April 19, 2021 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

California Secretary of State Backs Plaintiffs’ Appeal Against Santa Monica’s Election System

California Secretary of State Alex Padilla, 18 state legislators file amicus curiae briefs

By Sam Catanzaro

The California Secretary of State and 18 state legislators who contributed to the enactment of the California Voting Rights Act have filed letters on behalf of plaintiffs in a lawsuit against the City of Santa Monica that contends the city’s at-large election system violates the CRVA.

The case filed by plaintiffs Pico Neighborhood Association, Maria Loya and Advocates for Malibu Public Schools alleges that Santa Monica’s at-large election system dilutes Latino voting power in violation of the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA) and discriminates against Latino voters in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the California Constitution.

In a ruling released February 15, 2019, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Yvette M. Palazuelos ordered that all future elections for seats on the Santa Monica City Council be based on a seven-district map drawn by an expert for the plaintiffs, including a 30 percent Latino district. The City then appealed this decision.

On July 9, 2020, a three-judge panel from the California 2nd District Court of Appeal ruled in favor of the city saying that Latinos, who account for 14 percent of Santa Monica’s electorate, lack the numbers to win an election in the 30 percent Latino district ordered by Judge Palazuelos.

On August 18, the plaintiffs asked the Supreme Court to review the appellate court’s decision.

California Secretary of State Alex Padilla on Tuesday, September 7 submitted an amicus curiae brief challenging the appellate court’s ruling that Latino voters in Santa Monica are not concentrated enough to constitute a district with a majority needed for Latino candidates to win.

“The Court of Appeal’s opinion, however, threatens to interfere with the ability of aggrieved plaintiffs to obtain relief from voting rights violations the CRVA was specifically intended to remedy,” Padilla wrote. “Contrary to the Court of Appeal’s characterization of evidence – or lack thereof – that an influence district could translate into electoral success, the trial court highlighted such evidence in its Statement of Decision, including reference to a study that found in districts with a minority population of even less than 30% of a district’s electorate, previously unsuccessful candidates in at-large elections, won in district elections.”

“The trial court found that Plaintiff’s expert witness David Ely’s seven-district plan would increase the ability of Latinos to influence the election, or elect their candidate of choice,” Padilla added.

Padilla’s letter comes after an amicus curiae brief was submitted by 18 California legislators, all of whom served in the California Legislature in 2002 and contributed to the enactment of the CVRA. Among these legislators include the principal legislative author and sponsor of the CVRA, retired Senator Richard Polanco, as well as five members of the Elections and Judiciary committees that reviewed and approved the CVRA before it was approved by the full Senate and Assembly.

“The electoral history and political dynamic in Santa Monica perfectly demonstrate why a majority-minority district requirement makes no sense in California. The Superior Court adopted a seven-district map, with a remedial influence district, centered on the Pico Neighborhood, in which Latinos comprise 30% of the eligible voters. Latino candidates, strongly preferred by Latino voters, received the most votes in the Pico Neighborhood District but lost in the at-large elections. The Superior Court considered this election history, as well as the strong political organization of Latinos in the Pico Neighborhood, the extraordinary cost of citywide council campaigns in Santa Monica, the wide disparity in wealth between Latinos and non-Hispanic whites in Santa Monica, and the results of similar influence districts in other cities, concluding that Latinos could elect candidates of their choice in the Pico Neighborhood district, or at least influence the outcome of the elections,” reads the letter. “Yet, the Court of Appeal…ignored all of this, and held that without the potential for a majority-minority district there can be no ‘dilution.'”

In the City’s response to the Plaintiffs’ request for review by the California Supreme Court filed September 4, defense attorneys argued that Latinos are already electing candidates of their choice, bringing up the surnames of candidates.

