August 5, 2021 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

SMa.r.t. Column: Saving a Failed Marriage – Part 2

Every 8 years, the state requires cities to update their planning code’s “housing element” to reflect the number of dwelling units that SCAG (Southern California Association of Governments) determines each city within their countywide jurisdiction is required to provide under threat of financial penalty.  Without explanation, this number increased from 1,600 units in the current cycle (2014 – 2021) to 8,900 in the next cycle (2022 – 2029), with 6,000 of these units to meet “affordable” standards.

Last week’s Part 1 article focused on what I’m calling a failed marriage between recent city councils and the development community in providing only 6 – 8% of “inclusionary housing” instead of a goal of 30% while managing to increase market rents on the remaining units including workforce housing and contributing to homelessness!

This week’s article focuses on the development communities effort to “upzone” commercial and multi-family residential projects with increased size, height, and density to meet the inflated SCAG numbers, further jeopardizing our city’s DNA.  

And next week’s article refutes the need for upzoning while outlining the ability to meet whatever the number of units that growth can accommodate without exceeding our infrastructure or losing our relaxed beachfront environment.

Santa Monica is a low-rise beachfront community of 94,000 residents.  Its recreation together with the arts gives identity to the city.  But Santa Monica is being asked to expand the population by 20% in the next 8 years.  Is there a city that has grown 20% in 8 years, and if so, what is the quality of life in that city?  Even though Santa Monica is the 2nd densest city on the California coast – there are no other coastal communities that were assigned more than 55% of the housing increase that we were assigned!

Santa Monica’s LUCE, our general plan, estimated growth to be 4,900 units in the 20 year period from 2010 – 2030, not 8,900 units in 8 years!  Although these state mandated numbers are baseless, our prior City Council did not defend itself, or us, in the process!!  Why didn’t our prior City Council join 50 other cities in appealing this mandate??

Every city needs a housing element, but also an overall plan that coordinates its transportation, open space, cultural and institutional sectors, commercial and residential elements in concert with each other.  And it’s critical that these activities and numbers are reasonably correct in order to determine existing and needed infrastructure.  Moreover, how can the city afford $2.9 billion dollars to build 6,000 affordable units?

In an effort to address the housing shortage, with currently 4,000 vacant apartments in Santa Monica, our city government over the past two decades has unintentionally or otherwise made a bargain with the devil as well as with developers to address this shortage.  But our housing crisis is not the amount of housing, but one of affordability, gentrification and increased homelessness.

Why upzone when existing zoning and the market can comfortably provide – if even necessary – the increase being discussed.  Increasing housing supply through deregulation of size, height, and density is nonsense – benefits only developers and land speculators.  Where will the money come from for required infrastructure and how will it affect our quality of life?  And how many affordable units will be demolished to build these 8,900 units?  Reviewing the development envelope that exists along our commercial boulevards and downtown area, it’s quite clear that increasing zoning capacity is categorically unnecessary whether we build 890 units or 8,900 units.

Upzoning has not and will not produce low-cost housing, in fact, it makes the housing crisis even worse.  In an effort to reduce costs, Vancouver upzoned density throughout the city and only exacerbated affordability.  And here in Santa Monica, the NMS sale of buildings will “pull up market values all over the city” quoting a noted commercial real estate firm.  There are no trickle-down economic benefits.  This mandate only further gentrifies our community, driving out current low-income residents.  It does not increase the supply of affordable housing, it only supports real estate speculation!  And current projections suggest both city and state population is static, if not declining.

We’ve done far too much piecemeal planning and development.  Upzoning will quickly lose our sense of community and character.  Our downtown will continue to “canyonize” !  We can’t continue to trash our environment.

And what has caused prior and recently re-elected councilmembers to come into office favoring lower density and height limits, only to later vote with the development community?  Was it the need to cover campaign debts, or future campaigns? Whatever the reason, it has not been beneficial for the community to witness the transformation.

As our country wrestles with internal divisions, so does Santa Monica. The development community, in addition to controlling Santa Monica, has now overtaken Sacramento, with the primary purpose of increasing land value.  With less restriction on land and density on coastal property, prices will escalate even more!  And 8.900 new units brings infrastructure costs and needs front and center.  The housing crisis should not become justification for real estate speculation.

