April 1, 2020 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

SMa.r.t. Column: The City’s Hidden Thirst

City Council voted last month to increase water rates throughout the city by about 100% over a period of 5 years. The proposed increase led to disagreement and bitterness among many residents.

Controversies over the rate increases mark the first hints of a hard, unpleasant reality that will soon hit the city and its residents: we may not have enough water to supply the city’s needs in the next decade. The State’s new requirements for 9,000 additional housing units by the end of the decade make the current plans to conserve and re-use water questionable, and possibly obsolete. The city’s current projects, designed before the new requirements were announced, might not be enough to supply demand if the city remains committed to the goal of water self-sufficiency.

Santa Monica gets most of its water from its own wells, and purchases the rest from the Metropolitan Water District. The imported water is vulnerable to the effects of drought. As the water supply from the state diminishes with drought and more users, the cost of that water will rise. To reduce the impact of an unstable state water supply, the City developed a plan to be water self-sufficient by this year (later changed to 2023). The purpose: replace imported water with captured and recycled water, and use it for non-potable needs.

The plan requires large investments in new water-conservation and recycling infrastructure–pipes, tanks, pumps and other equipment, including new wells (hence the water rate increases, among other reasons). Our wells, old and new, will continue to draw from a vulnerable underground supply shared, and desired, by adjacent cities. Wells will be made more efficient and productive, and recycled water will be injected back into the ground for future re-use.

Two years ago, the City updated its Sustainable Water Master Plan (link: https://tinyurl.com/wrnptgm). The Plan’s estimates by expert consultants showed that, with the recommended measures mentioned above (and some luck in avoiding droughts), in 2030 the city’s water supply would probably exceed the amount needed for self-sufficiency by about 1.1 million gallons a day. These calculations did not, however, take into account the state’s new housing requirements, which would add about 20,000 residents to the city and overwhelm any water savings included in the master plan.

More recently, the city’s staff revised those projections and increased the estimates of water thought to be available–equipment would be made more efficient, more water could be pumped out of the ground, and consumers could be induced to use less water (from 110 gallons a day per capita, to 94). When all these estimates are taken together, the City claimed that the newly-revised supply projections may meet, and even exceed, the projected demand.

But what if staff’s latest rosy estimates are wrong? What if the billion gallons of water the city expects to save every year through conservation don’t materialize? What if the 200 million gallons the city plans on recycling add up to less than expected? The city plans to replenish the groundwater supplies with recycled water. But what if one of our neighbors sucks up that water before we do?

The reality: the estimates are based on best-case assumptions about water supply in the region, efficiency of equipment, cooperation by consumers, and accurate population and business demands. Those are a lot of plates to keep spinning without dropping. Any of these, even if accurate one year, could easily be off-base the next. The latest staff report admits that the city plans to extract water from underground sources “within the upper limit of the estimated sustainable yield.” What if the sustainable yield proves to be smaller? The report is quite candid: “further analysis will be required to determine if future demand will exceed what could be sustainably pumped from the basin.”

Will residents and businesses cut their consumption by nearly 20 gallons a day? Will businesses expand their water use along with the growth in population? Will nearby cities–with their own state-mandated population increases–begin to use up the underground water supplies on which Santa Monica depends?

All of this suggests that the staff report’s conclusions, and City Council’s actions, may be skating on the edge of wishful thinking. If any of the assumptions in the latest plan update proves to be off, we will face water shortages in the City. And if (or rather, when) a drought comes, it is possible that all of the assumptions will be proven wrong. Anybody who has lived in a city where water is switched off several hours every day understands the risk.

