June 28, 2022 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Opinion: Shore Hotel and Unite Here Local 11

By David G. Brown 

While reading one of the mass text messages recently sent by Unite Here Local 11 in opposition to Shore Hotel’s latest project, my interest was piqued. I’ve often heard the owners of Shore Hotel referred to as “bad actors” who promised low-cost lodging but instead constructed a luxury hotel without building permits. 

As a now-retired project manager who oversaw large developments for decades, I often wondered how it was possible Shore Hotel was built two blocks from City Hall without permits. Nobody noticed buildings being demolished and a big new hotel rising in their place, just steps from our world-famous Santa Monica pier? I smell a rat. 

I followed my curiosities and discovered an epic comedy of errors. Based on local media coverage and the texts I received from Unite Here, I thought the Coastal Commission was unaware of the project until after it was built. That, however, is false. 

The commission approved the project with conditions. After that, nobody knows exactly what transpired or how the Coastal Development Permit lapsed without the hotel owners and, remarkably, their design and construction consultants (the experienced professionals paid big bucks to ensure all permits and legal entitlements are obtained) knowing it, but it is plausible if even the relevant government agencies weren’t sure of the CDP’s status.

What is clear, though, is that the City of Santa Monica issued a building permit and ultimately approved the hotel’s Certificate of Occupancy without verifying a valid CDP was in place – an egregious and likely unprecedented oversight by city staff. 

Apparently even Coastal staff weren’t aware the CDP had expired until a few years later when Shore Hotel returned to the commission to amend it. I was told heads rolled at Coastal over this debacle, but not at City Hall. Accountability isn’t really Santa Monica’s strong suit.

Before the CDP issue was discovered, Shore had already agreed to pay a $1.2 million low-cost lodging mitigation fee the city could use to fund affordable hotel projects. This action freed Shore of the rate restrictions placed on the project by the city and, in my experience, paying that fee locally should have satisfied the Coastal Commission as well. 

The commission, however, didn’t appreciate the egg left on its face by the CDP blunder and strong-armed a historic $15 million fine, another low-cost lodging in-lieu fee of $2.3 million, and mandated that the hotel offer 72 affordable rooms in perpetuity. That’s right, Shore paid more than $3.5 million total in mitigation fees to lift rate restrictions yet is still required to restrict rates. 

I’m not surprised by the steep penalties or that government agencies shirked their share of responsibility for this mess, but what is interesting is that none of the above punitive actions have been enough to warrant forgiveness in the court of public opinion. Shore Hotel can thank Unite Here for that. 

I never paid attention to Unite Here until a few years ago when my neighbor explained City Council passed an ordinance at the union’s behest that ensured a higher minimum wage be paid to hotel workers but exempted hotel’s with union contracts, meaning workers represented by Unite Here do not receive the higher wage! 

They did this to incentivize non-union hotels to unionize, which would provide more members, money, and power to Unite Here – all at the expense of people they are supposed to protect. (Shore, one of the few non-union hotels in Santa Monica, never acquiesced to the union’s pressures.)

My opinion of Unite Here declined further when they supported projects we residents vehemently opposed (Fairmont Miramar expansion and 4th and 5th/Arizona). The union has a louder voice than those of us who actually live in Santa Monica and always seems to get its way. If you’re wondering why, follow the money. 

We know cash is king in our pay-to-play city, and my suspicions were confirmed by searching campaign finance databases. Unite Here has made generous donations to many politicians and their PACs, including some familiar faces: Gleam Davis, Mayor Sue Himmelrich, Ben Allen, Richard Bloom, Ted Lieu, Kevin McKeown, Greg Morena, Terry O’Day, Tony Vazquez, and Ted Winterer, as well as SMRR and Santa Monica Democratic Club – our homegrown PACs whose endorsements often predict election results. 

Knowing this, it will be interesting to see if Councilmember Davis and Mayor Himmelrich’s votes will align with the union’s wishes at Shore Hotel’s upcoming City Council hearing.

I share this information as an example of things that happen in our idyllic beach city when we’re not paying attention. I implore my fellow residents to support and oppose what you wish but take nothing at face value – especially when the primary opponent (or proponent) of a project is a union with an obvious motive, no genuine local ties, and many politicians in its deep pockets. 

David G. Brown is a resident of the North of Montana neighborhood.

in Opinion
Related Posts

SMa.r.t. Column: The Mansionization of Santa Monica

June 17, 2022

June 17, 2022

Editor’s note: This column originally appeared in print in 2016.  In the 1980s, Santa Monica’s single family zoning code was...

OP-Ed Response to DTSM Board Chair Barry Snell and Plea to City Council Regarding Safety Ambassadors and Ambassador Program

June 14, 2022

June 14, 2022

I am responding to the OP-ED (dated June 7, 2022, Santa Monica Mirror) by City-appointed DTSM Board Member and now...

SMa.r.t. Column: Wheeling Electrically

June 9, 2022

June 9, 2022

A recent weekend visit to Dana Point, on the Orange County coastline, revealed a curious scene: dozens, if not hundreds...

Population Loss: New Era or Pandemic Glitch?

June 3, 2022

June 3, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist The numbers suggest a major change is underway in California. It would take a Nostradamus to...

SMa.r.t. Column: The Sound of Silence Is Big & Tall

June 3, 2022

June 3, 2022

All too often these days we find ourselves wondering how we could have been so correct about so many planning...

OP-Ed: DTSM Chair Barry Snell on Safety Ambassadors

June 2, 2022

June 2, 2022

By Barry Snell Chair, Downtown Santa Monica, Inc. Board of Directors  The Downtown Santa Monica, Inc. (DTSM) Board of Directors...

Affordable Spaces for Small Business

May 27, 2022

May 27, 2022

Los Angeles County recently proposed a program providing financial incentives for certain “Legacy” family businesses in their original historical location....

​​Doubt Removed: Oil Refiners Gouging Us

May 23, 2022

May 23, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist There was some room for doubt back in February, when gasoline prices rose precipitously: Until the...

Is the Big Housing Crunch Mostly Fiction?

May 20, 2022

May 20, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist In some parts of California, there is definitely a housing crunch: small supplies of homes for...

Is Gelson’s Our Future? Bigger Is Not Better & Not Necessary! – Part 2

May 20, 2022

May 20, 2022

The dream of our beachfront city is about to become a nightmare! Just imagine a tsunami of these projects washing...

Column From Santa Monica Mayor Himmelrich: We Walk the Talk

May 12, 2022

May 12, 2022

By Sue Himmelrich, Santa Moncia Mayor  I like the SMa.r.t. architects. I often agree with them. But in allowing Mark...

Is Gelson’s Our Future? Bigger Is Not Better!

May 12, 2022

May 12, 2022

It’s appalling to see what’s happening in our city – projects recently built or about to be approved – in...

Renting Your Second Home

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

If you are among the many Americans who own a second home that you occasionally use as a vacation getaway,...

Column: Cities Fight to Maintain Distinctive Characters

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist Anyone who knows California well will realize that Palo Alto does not look much like nearby...

SMa.r.t. Column: Gelson’s, Boxed-In

May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

This week we are re-visiting an article from 2018 regarding the Miramar project, by simply replacing the word “Miramar” with...