November 10, 2024 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Opinion: Response to ‘Santa Monica—Dawn of the Downtown Dead Now Playing in Santa Monica’

By Michelle Gray

In an inaccurate and cruelly reductive piece, “Santa Monica—Dawn of the Downtown Dead Now Playing in Santa Monica”, commercial real estate developer and manager and current Housing Commission applicant Michael Jolly idealizes historic homelessness as more tolerable and unthreatening, warning us that today “dirty man-made monsters and criminals on the loose” (read: unhoused people) mark the “dawn of an apocalypse”.

While Jolly’s appreciation of local housing problems may be recent and uncomplicated, homelessness is an old and long-growing crisis sustained by multiple complex, systemic failures and more than a few bad or indifferent actors. While the number of homeless people has increased in recent years, it is neither new nor unique to Santa Monica. 

It is, however, a monstrous experience.

Homelessness erodes the bodies and spirits of those without homes as well as the communities in which they struggle badly to survive. Jolly and others who malign homeless people speak to housed Santa Monicans’ real and justified fear, anger, and despair about worsening conditions here. But caricaturing homeless people as dirty monsters creates a tidy scapegoat for our complex problems; it does not solve them.

Was Jolly using a weak reference to popular culture as hyperbole to make his point? Yes. Was he throwing homeless people under the bus in the process? Yes.

Every unhoused person in Santa Monica deserves respect, consideration, and help, just as every housed Santa Monican deserves a safe and healthy community. We cannot affect the change we need at the expense of other people.

And objectifying central stakeholders in the complicated effort to alleviate homelessness is unproductive as well as unkind. Crime, safety, sanitation, hygiene, healthcare, and treatment all warrant discussion. But depictions that conflate unhoused people with crime, filth, poor hygiene, addiction, and illness impede all of us by obscuring crucial factors like disability and economic inequality that underlie homelessness.

Jolly’s willingness to dehumanize this entire group of struggling people undermines any authority his practical suggestions may have indicated, because it betrays a poor fundamental grasp of these underlying issues.

And Jolly’s article was dehumanizing. Not just by comparing homeless people to dangerous, unnatural beasts, but by personally taking and using sensitive, compromising photos of unhoused people (with no identification or apparent permission or interview request). Jolly’s photos betray his disconnection from unhoused people, and by using the photos, Jolly reveals his willingness to objectify vulnerable people for his own ends.

Homeless people are not props. Using them as such robs them of their personhood and removes them from the conversation, denying the community vital insight into a complicated problem and reinforcing narratives that perpetuate homelessness. 

I say this as someone who was recently homeless for seven months due to complex, systemic barriers to housing in Santa Monica, including disability and source of income discrimination. I know firsthand that demonizing homeless people silences their diverse and useful voices. It prevents them from contributing valuable information, practical solutions, and more effectively redirected money and resources to the local community, harming everyone in Santa Monica—housed and unhoused.

It’s important to address Jolly’s fantastical and harmful misrepresentation of unhoused people because language and stories both reflect and reinforce our values and biases. Santa Monica deserves thoughtful, unbiased Housing Commissioners who help deepen our understanding of the complex problems we face, and facilitate lasting solutions. Jolly’s sensationalized fear-mongering reinforces our prejudices and distracts us from our goals; he’s not the representation Santa Monica needs.

—Michelle Gray, Santa Monica resident

in Opinion
<>Related Posts

Opinion: Fact Check: Why Vote Yes on Measure QS

November 1, 2024

November 1, 2024

Despite living in a famously progressive region, Santa Monicans are not immune from the same political misinformation and disinformation that...

SM.a.r.t Column: Lack of Oversight and No Accountability

October 31, 2024

October 31, 2024

S.M.a.r.t. periodically invites guest columnists to write opinion articles on topics of particular interests to our readers. Below is an...

SM.a.r.t Column: “Help! I’ve Fallen, and I …!!”, Cries Santa Monica!

October 25, 2024

October 25, 2024

Maybe fallen, but slipping for sure from being a desirable beachfront community that served all equally, the local residents who...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Vote

October 13, 2024

October 13, 2024

In a polarized country or City every vote counts. Regardless of which side of any issue or candidate you support,...

SM.a.r.t Column: Fact-Checking Election-Season Windbaggery

October 6, 2024

October 6, 2024

Claim: The state is requiring Santa Monica to build 9,000 apartments.Answer: Partially true, partially false. Santa Monica has a pretty...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Public Safety and Traffic Enforcement Can Help Save Lives and Revitalize Santa Monica’s Economy

September 29, 2024

September 29, 2024

We wholeheartedly endorse the candidates below for Santa Monica City Council. Their leading campaign platform is for increased safety in...

SM.a.r.t Column: Crime in Santa Monica: A Growing Concern and the Need for Prioritizing Public Safety

September 22, 2024

September 22, 2024

By Michael Jolly Over the past six months, Santa Monica has experienced a concerning rise in crime, sparking heated discussions...

SM.a.r.t Column: Ten New Commandments

September 15, 2024

September 15, 2024

Starting last week,  the elementary school students of Louisiana will all face mandatory postings of the biblical Ten Commandments in...

SM.a.r.t Column: Santa Monica’s Next City Council

September 8, 2024

September 8, 2024

In the next general election, this November 5th, Santa Monica residents will be asked to vote their choices among an...

SM.a.r.t Column: Part II: The Affordability Crisis: Unmasking California’s RHNA Process and Its Role in Gentrification

September 2, 2024

September 2, 2024

Affordability: An Income and Available Asset Gap Issue, Not a Supply Issue (Last week’s article revealed how state mandates became...

SM.a.r.t Column: Part 1: The Affordability Crisis: Unmasking California’s RHNA Process and Its Role in Gentrification

August 26, 2024

August 26, 2024

In the world of economic policy, good intentions often pave the way to unintended consequences. Nowhere is this more evident...

SM.a.r.t Column: They Want to Build a Wall

August 18, 2024

August 18, 2024

Every once in a while, a topic arises that we had previously written about but doesn’t seem to go away....

SM.a.r.t Column: Sharks vs. Batteries – Part 5 of 5

August 11, 2024

August 11, 2024

This is the last SMart article in an expanding  5 part series about our City’s power, water, and food prospects....

SM.a.r.t Column: Your Home’s First Battery Is in Your Car

August 4, 2024

August 4, 2024

This is the fourth in a series of SM.a.r.t articles about food, water, and energy issues in Santa Monica. You...

SM.a.r.t Column: Food Water and Energy Part 3 of 4

July 28, 2024

July 28, 2024

Our previous two S.M.a,r,t, articles talked about the seismic risks to the City from getting its three survival essentials: food,...