The measures the city is taking are well considered and carefully planned. But the reality is that a suitable reserve of water capacity–enough to ensure against depletion and crippling shortages–can be provided only by taking measures the City seems reluctant to pursue. To reduce demand, the city could fight the recent heavy state mandates on housing, and limit the number of projects built within city limits. To do so would expose city leaders to accusations that they are against housing. The City can crack down on water-intensive businesses, such as hotels. That would bring opposition from a business sector the city deems essential. The city could require landlords to install water meters in the thousands of apartment buildings lacking them. But this would put a new financial burden on tens of thousands of renters and the landlords that house them, and probably is untenable in this city, politically. The city could build (or participate in) a new desalination plant. This would be a difficult measure in a city that prides itself on respect for the environment.

Residents and businesses depend on a stable water supply. Getting close to the limiting edge of sustainability, and then depending on measures that may work one year and not the next, is a risky venture on which to base a city’s future plans. The city’s obligation is to reduce risk to consumers, not increase it. A day of reckoning is coming, and tough decisions will be needed soon. Will city leaders step up to the challenge?

Daniel Jansenson, Architect, Building and Fire Life-Safety Commission
Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow: Thane Roberts, Architect, Robert H. Taylor AIA, Daniel Jansenson Architect, Building and Fire Life-Safety Commission, Ron Goldman FAIA, Samuel Tolkin Architect, Mario Fonda-Bonardi AIA, Planning Commissioner, Phil Brock, Arts Commissioner

Related Posts

Big Blue Bus Drivers Test Positive for COVID-19

March 31, 2020

March 31, 2020

Over 40 confirmed cases in Santa Monica By Sam Catanzaro Two Big Blue Bus drivers have tested positive for the...

Brock on Your Block: Take a Stroll Through Santa Monica History

March 31, 2020

March 31, 2020

In the latest Brock on Your Block, Phil Brock meets Michael Murphy, Santa Monica historian, at the Santa Monica History Museum,...

Palisades Park Closure Extended

March 30, 2020

March 30, 2020

Los Angeles County COVID-19 cases over 2,000 By Sam Catanzaro The City of Santa Monica has extended the closure of...

Edify TV: Did Santa Monica Stay Home?

March 30, 2020

March 30, 2020

The City of Santa Monica has closed the beach, beach bike path and Palisades Park (just for the weekend) to...

Dr. John McGrail on Psychological and Spiritual Effects of Coronavirus

March 29, 2020

March 29, 2020

Self-Improvement Expert Dr. John McGrail shares tips and techniques to help everyone By Staff Writer Self-Improvement Expert Dr. John McGrail...

Santa Monica Beaches Close

March 27, 2020

March 27, 2020

Beach bike path, Ocean Front Walk close as well By Sam Catanzaro Santa Monica beaches are closing following an LA...

Edify TV: Santa Monica Farmers Market During COVID-19

March 26, 2020

March 26, 2020

Many farmers markets remain open for business during the COVID-19 outbreak, including the Santa Monica Farmers Market. Hear from vendors...

County Tells All Residents to be Prepared for Isolation, Quarantine

March 25, 2020

March 25, 2020

LA County COVID-19 cases over 1,000 By Sam Catanzaro The director of public health for Los Angeles County is advising...

Minor Dies From COVID-19 as Santa Monica Cases Rise

March 24, 2020

March 24, 2020

LA County coronavirus count over 600 By Sam Catanzaro County health officials have announced that a minor has died as...

Santa Monica Announces Fines for Violating Stay at Home Orders

March 24, 2020

March 24, 2020

Updated March 24, 2020 3:45 p.m. Santa Monica Police Department authorized to issue administrative citations By Sam Catanzaro Santa Monica...

Video: Puff Puff, Don’t Pass

March 23, 2020

March 23, 2020

“People are buying [it] like they are buying toilet paper.” While the economy has been hit hard by COVID-19, one...

Santa Monica Closes Beach Parking Lots

March 22, 2020

March 22, 2020

Updated March 24, 2020 3:45 p.m. City advises avoiding beach, Palisades Park, beach bike path By Sam Catanzaro Following a...

Community Heroes: Delivery Workers

March 20, 2020

March 20, 2020

“Everyone is working 12 hours shifts to keep up with demand.” Hear from delivery workers, true community heroes during the...