“In focusing solely on Latino-surnamed candidates, the trial court disregarded the vast majority of candidates in Santa Monica’s elections over the past quarter century—even when those candidates received virtually unanimous support from the City’s Latino voters and won. This artificially narrow focus on candidates with Spanish surnames reflected plaintiffs’ reverse engineered and result-oriented presentation of the data,” the response reads. “These errors, among others, independently required reversal. When the undisputed facts are analyzed under the federal standards for racially polarized voting that the CVRA adopts, they confirm that Latino-preferred candidates usually win in Santa Monica.”

According to the City, in elections analyzed by experts, 73 percent of Latino-preferred candidates won—and of those who lost, only three were “even arguably defeated by white bloc voting,” the City argues.

“The same holds true if the analysis is limited, as plaintiffs argued, to only those eight Council elections in which a Latino-surnamed candidate ran—12 of the 18 Latino-preferred candidates (67%) won, and of the few who lost, only three were even arguably defeated by white bloc voting,” the City said. “Latino voters are already electing candidates of their choice. There is no cause to abandon the City’s well-functioning electoral system in favor of a districting plan that would limit rather than expand Latino voting power.”

Related Posts

Edify TV: $2 Billion Beverly Hills Development Proposed Near Westside

April 16, 2021

April 16, 2021

A developer wants to build a $2 billion condo and retail development flanking the Beverly Hilton hotel. Learn more in...

State Funds Two Additional Sustainable Housing Proposals in Santa Monica

April 16, 2021

April 16, 2021

Proposals are designed to help with affordability and sustainability  By Toi Creel California is paving the way for environmentally-friendly housing...

Santa Monica City Council Rejects Proposed Ban of Certain Items at Protests

April 15, 2021

April 15, 2021

Lawmakers vote down item 4-3 at meeting this week  By Sam Catanzaro  Santa Monica lawmakers rejected a motion this week...

Edify TV: LAFD Announces Likely Cause of Ballona Wetlands Fire

April 15, 2021

April 15, 2021

The LAFD has revealed the cause of a March fire that destroyed five acres of the Ballona Wetlands. Learn more...

Shake Shack Set to Open in Santa Monica

April 15, 2021

April 15, 2021

NYC-based burger chain to open at Wilshire and 5th this weekend By Kerry Slater East Coast burger joint Shake Shack...

Restaurant Spotlight: Piccolo Bringing Fine Italian Dining to Santa Monica and Venice

April 15, 2021

April 15, 2021

Latest restaurant from Chef Antonio Mure with two locations on Westside  By Timothy Michael An esteemed chef with deep ties...

Food Review: Griddle Cake Perfection Arrives in Santa Monica

April 15, 2021

April 15, 2021

Breakfast by Salt’s Cure lands on Montana Avenue in Santa Monica By Kerry Slater A new breakfast spot on Montana...

Edify TV: Venice Handball Courts Encampment Cleared

April 15, 2021

April 15, 2021

Sanitation crews Thursday cleared a homeless encampment at the Venice Beach handball courts. Learn more in this video made possible...

ArcLight Cinema Santa Monica Closing

April 14, 2021

April 14, 2021

Pacific Theatres will not reopen locations across country due to pandemic  By Sam Catanzaro  The 12-screen ArcLight Cinema complex in...

Westside Cafe Helping Save Monarch Butterflies

April 13, 2021

April 13, 2021

This Westside cafe is doing its part to keep its namesake insect, the monarch butterfly, safe. Learn more in this...

Junior Lifeguards Returning This Summer

April 13, 2021

April 13, 2021

County-run program returns to LA County beaches July and August  By Sam Catanzaro A few weeks are left for prospective...

Earth Day Beach Cleanup at Santa Monica Beach

April 13, 2021

April 13, 2021

Santa Monica Travel & Tourism organizing April 22 event  On Earth Day next week join a “micro-cleanup” to help beautify...

Six Vendors Released on Citation for Fight at Santa Monica Pier

April 12, 2021

April 12, 2021

Santa Monica police cite and release six people involved in Sunday incident By Sam Catanzaro Six individuals were released on...