July 26, 2024 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

SMa.r.t. Column: Tunneling for Mobility

Editor’s note: this is an April Fools Day column and is intended to be satire. 

Starting this year permits from the Santa Monica Planning Department will require a  new additional fee called “Travel Demand Forecasting Model” This has come not a moment too soon, as the model projects that the neighborhood of Sunset Park will reach complete traffic paralysis by the year 2023 because of the 521 new units at Lincoln and Ocean Park Blvd. At that time, evening traffic, having already gridlocked all the streets, will start to overload all the possible alleys via Waze and that entire quarter of the City will freeze in traffic rigor mortis. This is due to the approximately 2 mile barrier along our southern border formed by the Airport and Penmar Park, so that there are only 3 undersized outlets for southbound traffic: Lincoln Blvd, 23rd Street/Walgrove and Bundy/Centinela. 

Fortunately the traffic wizards of the Mobility Department, tired of being labeled the Tranquility Department because of the 24/7 City wide gridlock,  are implementing a brilliant solution, which is to drill a mile long tunnel under the airport. This tunnel will start at the base of the hill at the intersection of Walgrove and Airport Avenue, and drilling straight north, will daylight  at the east edge of Virginia Park at the intersection of Cloverfield Blvd and Kansas. There will be signals at each end allowing the two reversible lanes to be north bound in the morning and south bound in the evening. 

This added capacity will not only keep traffic out of Sunset Park but also alleviate traffic along 23rd Street, Bundy and Lincoln, all streets now at a virtual functional collapse.  At the north end, tunnel  traffic can feed  Cloverfield, Pico and the 10 Freeway while at the south end it can feed Rose, Beethoven  or Venice Blvd via Walgrove. The City of Los Angeles, having been promised the closure of the airport, has already agreed to optimize Walgrove by removing allowed parking on the east side of Walgrove in the morning (7-9am) and on the west side in the evening (4-7pm). These parking changes will expedite flow and prevent enormous lines at the tunnel exit. 

There will be three ventilation shafts along the one mile tunnel: at the Northwest corner of the runway, and at the eastern “T” legs of the two alleys north of the intersections of Pearl and Cloverfield and north of Ocean Park and Cloverfield. Finally construction  staging will be done at the west end of the runway, now that it is shortened, while the excavation spoils will be used to raise the parking lot north of the Pier (in preparation for the Olympic Volleyball venue in 2028) and to build a curving vehicle ramp west of the Life Guard Station Headquarters to allow emergency vehicles and periodic deliveries to go from Seaside Terrace up to the  vacated pier parking lot (with a traffic light at Ocean Front Walk).  These seaside improvements will defend our greatest tourist asset, the Pier, and our most vulnerable transportation  asset, the Mc Clure tunnel, from inevitable sea level rise and avoid the need for another vehicle bridge at the south edge of the pier when the main existing pier bridge is being remade for pedestrian use only. 

Projected to take 4 years to complete (three and one half  years of community meetings followed by 6 months of EIR bidding and construction): it will cost about $70 million or half the cost of the recent City Hall Annex. While value engineering is still in process, the City may consider making the  tunnel car sized only, with trucks busses etc still using 23rd Street.   The clever City manager, D. Wite, has already persuaded Elon Tusk to loan the City his boring equipment used for his experimental tunnel in Hawthorne.  In that case we will have two smaller tunnels instead of one larger tunnel. Finally to reduce operating costs, the tunnel(s) will have continuously projected advertisements on the interior side of the tunnel(s) that are synchronized to the speed of individual cars like they have in the Shanghai subways.  

This being Santa Monica, everybody has an opinion. Well known community activists have already weighed in. Z. Josephson says “I can’t believe it took the City this long to figure this out”,  while J. Roobin says he “Loves it: and now with this beautiful tunnel, Santa Monica will finally have a world class airport like Van Nuys  not to mention LAX who all have cool tunnels”. And of course organizations have also been throwing up red flags. The ecologists want to make sure the water that the drilling may tap into, will be available for the landscape of the public park projected after the airport’s vacancy. The bicycle lobby wants the ventilation fans only on  the east side of the tunnel to suck the riders uphill but not impede their down hill speed. The Santa Monica Conservancy has objected because the tunnel would disturb the natural setting of the Omni Directional Antenna (ODA), that round navigation aid at the southwest end of the runway. The Conservancy wanted this ODA to be their next Landmark that would be the bookend to their already Landmarked beacon at the other end of the runway. Then the Sierra Club has indicated concern  because the tunnel will disturb the coyotes that live at the end of the runway and are the only natural way to control the rampant raccoons, that with their prehensile hands, are responsible for Santa Monica’s crime increase. Finally the City Council is debating if Sunset Park gets this benefit, what will the other districts want? 

