADU’s which went into affect this year. These changes include increased area, decreased setbacks, limited permit processing time, and up to 3 dwellings on a single property. With ADU’s being less costly to build, the land being free and no elevators or subterranean parking, 200 ADU’s per year or 1,600 over the 8 years is quite realistic.

City-Owned Property

Our city government is by far the largest landowner with 243 acres of available land – the Big Blue Bus yard, the Bergamot city yards, and SMO. Using 20% of these areas could provide all of the 6,900 affordable units in a terraced 3 story garden apartment environment.

However, when you consider the city has one of the lowest green space ratios of any city, it may be more beneficial to put all 6,900 affordable units on 25-30% of SMO. This would still leave 70-75% of the airport area available for emergency helicopter aviation, city yards, a park, electric buses, and/or SMC expansion. And this would then enable use of the two 8 acre parcels (BBB and city yards) to become parks, centrally located within our city, while causing less disruption of infrastructure throughout the city.

Eight Boulevards

We also have a unique opportunity to not only increase housing but also enhance the character of our boulevards. One story commercial buildings with their display windows and entry doors hugging the sidewalks along with their abutting surface asphalt parking lots could transition into meandering sidewalks, courtyards, landscape, trellises, and terraced architecture. These would become neighborhood activity centers with ground floor commercial and 2 residential floors opening onto terraced courtyards – similar to Santa Monica’s history of courtyard housing instead of 6-8 story block buildings. These redeveloped areas could provide up to 6,000 housing units calculated at a ratio of 15% each of studios and 3 bedroom units and 35% of 1’s and 2’s.

Illustrated are 3 of many possible designs on 1/2, 3/4, and full blocks with floor area ratios of 1.5 – 2.25. Existing property owners could either lead or participate in the redevelopment – and be reimbursed for 2 years of lost income while under construction and then realize a threefold increase in profit. At 1.5 – 2.25 FAR and taking into account the 2 years of lost income, the cost of construction, permit and legal fees, etc., the redeveloped project shows an r.o.i. in excess of 11%! To incentivize this transition, the city could reduce processing time, permit costs, or property taxes for a period of time.

Downtown

In the downtown area, there is also a substantial number of one-story commercial buildings and surface parking that could also add up to 3,000 units in terraced 4-story, 2.0 FAR designs – without the need to increase heights to 8 and 10 stories.

And while we’re busy adding housing, what about addressing a substantial need for green space! Picture turning existing downtown sideyards and alleys into a network of shop-lined pedestrian arcades leading to a grand piazza at 4th and Arizona – one that both residents and visitors can enjoy for decades.

Summary

Our City Council has no overall strategy. They pride themselves solely on rent control. How about ALSO taking pride in your environment which is fast being compromised. Does this increased density by adding 2 stories of height serve our community? Or will this create economic, physical and mobility havoc? There are multiple answers to this 9,000 unit requirement without simply adding 2 stories.

But unfortunately, it appears our city government is not competent enough to oversee creating 9,000 units, unless possibly at a single site at the airport. Alternatively, we can choose to fight state law, but that’s probably a lost cause along with substantial daily economic penalties.

And how is this added density going to affect infrastructure – water, power, schools, fire, police? And what is the ancillary cost for a decade of torn up streets and inadequate electrical supply, etc? Increasing population 20% will also require increasing infrastructure by 20%. We will need water, traffic and emergency plans along with 9,000 additional units. And where is the school to house the children of these 9,000 units? Where is the water coming from? I’d be surprised if our current water plan includes the addition of 9,000 units. We need a comprehensive study – we need an overall master plan before we start increasing our population 20%!!

And, as stated previously, it is criminal to continue losing our heritage of courtyard housing with block-like building façades, especially when there is no compelling reason to do so other than simple greed in concert with dependence on re-elections funds. We need to seriously consider “form based codes” to prevent the increasing “block-like” character permeating our city.

Santa Monica takes pride in being a progressive community – but maybe this is only accomplished in public relations? Santa Monica, you can do a lot better if you just literally look “outside the box.” I’m certain there are other solutions while maintaining, and even enhancing, Santa Monica’s beachfront scale and environment. This can be a win-win-win for the City, the developers, and the residents!!!