Developers and Sacramento should not take over the city’s planning function.  SCAG numbers could be an ecological disaster as buildings over 3 stories can’t be net zero energy usage with current technology!

Is Santa Monica a mid-rise or a high-rise city?  Prior City Councils have focused on housing and densification, whereas residents are focused on quality of life!  But as previously mentioned, the housing crisis is one of economic inequality, not a housing shortage.  There is absolutely no need to “upzone,” but there are two basic issues to resolve – 1) affordable housing and 2) accommodating growth within density and design guidelines that retain Santa Monica’s DNA!

Ron Goldman FAIA for SMa.r.t.

(Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow)

Thane Roberts, Architect, Robert H. Taylor AIA, Ron Goldman FAIA, Architect, Dan Jansenson, Architect, Building and Fire-Life Safety Commission, Samuel Tolkin Architect, Mario Fonda-Bonardi, AIA, Planning Commissioner, Marc Verville CPA Inactive, Michael Jolly, AIRCRE

For previous articles see www.santamonicaarch.wordpress.com/writing 

Related Posts

New Street Furniture Program Coming to Bus Stops Across Los Angeles

August 4, 2021

August 4, 2021

StreetsLA is debuting a new program adding shade, seating, and other amenities to bus stops across Los Angeles. Brought to...

New Renderings Revealed for Future Multi-Use Building on La Cienega blvd

August 4, 2021

August 4, 2021

The SHop will be a multifamily housing and office space replacing the self-storage facility on the corner of La Cienega...

New West LA High-Rise Apartment Building Reaches its Final Height

August 4, 2021

August 4, 2021

“The Landmark” is the tallest apartment building West of the 405 and the first new high-rise built in the last...

Santa Monica’s UCLA Hospital Ranks No. 1 in State, No. 3 in Nation

August 3, 2021

August 3, 2021

Highest set of rankings ever for UCLA Health  By Sam Catanzaro UCLA Health hospitals have ranked No. 1 in both...

La County Health Lifts Water Advisory For Santa Monica Beaches: Santa Monica Beat – August 2, 2021

August 2, 2021

August 2, 2021

Local news and culture in under 5 minutes. * La County Health Lifts Water Advisory For Santa Monica Beaches *...

Man Killed in Santa Monica Hit and Run

August 2, 2021

August 2, 2021

Fatality occurs early Monday morning on Santa Monica Boulevard By Sam Catanzaro A man was killed in a hit and...

Millions of Gallons of Partially Treated Sewage Continue to be Discharged Into Santa Monica Bay

August 2, 2021

August 2, 2021

Hyperion Water Reclamation Plant still not operating at full efficiency following July spill  By Sam Catanzaro Three weeks after a...

Update on $870M UCLA Student Housing Expansion Project

August 2, 2021

August 2, 2021

UCLA is expanding student housing with 3 buildings currently in development. Video brought to you by Hillside Memorial.

Library Director Patty Wong to Leave Santa Monica

July 30, 2021

July 30, 2021

Santa Monica Public Library (SMPL) Director Patty Wong announced recently that she will leave Santa Monica to take on the...

City Council Prioritizes Housing for Historically Displaced Households

July 28, 2021

July 28, 2021

At its meeting on July 13, Santa Monica City Council made changes to Santa Monica’s Affordable Housing Production Program and...

Homeless Man Charged with Hate Crime in Assault of Korean Woman in Santa Monica

July 27, 2021

July 27, 2021

Melvin Taylor faces charges in connection to July 23 incident By Sam Catanzaro Hate crime charges have been filed against...

Homeless Advocate Arrested Near Shelter on Suspicion of Dealing Drugs, Claims no Wrongdoing

July 27, 2021

July 27, 2021

65-year-old Garry Featherstone accused of selling meth, PCP By Sam Catanzaro A self-described homeless outreach advocate was recently arrested near...

Off Leash Dog Park And Picnic Area Coming To Downtown Santa Monica: Santa Monica Beat – July 27, 2021

July 27, 2021

July 27, 2021

Local news and culture in under 5 minutes. * Off Leash Dog Park And Picnic Area Coming To Downtown Santa...