Sometimes the solution to the most complicated problems are right below our feet. Happy April Fools Day.

An earlier version of this  article appeared in April 1, 2019

By Mario Fonda-Bonardi AIA

S.M.a.r.t Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow

Thane Roberts, Architect, Robert H. Taylor AIA, Ron Goldman FAIA, Architect, Dan Jansenson, Architect, Building and Fire-Life Safety Commission, Samuel Tolkin Architect, Planning Commissioner,
Marc Verville M.B.A, CPA (Inactive), Michael Jolly, AIR-CRE.
For previous articles see www.santamonicaarch.wordpress.com/writing

in Opinion
Related Posts

Food, Water, and Energy Part 2 of 4

July 21, 2024

July 21, 2024

Last week’s S.M.a,r,t, article (https://smmirror.com/2024/07/sm-a-r-t-column-food-water-and-energy-part-1-of-3/) talked about the seismic risks to the City from getting its three survival essentials, food,...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Food Water and Energy Part 1 of 3

July 14, 2024

July 14, 2024

Civilization, as we know it, requires many things, but the most critical and fundamental is an uninterrupted supply of three...

Letter to the Editor: Criticizing Israeli Policy Is Not Antisemitic

July 10, 2024

July 10, 2024

In the past several months, we’ve seen increasing protests against Israel’s actions in Gaza. We have also seen these protests...

SMA.R.T. WISHES ALL A VERY HAPPY 4TH OF JULY WEEK

July 7, 2024

July 7, 2024

We trust you are enjoying this holiday in celebration of Independence. Independence to be embraced, personally and civically, thru active...

SM.a.r.t Column: Santa Monica Under SCAG’s Boot

June 30, 2024

June 30, 2024

Four years ago, our esteemed colleague Mario Fonda-Bonardi wrote the prescient essay below when much of the legislative development juggernaut...

SM.a.r.t Column: The Up Zoning Scam (Part 2)

June 23, 2024

June 23, 2024

Last week’s SMart article  (https://smmirror.com/2024/06/sm-a-r-t-column-the-up-zoning-scam-part-1/)  discussed the ambitious 8895 units (including 6168 affordable units) that Santa Monica is required to...

SM.a.r.t Column: The Up Zoning Scam (Part 1)

June 16, 2024

June 16, 2024

Over the last few years, the State of California has mandated a massive upzoning of cities to create capacity for...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Shape Up – On Steroids

June 9, 2024

June 9, 2024

Nine years ago, SMa.r.t wrote a series of articles addressing the adaptive re-use of existing structures. We titled one “Shape...

SM.a.r.t Column: The Challenge of Running a City When City Staff Have Different Priorities

June 2, 2024

June 2, 2024

Living in a city has its perks, but it can be a real headache when the folks running the show...

SM.a.r.t. Column: A Path to Affordable Ownership in Santa Monica

May 27, 2024

May 27, 2024

[Note: our guest author today is Andres Drobny, a former Professor of Economics at the University of London, the former...

SM.a.r.t. Column: A Path Forward for Santa Monica: Part II

May 19, 2024

May 19, 2024

As referenced in Part I of this article, the state’s use of faulty statistics and forceful legislation has left a...

SM.a.r.t. Column: A Path Forward for Santa Monica: Part I

May 12, 2024

May 12, 2024

To quickly summarize, California grapples with an ongoing housing crisis spurred by state implementation of over 100 policies and mandates...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Where Will Our Huddled Masses Sleep? Navigating California’s Affordable Housing Mandates

May 5, 2024

May 5, 2024

Just as Lady Liberty beckons the “huddled masses” of immigrants to America, cities like Santa Monica have an ethical obligation...

SM.a.r.t Column: SMCLC SPEAKS

April 28, 2024

April 28, 2024

SMart (Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow) periodically invites guest columnists who have made a significant contribution to the...

SM.a.r.t Column: Building Modern Boxes Lacks Identity

April 21, 2024

April 21, 2024

In the relentless pursuit of modernity, cities worldwide have witnessed the rise of so-called architectural marvels in the form of...