Ron Goldman FAIA
for SMa.r.t. (Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow)

Thane Roberts, Architect, Robert H. Taylor AIA, Ron Goldman FAIA, Dan Jansenson, Architect, Building and Fire-Life Safety Commission, Samuel Tolkin Architect, Mario Fonda-Bonardi, AIA, Planning Commissioner, Phil Brock, Santa Monica Arts Commission. For previous articles see www.santamonicaarch.wordpress.com/writings.

Related Posts

LA County Issues Ocean Water Use Warning for Several Beaches on the First Day of Summer

June 21, 2024

June 21, 2024

Elevated Bacterial Levels Prompt Health Advisory for Popular Coastal Spots Sadly, on the first day of Summer, the Los Angeles...

THIS WEEKEND: “Venice Summer Fest 2024” Will Celebrate Local Artists, Brands, and Designers

June 21, 2024

June 21, 2024

Over 400 Artists Will Exhibit and Sell Their Original Creations  The Venice Summer Fest 2024 will take place on Saturday,...

This Palisadian Will Be the Youngest Ever U.S. Olympian in Beach Volleyball

June 21, 2024

June 21, 2024

Miles Partain, 22, Is One of Several Olympians That Came Out of Pali High By Zach Armstrong Palisadian talent will represent...

(Video) Sport Fishing and Whale Watching on the Pacific Offered by MDR Sportfishing

June 20, 2024

June 20, 2024

Located Out of Marina del Rey, More Information Can Be Found at mdrsf.com @smmirrornews Operating out of Marina del Rey,...

Roman-Style Pizza Chain Opens on Main Street

June 20, 2024

June 20, 2024

The Chain’s Menu Boasts Fresh Ingredients for Its Variety of Tradition, Gluten-Free and Vegan Options By Zach Armstrong Today on...

Sci Fi Museum’s Lease Gets Terminated at Former Sears Building

June 20, 2024

June 20, 2024

The News Comes as a Slew of Controversies Surround the Museum and Its Founder By Zach Armstrong Amid tumultuous setbacks...

Pride-Colored Towers Vandalized During Pride Month for Two Straight Years in Palisades

June 20, 2024

June 20, 2024

L.A. County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath Stated That the Graffiti Will Be Removed By Zach Armstrong For two consecutive years, pride-colored lifeguard...

Film Review: Hit Man

June 19, 2024

June 19, 2024

FILM REVIEWHit ManRated R115 MinutesLimited run in theatres May 24th – June 7th, Released June 7th on Netflix Based on...

What to Expect at This Year’s “Pier 360 Beach Festival”

June 19, 2024

June 19, 2024

The Festival Will Honor Jeff Ho, Iconic Surfboard Shaper and Founder of the Zephyr Surf Team, and Kathy Kohner Zuckerman,...

Judge Blocks Barrington Plaza Evictions, Citing Legal Violations

June 19, 2024

June 19, 2024

Owner Douglas Emmett Inc. Sought to Evict Nearly 600 Tenants Last Year, Citing Safety Upgrades The eviction of hundreds of...

Yoga Gurus Sentenced for Defrauding Malibu Doctor

June 19, 2024

June 19, 2024

Dr. Sawusch Had a Successful Medical Practice in Pacific Palisades and Amassed Significant Wealth Through Investments A federal judge sentenced...

Thief Steals $4K of Jewelry from 3rd Street Promenade Store

June 18, 2024

June 18, 2024

The Owner Says a Similar “Smash-And-Grab” Incident Took Place Earlier This Year By Zach Armstrong A Ring camera placed inside...

Homeless Man Arrested in Santa Monica for Burglary and Arson

June 18, 2024

June 18, 2024

Suspect Faces Multiple Charges After Incidents Patrol officers responded to a commercial burglary call on Saturday, May 25, at approximately...

Baby Blues BBQ Reopens in Venice Nearly Two Years After Devastating Fire

June 18, 2024

June 18, 2024

The Eatery Has Been Featured on Diners, Drive-Ins & Dives, and the Food Network By Zach Armstrong Almost two years after...

Tech Entrepreneur and Developer Company Buy Promenade Shops for $103M: Report

June 17, 2024

June 17, 2024

Acquisitions Include 1202, 1222, 1225, 1232, 1339, and 1344 Third Street Promenade Federal Realty Investment Trust has sold eight parcels...